A group of residents opposed to Toronto’s dedicated cycling infrastructure, which they believe endangers pedestrians and cyclists as well as increasing congestion, have come up with a new way of voicing their displeasure: by blocking one of the Canadian city’s protected bike lane and forcing cyclists out into traffic.
This clip, filmed on Yonge Street – the site of a controversial protected cycle lane – shows protesters standing on the entrance to the segregated portion of the lane, while others hold up signs saying ‘Move the bike lanes’ and ‘Yonge 4 All should include us too’, a reference to a residents’ group which aims to make the street “welcoming, safe, and accessible for people of all ages and abilities” by encouraging more locals to walk, cycle, and visit the area.
The protest, unsurprisingly, was heavily criticised on Twitter, with a number of cyclists noting the “entitlement” of those blocking the cycle lane, while another wrote: “Of all the things to protest… bike lanes?”
> “People are getting killed on the street next to the park. It does not make a lick of sense”: Lawyer blasts “targeted campaign” against speeding cyclists in Toronto parks
Nevertheless, the Yonge Street bike lane has become a focal point for protesters, especially in the lead up to this month’s Toronto mayoral by-election, sparked by the resignation of John Tory, who prioritised adding 100km of bike lanes in and around the city by the end of 2024.
A group called Keep Toronto Moving claims that “a significant proportion of Toronto residents report being negatively affected by the increase in dedicated bike lanes”, a claim debunked by data released by the city which shows that bike lane usage has increased dramatically, with little effect on congestion in the city.
Another similar group, the snappily titled BeRationalTO, opposed the city’s decision to make the Yonge Street bike lane permanent, and claimed that it was hindering emergency services.
“Ill-conceived bike lanes endanger cyclists and pedestrians. They hurt retailers and restaurants. They transform once-quiet residential streets into congested feeder routes between major thoroughfares, which themselves become gridlocked no-go zones,” the group says on its website.
However, Toronto-based cycling advocate Robin Richardson reckons the furious opposition to the city’s bike lanes is merely a symbol for some locals who are “uncomfortable with change”.
“Toronto has spent decades prioritizing motor vehicle travel, and as a result most people think of driving as the default and believe ‘roads should be for cars.’ But as the city grows, with more people living close to downtown, many residents do not own cars,” he told the Canadian Cycling Magazine.
“That means choosing instead to walk, cycle, or take transit to get where they need to go. Everyone should be proud of the progress Toronto has made in its bike lane expansion initiatives.”
> Police officer dishes out fines to cyclists – then crashes his SUV into one in a cycle lane
Despite Richardson’s argument that everyone should be proud of the city’s new infrastructure, one mayoral candidate, Anthony Furey, has even made removing all bike lanes on Toronto’s major roads a key part of his campaign.
Furey’s claims about blocking access to hospitals were again criticised by local cyclists, with one writing: “With hundreds of health care workers (from nurses to technicians to doctors to medical students plus patients) utilizing the protected cycling infrastructure… this is why, on top a number of other reasons, that you will not be elected the Mayor of Toronto.”
Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, our very own CyclingMikey was on hand with an altogether more succinct summary of the prospective mayor’s approach to bike lanes: ““I’m from the Netherlands and you’re as dumb as a rock.”
Well, it wouldn’t be a live blog post without mentioning Mikey, would it?
Add new comment
24 comments
Get out the cycle lane !
https://twitter.com/CyclingLawLDN/status/1664727404844122114
Tactical mistake by the Daleks there. Being restricted to the cycle lanes they found they couldn't conquer a single street, never mind the world.
Presumably the plunger allows them to cope with the pedestrian crossing buttons?
Nice to see the world is in safe hands with Antonio Guterres and his cronies leading by example.
Like all the political classes they talk a good game but fail to deliver at every opportunity.
What a COP out!
The Jimmy Mulvile video is up on Mikey's YouTube channel.
My thoughts are with Bernie's family, friends and colleagues.
I love my Rohloff. I may never truly understand how it works, apart from the term "planetary gears" but work it does.
I love a good internal gear hub. Grokking them? Me neither; I lost it before the Nexus / Alfine. However there are some folks doing their best to explain:
How to put the Rohloff together (in German, of course)
"Gearhubs explored and explained" (I like this chap's delivery as much as the explanations).
Those were a bit weaselly words though given that the Sturmey Archer hub had been around for yonks using the same principles, and though Raleigh's engineering left a lot to be desired in its later years, the original was perfectly well respected and about the only gearing system to be found on utility bikes in the UK for decades.
But Rohloffs were spoken off with tones of reverence in the touring world. Never heard of any complaints about reliability, just enthusiasm for reaching the next oil change.
Don't worry Ryan, I agree about Mads' new Trek kit design and some of the horrors that were 90s kit.
I still want to bleach my eyes every time a classic highlights reel pops up on my YouTube feed.
They ought to have them ride around the RB Kensington & Chelsea. I bet suddenly money would be found for all sorts of cycle-related stuff...
Maybe go through the Royal Parks too...
Presumably then with Furey's logic its impossible for ambulances in Amsterdam to get to hospital with all the bikes obstructing them in traffic ...
Simple! Oh wait, that's India.
It looks like they're only trying to block the entrance, and doing a poor job of it too, so I'd be inclined to slow down or if need be stop and then get on the lane anyway.
It's easy to block motor traffic as it's so space inefficient, but trying to block a cycle lane with 10 people is like trying to block a colander with ten pinky fingers.
The spaces between the bollards are a bit tight at tarmac level, it would be a difficult manouvre on anything with a longer wheelbase. Also what's to say you don't have more protesters lining the kerb waiting to push someone off their bike?
I know it's unlikely but that's not a guarantee.
I would hope that that they're not so crazy as to physically assault someone that ignores them. That said, if one of them was, there'd be a slight temptation to risk it just to make their dumb cause look even more assinine when it blows up in the media.
Taking back bike lanes is the least he could do. But will the new mayor of Toronto commit to smoking crack?
So: protesters who believe that bike lanes are causing congestion protest against the bike lanes by forcing cyclists out into the main traffic lane, which is more likely to cause conflict and congestion and which means that a section of the roadway (the cycle lane) cannot be used by anyone. Alrighty then...
'murica. nuff said.
Perfect example of how to p!$$ off Canadians, eh?
Well, what do they expect if they live in North America. It surprises me that there's not more push-back against the U.S. appropriating the word "american" to mean residents of the U.S.
Must admit - I was a little surprised that it was in Canada. I expected better from them.
Very polite protesting, for a start.
One would hope it not necessary, but if anyone was injured cycling on that stretch of road could they sue the protesters for endangerment?