Oh no, here we go again. "Washed", "delusional", or "coping mechanism"?
Before you come raging at your poor live blog host, that's not me, just people on the internet using those words for the four-time Tour de France winner.
But as I said earlier in the day, eras do come to an end, and maybe this is it for the legendary rider?
It was all going well until Froome gave an interview to GCN, where he might have let his hubris get the better of him for a split second, and that's given all the ammunition to fans to have cheeky digs at him.
The Israel-Premier Tech rider said: "Physically I was ready, but unfortunately I was unable to show my full ability at the races assigned to me due to equipment issues."
And as soon as these words were uttered into the ether, the age-old can of disc brakes was opened, and out crawled all the memories of several instances of Froome blaming his disc brakes for his not-so-great performances.
It's not like the 38-year-old hasn't been mired with "equipment" controversy before. He has swayed from hating disc brakes, to being all aboard the hype train, and then went back to detesting them, even publicly posting a video of a slow wheel change on Instagram for which he got a lot of flak.
> Fed up Froome denounces disc brake wheels on Instagram Reel
Our mysterious forum contributor, Secret_squirrel true to their name, were the first to move with lightning-fast reflexes: "Oh me first me first!
"Equipment issues".... it was those pesky disc brakes wasnt it Chris?"
squired also didn't pass on the free hit, going so far as to pull a reference from the depths of WWE (or WWF depending on how old you are): "Chris Froome is fast becoming the Ric Flair of cycling - "I've got one more in me"."
SimoninSpalding, who reportedly can't be bothered about LTNs and taxis today, had time for Froome's comments: "I have long been a fan of Chris Froome, but this is getting ridiculous.
"IF the equipment he is being given is genuinely $h!t, but he is the best ride on the squad, then his results would still be better than his teammates and he would be picked. UNLESS he is suggesting he is given inferior equipment to that of his teammates which would be a strange decision in light of his purported salary.
"I am afraid he should have accepted his best days were over the first season back post his crash and retired with some dignity."
> What’s wrong with Chris Froome’s disc brakes?
Sean Dowden wrote on Facebook: "Circling the drain. Blaming equipment on his lack of results. Just retire.", while Richard Docherty was more pitiful: "Sadly a decision out of his hands. Maybe time to bow out and move into coaching and/or team management."
To Froome's misery (chap's got enough already), Twitteratti weren't so kind, going straight for the jugular.
Me? I don't really have much of an opinion about the guy, so I can just sit back and watch people being petty.
Add new comment
69 comments
Taxi drivers are some of the worst offenders for close passing and other bad driving.
They are experts at using their vehicles to create 'facts on the ground' to gain priority where they do not legally have it.
If taxis must be allowed, then in-cab cctv, dashcams front rear and side and a black box or geographical speed limiter to keep them to 20mph in the LTNs should be a condition of licensing. Still not convinced that that 'must' is really a 'must' though. As for Royal Mail...bloody nutters in my experience.
And so an LTN becomes a fast track network for private enterprise.
I expect the 'professional drivers' will drive even more anti-socially now that they 'don't have to share the road with anyone else.'
Recently saw a taxi driver honk at pedestrians on the pavement so that they could park were they standing.
Black cabs are, per mile travelled, the second largest cause of KSAs for cyclists and pedestrians, after tipper trucks. Admittedly, they are disproportionately likely to be on busy, city centre roads, so it isn't an exactly fair comparison with most cars. But they are dangerous for two additional reasons:
-they often pull dodgy moves like U-turns to pick up passengers on the opposite side of the road
-the taxi trade are very strongly opposed to basic safety measures that apply to other 'professional' drivers such as HGV drivers, such as maximum working hours, tachometers, etc. So there are lots of tired, dangerous cabbies out there.
Big claims require big evidence.
Indeed! It's from a few years back and only shows the K of KSI (presumably what was meant) but if they don't have their own figures they might want to check the PACTS report, page 13, figure 3 - total deaths involved in each mode of transport by distance travelled.
I note the little onion does mention the importance of where the vehicle is operating. This comes up in the PACTS report also - the "per distance travelled" rate makes cyclists almost as dangerous as cars! Worth looking at their analysis at the end too (essentially - not comparing apples with apples here).
Have a play with these stats - taxis account for between 1.7 and 3% of KSAs by cars (i.e. bigger than motorbike, smaller than van) per year.
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/reported-road-accide...
Yes if where's wally was hailing a cab, every taxi driver would spot him in 0.2s. meanwhile the cyclist they cut up, almost invisible.
I've certainly seen a fair few taxi drivers flouting the rules, and I would say on average they tend to worse than other drivers, although of course not all taxi drivers are terrible and not all other drivers are great. I do think driving standards do tend to fall when there is a financial benefit from doing so, as is seen with delivery drivers (and indeed Deliveroo etc. riders) too.
I also think it's missing the point slightly - the role (or otherwise) of taxis as "public transport" ought to be separated from how individual drivers actually behave.
I do think taxis have a role to play. Using taxis means less parking is needed, especially in busy central locations. Taxis can be essential to disabled people (although there are plenty of stories of taxis refusing to accept or offering a very poor service to disabled people too). Taxis can make it easier or more convenient to not own a car or not use a car for certain journeys.
However, none of that is predicated on taxis being able to pass through the LTN restrictions. LTNs are designed so that everywhere is still accessible by vehicle, but rat running is not possible. Therefore, any journey is still possible with a taxi.
Pages