Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Stedman sets British Everesting record; Do you prep your bike for autumn?; Council installed "dangerous" barriers on cycle route due to Strava KoM; Quintana denies doping; Chris Hoy in cake form; 'Shimeng' cassette + more on the live blog

Wednesday's live blog is served to you by Jack Sexty this morning and through the afternoon, with Simon MacMichael rustling up your evening course later on...

SUMMARY

No Live Blog item found.

23 September 2020, 14:08
Stedman fails in Everesting world record attempt, but lowers British record

We've all been there, you're casually dropping the watts then bam, your legs say "no more." Well, maybe not at the speed that the Canyon dhb's Max Stedman climbs at, but we can all relate.

Max Stedman's effort yesterday fell short of the Everesting world record, though his provisional time of 7hrs 32mins netted him the British record. 

Stedman found his 36x32 lowest gear too heavy in the latter stages of his ride, but was helped out by Swift Pro Carbon's Tristan Robbins who provided a much-needed 34T chainring.

23 September 2020, 14:05
Shots fired

Poor old Ilnur Zakarin has missed out on selection for the Russian World Championships squad for this week's race.

He was last seen getting dropped on the descent of the Peyresourde so who knows, he could still be there... 

23 September 2020, 13:54
Yay, autumn...
Lapierre in the leaves

Liam here, just jumping onto the blog while Jack is away for a moment or two. 

It seems like autumn decided to happen overnight. There are leaves on the roads and we've entered that steady state of rain. I've looked at my mudguards a couple of times this morning. They need fitting but I want to know what you're doing to prep your bike for autumn. 

Do you go down my route of getting the winter bike out now? Do you cling onto the summer bike until the roads get icy? Or do you just ride one bike all year round?

Let us know in the comments below.

23 September 2020, 13:10
Strava segment used as reason to install "dangerous" barriers on cycleway: your thoughts on social media
barrier comments.PNG

While some have said that it could be seen as irresponsible to have a Strava segment on a shared cycling and walking route, others say that installing barriers that could cause harm are not the answer. Mark Johnson added: "The route is not dangerous, the barriers certainly are. Imagine coming across these horrors in the dark for the first time." 

What do you think? 

23 September 2020, 13:19
Somerset police sergeant to visit homes of youths accused of anti-social cycling
Wheelie (licensed on Flickr under CC BY 2.0 by Carlos Felipe Pardo).JPG

In his statement shared by PCSO Steve Hill on Facebook, Sergeant Dan Bishop says there has been "an increase in reports of youths on pedal cycles pulling wheelies through Wellington town centre", and the same youth were reported for not stopping at traffic lights and "narrowly missing" pedestrians on pavements. 

He added: "Anti-social cycling is not acceptable and will not be tolerated. The team are currently reviewing photographs of some of the youths involved. We will be visiting identified individuals at home and speaking to them with their parents present. There is both road traffic and ASB legislation that can and will be used to tackle this problem if it continues.

"I would encourage anyone who witnesses youths behaving in this way and putting themselves and others at risk of harm to bring it to the attention of the Wellington Police Team. This can be done by calling 101 or reported on line via the force website."

23 September 2020, 12:41
Why don't cyclists use the cycle lane? Or the bit just outside of the cycle lane?

Wandsworth has had a few stinkers as of late, with their council accused of causing mass panic by encouraging people to prepare 'emergency grab-and-go' bags, and being the centre of aggressive resistance to LTNs from drivers

This cycle lane appears to be the latest mishap in the London borough, with the bike symbols appearing on the outside of a strip of white paint that marks out the lane.  

23 September 2020, 12:31
Shimano? Shimeng.

If you're not familiar, the 'crappyoffbrands' Reddit thread is a mystical treasure trove of copyright violations... including this' Shimeng' 6-speed cassette with a photo of what looks like a genuine Shimano product on the box. 

23 September 2020, 10:37
Cycling up 162% during UK lockdown, reports Strava
London cyclists at traffic lights (copyright Britishcycling.org_.uk).jpg

It appears cyclists - or at least the ones who use Strava - cycled a lot more during the bleaker months of lockdown in the UK, with the social fitness giants reporting a 162% rise in two-wheeled activity in May 2020 compared to the same month in 2019.

In an analysis of Strava Metro data from ten major UK cities, Liverpool topped the list with a whopping 220% rise in the number of individuals cycling. Manchester was second (169%), followed by Glasgow in third (146%). London (119%) cam in fifth, just below Birmingham in fourth (139%). 

Chris Boardman commented: “During lockdown, roads were quieter and people felt safer so we saw a real surge in the number of people cycling and walking their journeys. Now we need to enable them to continue to travel on foot and by bike, making it part of their everyday routine.

“The data we receive from Strava Metro is helping us to get a greater insight into where, when and why people are cycling and walking. This sort of data is invaluable when making decisions about developing future infrastructure."

Unfortunately Strava data also appeared to be invaluable to Stockport Council when making the decision to install dodgy barriers on a popular cycle route, but that's another story...

23 September 2020, 09:17
Stockport Council installed "positively dangerous" barriers on popular cycle route after becoming aware of Strava segment and receiving two complaints

Back in July, Tom Timothy took to Twitter to complain about barriers installed on a segregated cycleway next to the A555 extension in Greater Manchester - and now James G has shared an FOI request from Stockport Council outlining their reasons for installing the chicanes. 

The council say that there were "safety concerns raised by pedestrians directly related to cyclists travelling at speed along this section", particularly where the footway and cycleway link near a local primary school... and it turns out there were three complaints in total throughout the whole of 2019. Two were from the same individual, and one was a letter sent to a local MP. 

When asked what they had done to research the supposed issue of speeding cyclists, the council say they were made aware of a Strava segment "with a leaderboard for the fastest times using the route"; while this does exist, it appears they fell short of investigating the matter aside from recognising that there is in fact a Strava segment on the route for justifying the installation of the chicanes. 

The council say they didn't consult with local cycling and walking groups, and link to an Equality Impact Assessment from 2013 to suggest that the barriers can be navigated by disabled path users and handcyclists. Addressing possible safety concerns, they say: "chicanes of a similar arrangement are in place as safety measures elsewhere on the A555 footway/cycleway and we are not aware of any concerns being raised previously regarding these chicanes."

Mr Timothy added: They [the barriers] are positively dangerous how they are positioned so colour blends into background with no warning, and on a straight bit so possible to approach at speed."

23 September 2020, 09:01
Roglic, Kuss and Dumoulin to ride the Vuelta?

Spanish media are reporting that Jumbo-Visma will be sending their big guns to the Vuelta after failing to secure yellow at the Tour de France - which could be bad news for Chris Froome and other red jersey hopefuls, unless someone young and plucky comes along and beats the lot of them again. 

23 September 2020, 08:25
"I have, and have never had anything to hide": Nairo Quintana strongly denies doping in press release shared on social media

The Colombian has made an official announcement to defend himself amid a doping probe into his team Arkea-Samsic, and had this to say:

I want to clarify the following: The French gendarmerie carried out an operation in the hotel where my team was staying on Wednesday, September 16 in Meribel, after the end of the Tour de France stage.

For the avoidance of doubt, I want to confirm that doping substances were never found. I also want to clear up a misunderstanding: during the recent Tour or during any previous race, I have never had any assistants or personnel from outside the team.

I, Nairo Quintana, have been a clean cyclist throughout my sporting life, and have an impeccable biological passport. I want to clarify for public opinion, to my fans and cycling followers that in my entire career - junior, under-23 and professional - I have never used doping substances, and no illegal substance was found in the police investigation. I, without fear, will continue to be strong, defend the truth and follow my path, no matter how much the crowd, at times, takes another course.

In this sense, it is necessary to emphasise that I have not been accused of anything by the authorities. For my part, I am and will be ready to clarify any doubts from the prosecution, as I already did on Monday and today.

For now, a preliminary investigation is being carried out and I have answered all the questions and doubts. I am willing to continue doing so on a voluntary basis until the whole situation is clarified on the basis indicated: have I used illegal substances that improve my sports performance and that betray the principles of the sport.

I have, and have never had anything to hide. Yesterday, at the summons of the French authorities, I voluntarily appeared before the prosecution and answered each and every one of their questions clearly and with a clear conscience.

Yesterday, we reported that French prosecutors had taken two people into custody as part of their investigation into suspected doping in the Arkea-Samsic team following a raid of the team's hotel after stage 17 of the Tour de France. Their manager Emmanuel Hubert insisted the investigation is not targeted directly at the team, and that it would“immediately dissociate itself” from any evidence that doping had taken place; although his claim that the entourage members taken into custody were not employed by Arkea-Samsic appears to contradict Quintana's claim that he "never consulted "any assistants or personnel from outside the team".

23 September 2020, 08:53
Bloody cyclists again

No respect for the rules of the road...

23 September 2020, 08:08
The winning bake from week one of this year's Great British Bake Off was an edible bust of Chris Hoy

The somewhat disturbing task saw the latest line-up of bakers in the famous tent ordered to make a famous person's head out of cake for the 'showstopper' round... and the star baker emerged as young Peter from Edinburgh, who rustled up a Chris Hoy to beat other notable heads such as Louis Theroux, David Attenborough and Freddie Mercury. Unfortunately for Peter, some viewers thought Chris Hoy in cake reminded them of something else entirely...

Also, surely a Victoria Pendleton sponge would have been more appropriate? (dad joke courtesy of Jo Burt). 

Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story). 

Add new comment

49 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 4 years ago
0 likes

That's why, 1-2-1 Kev. That's why.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
1 like

God on a Quad....
 

Avatar
PeterCee | 4 years ago
5 likes

As a cyclist who has with experience of  the shared used paths in question, I do agree with the viewpoint that these paths are an acident waiting to happen.

Near the junction with the A5102 in Bramhall there is a very narrow tight  90 degree bend with zero visibility of who is coming the other way - whoever designed this corner never considered the safety implications.

The spot where the two barriers shown in the photo are looks quite flat but there are some pretty dangerous downhill sections where freewheeling cyclists will inevitably pick up speed. Couple this with joggers with headphones in , walkers, and people with small children and high levels of background noise from speeding cars - it's a recipe for disaster.

I now avoid the A555 path if at all possible  for this reason.

Shared use paths are great in theory but given the usual mix of unpredictable human behavior in my opinion they are unsafe.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to PeterCee | 4 years ago
9 likes

PeterCee wrote:

Shared use paths are great in theory

I'm not sure there is much theory to them beyond "dump everyone who's not in a car somewhere else out of the way".

Avatar
Capt Sisko | 4 years ago
4 likes

I'm in agreement with the council on this one. The argument is nothing to do with how many people or the number of times they complained, but that the council have been made aware that some people are competing in a speed related activity in a facility provided by them as part of their local infrastructure system, and the said speed related activity (in this case cyclists trying to post the fastest time on Strava) has the potential to cause conflict  with slower users. I agree the barriers are a bad design and they really need some form of reflective signage to make them stand out in the dark, but all the council are doing is their bit to protect vulnerable users.

Don’t blame the council for protecting the said vulnerable users, blame the cyclists who think it’s a good idea to race on a shared path AND then publish their record attempt on a freely availably platform.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to Capt Sisko | 4 years ago
4 likes

Thats a pretty daft statement given the ubiquity of Strava, pretty much every piece of cycle infrastructure has a segment - should we put blockages on them all?

Should all cyclists be inconvienienced for the sake of a few idiots? Put up a warning sign or 2 first. 

If we use the roads as an example "traffic calming" or warnings are not put in place until there is an actual incident.

Avatar
qwerty360 replied to Capt Sisko | 4 years ago
10 likes

Then they should also be required to install chicanes on any road where more than 2 convictions for speeding occur within a year (A far tougher standard than 2 complaints about speed with no other evidence...)

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to qwerty360 | 4 years ago
5 likes

The kind of chicanes that oblige the driver to get out to reposition the car by picking it up to get through....yes

Avatar
Miller replied to Capt Sisko | 4 years ago
11 likes

Christ, what a load of ill-informed nonsense. There's a hardly a stretch of tarmac anywhere that ISN'T a Strava segment. 

What is it about cycling that makes people who don't do it and know F-all about it feel able to pronounce their dumbass views on it. It's maddening.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to Miller | 4 years ago
4 likes

It is true that Strava segments are everywhere but should they be?

I think Strava has some responsibility to police it, banning segments from shared use paths and pedestrianised areas would be a good start.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Rich_cb | 4 years ago
0 likes
Rich_cb wrote:

It is true that Strava segments are everywhere but should they be?

I think Strava has some responsibility to police it, banning segments from shared use paths and pedestrianised areas would be a good start.

I was under the impression that they do ban a load of shared use path segments, but people just keep re-creating them.

Though Strava may get some of the blame for this, we should step back and deal with the actual problem of collisions on the paths. If they are a real problem, then I would consider that to be a police issue rather than randomly putting obstacles on the paths. Random obstacles affect everyone on the path though it's only going to be one or two people being reckless on it.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
3 likes

It can also cause more conflict issues as now everyone on the path has a part where they all have to be to continue in both directions rather then pass each other on either side. 

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
3 likes

Surely it's not beyond the capabilities of Strava's coders to blacklist pedestrianised areas and shared paths so new segments can't be created?

I suppose the difficulty the council have is that they've received a report of dangerous cycling and there is objective evidence to back up the report.

They are probably concerned about liability if they don't respond.

Obviously would be nice if they were so proactive about dangerous roads.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Rich_cb | 4 years ago
2 likes

Rich_cb wrote:

Surely it's not beyond the capabilities of Strava's coders to blacklist pedestrianised areas and shared paths so new segments can't be created?

I suspect they could and also would if they had enough pressure and bad coverage (look at the Army base fiascos), however as strava just records runs and biking on routes made by its members in the whole world, I'm not sure they would have the manpower to bring it in properly, espcially as GPS is not exactly accurate. 

And tbh, people would be speeding their bikes down there whether strava was there or not. I like to think that the majority do it when blatantly empty but some won't.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Capt Sisko | 4 years ago
1 like

Your first paragraph has some merit. However, the council may well have leapt from "someone's complained"  through "something must be done" and landed at squarely at "this is something, we must do it". I'd be interested to know whether they made any type of investigation before opening the public wallet, or for that matter whether they did an accessibility assessment.

They've also managed to bar use of this facility to disabled users, those with non-standard bikes, or those towing trailers. I suppose it could be said that they have protected at least this group of vulnerable road users by preventing their use of the track.....

Avatar
CygnusX1 replied to Captain Badger | 4 years ago
1 like

Captain Badger wrote:

 I'd be interested to know whether they made any type of investigation before opening the public wallet, or for that matter whether they did an accessibility assessment.

They've also managed to bar use of this facility to disabled users, those with non-standard bikes, or those towing trailers. I suppose it could be said that they have protected at least this group of vulnerable road users by preventing their use of the track.....

I specifically asked if they had made any effort to independently assess the risk rather than just going off the complaint:  

  3. Was any effort taken by the council to independently assess the risks resulting from the issue(s)? If so, what method was used to investigate this? Were observers sent to the location, if so on what dates and for how long? Was data from third party sites (e.g. Strava) used? What were the findings of any such investigation

The project team are aware that the link of footway/ cycleway is on strava with a leaderboard for the fastest times using the route https://www.strava.com/segments/18340121.

I also asked if they had performed an EIA on the barriers, but all they could provide was a link to the EIA for the original A555 scheme, not these new additions: 

  6. Was an assessment of the new barriers carried out to ensure that disabled users in wheelchairs, hand cycles etc could do so under your obligations of the Equality Act 2010? Please share the results of such an assessment if it exists.

The Equality Impact Assessment for the A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road was produced October 2013 and can be found at http://a6marr.stockport.gov.uk/746597/760095/762707  

Avatar
Kapelmuur | 4 years ago
5 likes

Which segment are those batters on?   I rode the length of the A555 recently and don't remember seeing them.   

I don't think that the path is appropriate for Strava segments as it's well used by pedestrians and people cycling with young children.   There are many examples of inappropriate segments near where I live including one through a park which passes an under 5s playground and is 50% on a path barely wide enough for 2 people to walk abreast. The KoM is 19 mph!

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 4 years ago
6 likes

Thats my FOI response - at most 2 complaints (one person via council, another via MP - possibly the same?).  Plus no evidence of actual collisions. 

An accessibility assesment that relates to the original scheme, not the new barriers.

Mind you if it takes 1or 2 complaints to put barriers in, surely several dozen complaints against will see them removed? 

So, come on, south manchester cyclists write to Stockport Council to complain - lets see if we can get these stupid barriers removed.

Avatar
EddyBerckx replied to CygnusX1 | 4 years ago
4 likes
CygnusX1 wrote:

Thats my FOI response - at most 2 complaints (one person via council, another via MP - possibly the same?).  Plus no evidence of actual collisions. 

An accessibility assesment that relates to the original scheme, not the new barriers.

Mind you if it takes 1or 2 complaints to put barriers in, surely several dozen complaints against will see them removed? 

So, come on, south manchester cyclists write to Stockport Council to complain - lets see if we can get these stupid barriers removed.

Grey barriers against a grey background, no reflectives...they would never, ever in a million years install something so dangerous on a road. Pretty typical on cycle paths up and down the country though.

Pages

Latest Comments