This one’s not strictly a cycling story, but it is funny.
According to a press release sent to us today by Warwickshire Police (so you know it’s going to be good), a motorist was handed six points on his licence, along with fines and charges amounting to over £1000, earlier this month after failing to provide information about the identity of the driver in relation to a speeding offence.
After the owner’s vehicle was caught at 58mph in a 50mph zone last December, the 28-year-old was sent a Notice of Intended Prosecution requiring him to confirm who was behind the wheel.
But instead of ‘fessing up, the historically-minded motorist decided to send several documents quoting medieval laws and customs – including Clause 39 of the Magna Carta, which guarantees freedom from arbitrary punishment without due process – and, bizarrely, demands for millions of pounds.
Not sure what Pope Innocent III would make of that ‘defence’, mind you…
“Let me be clear, all drivers on UK roads are subject to the statutory requirements of the Road Traffic Act, Warwickshire Police’s Dave Valente said in a statement. “This includes driving licences, vehicles being MOT’d, insured and taxed. It also means complying with the speed limit, and the consequences of failing to do so.
“Drivers who respond with extensive demands based on ancient medieval customs, will not evade prosecution.”
Good to know.
However, Valente also noted that this reliance from law-breaking drivers on medieval rights and charters is, oddly, on the increase in the UK.
“Unfortunately this is not a one off case,” he said. “We have noticed an increase in those who quote this type of material, to avoid the consequence of a speeding offence.
“This driver found out the hard way, trying to avoid a speeding prosecution could cost them a lot more than responding in accordance with the Road Traffic Act.”
Add new comment
39 comments
“How to not die at the Foot of the Walk – A Guide”
I sincerely hope that this installation was risk assessed for cyclists, and that some enterprising person from Auld Reekie will be doing an FoI to get it.
If that driver wishes to be tried under a medieval law, I hope they're willing to receive a medieval punishment!
Perhaps they're hoping for trial by combat but the participants have to turn up in the vehicle used at the time?
Someone did try that! (Different weapons though) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1416262/Court-refuses-trial-by-c...
So glad we have a distinction between evil road and pavement hogging Cyclists and Mountain Bikers.
https://www.peeblesshirenews.com/news/23610269.innerleithen-biker-says-a...
Well it appears when you dig a bit deeper, that the pavement hogging cyclists were the mountain bikers and the moaning 'mountain biker' who nearly ran over a cyclist cleaning their bike while trying to park their car, was actually a gravel bike rider returning from a UCI race.
The only two events that were recently in those locations at the same time were:
https://www.sportive.com/events/the-gralloch-trek-uci-gravel-world-serie...
and
https://tweedlove.com/events/yt-tweedlove-king-queen-of-the-mountain-2023/
I was in the Eurostar despatch today discussing taking one of my eBikes to Paris. Only if you can dismantle it and get it in a small box, I was informed. But it's an eBike and I can dismantle it but it's a hassle and can't we just put it on the train like before Covid. No, the Eurostar guy replied. You forgot about brexit. Er? I grunted. Yes it has to be checked by customs and for that reason it has to be packed. You will notice, he continued, there are no benefits to brexit. No sh*t Sherlock. I regularly travel between London and Paris and I can confirm that moving stuff between these two close by cities involves, hassle, time, paperwork and cost. Because of brexit. And what are the benefits again? Imagine if I was trying to sell bikes. Before brexit Eurostar would let you travel separately from your bike. You could leave one day and the bike could arrive a few days later. Now you have to accompany it - because of brexit inflicted customs and friction. Self inflicted stupidity.
On this basis shouldn't car owners need to put their car in a box at the ferry port with customs seals and full paperwork and admin fee paid!
And what happens if you want to cycle onto a ferry?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jun/27/car-road-deaths-ri...
Where is the outrage? Behind some dusty files and tupperware in the small cupboard mostly reserved for some other outrage. Outrage that gets taken out - for a bit - more frequently. Like how it's terrible that people (and not infrequently kids) are killing others (including kids) with guns.
It's probably having to share space with the another very small bit of outrage that the ready availability of guns means that there are a lot of successful "no-one expected..." suicides in households with guns. I'm not even sure that counts as outrage though because of the belief that "they'd just kill themselves another way".
That's probably Gun Godwin!
I'd imagine that Delingpole isn't alone in that he appears to support cycling as a sport (especially when it's being done far far away from where he might ever drive) but hates cycling as a mode of transport.
Being a fan of congestion, pollution and climate change, and opposed to good health are the "obvious reasons" I'm guessing
Because he hates everything and anything that isn't about posh-boy privilege and nepotism. He really is full of bile.
Indeed.
Priviliged private education, before being part of the illuminati at Oxford University.
Fuck the hoi polloi, eh James?
.
Unlike - oh, I dunno - yourself, perhaps?
.
What's your positive contribution to... anything really?
“I’m ideologically opposed to bicycles for all the obvious reasons,”
Yes indeed James, you are. Those obvious reasons obviously being prejudice, bigotry and stupidity.
“Say what you like about those infuriating, car-impeding, road-hogging cyclists but the ones who participate in the big international races don’t half have some balls.”
Whereas you appear to have one less than Hitler.
Leith walk: There are some cyclist priority lights with "not in use" tape over them, so eventually traffic will be held back whilst cyclists go forward. But for now, they should not have opened that cycle lane, it's a death trap. I would also like to see that pointless kerbed island removed, someone is going to crash into it and there's absolutely no need to make cyclists swerve like that to go straight ahead.
Yeah - without this connecting to a cycle path (or - let's get sadly realistic here -
a bus / cycle lane) this looks a bit lost. Obviously the idea is that this serves as corner protection like the classic Dutch designs. Unfortunately - probably "because pedestrians" - this one doesn't appear to have much upstand at all. (Not that it would make much difference for a generation, as cars, lorries and buses swing over it...)The other side of course features the special "diet cycle lane".
This point was one of the guddles from early days of the design if I recall - it was "the tram must continue down Constitution Street" - taking up the space.
Again - maybe in practice while dangerous this isn't the worst thing - I suspect lots of folks wanting to go left (east) will either cut across further up (past Tescos?) to avoid the junction or just take to their feet here - you'll be jostling with a fair few pedestrians at various points during the day.
Zooming out a bit if something could be sorted out on Easter Road (for connections via / to Leith Links and on to the east) or Bonnington Road (connections to WOL / Paths to north) that would ease things a bit.
Some of my colleagues think I have "some balls" cycling to work because I'm sharing the same space with drivists with attitudes like Delingpole.
James Delingpole is a horrible, horrible man. A professional contrarian and snob, who only gets a job, and listened to, because of his privileged upbringing. He has nothing worth saying, yet brays loudly to anyone listening.
(my favourite James Delingpole moment is when he tried to explain to a professor of climate physics why the professor was wrong in saying that climate change was real, because of something that Delingpole heard in an English literature lecture at university). https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-aerosols-research-misinterpreted-t...
Delingpole would appear to be one of those aerosols.
Re the Tommy Voeckler sat nav voice.
My now ancient (and redundant) Garmin sat nav came with a voucher to download a free "premium" voice for it. To give you an idea how long ago this was, I turned down Simpsons characters and heaven knows what else to be guided by then Garmin rider Dave Zabriskie. Even after 5 years of driving around with it he still had the capacity to make the whole family laugh.
The built in Toyota lady I now rely on has never made me laugh.
I used to have a Volvo where the only choice was male or female, I chose the female despite her sounding like a german dominatrix, I quite liked it TBH
I just want a Mandalorian one that only says "this is the way"
I do too.
DZ on the sat-nav sounds like great company.
If I was driving in an unfamiliar city (they are not my natural habitat) I'd like John Ogmios to be guiding me round with his calming zen motoring observations.
I'd like the sat-nav voice from the Armstrong and Miller show.
The politically incorrect satnav? "Turn left at the job centre. Look at them all, queuing up to fill their pockets with your money..."
Very un-PC I must admit. Had to share a car with someone who had Yoda as the voice - quite amusing at first, soon became unbearable.
Pages