Big drama at La Vuelta yesterday evening, the fallout from Richard Carapaz's crash rumbling on and turning into everyone's favourite form of post-stage analysis — social media outrage.
The EF Education-EasyPost climber's crash was caught by the TV cameras with around 93km to go, Carapaz seen picking himself up and quickly getting back on the bike, a replay (frustratingly blocked by a tree at the crucial moment) showing the moment he fell from his bike having left the road. Why the rider, who dropped to fourth on GC, fell was a matter his team boss Jonathan Vaughters had an opinion on, taking to social media and sharing the footage with the caption: "Well, that was pretty mean."
Just 20 minutes later he shared a slightly longer video again, this time saying: "Accidents happen in cycling. We all know that. It's a rough sport. But this was not an accident."
The tree blocking the footage makes it hard to say if it was just a touch of wheels or something worse, although EF's team boss is fairly confident in his take on events. Race leader Ben O'Connor is fairly confident in his too, the Decathlon–AG2R La Mondiale rider posting three minutes after Vaughters, and wrote: "We never tried to cause a crash, and never pushed someone off the road."
O'Connor's Twitter account has since been deleted, the Aussie climber's post also addressing the fact the UCI gave yellow cards to four of his teammates (Victor Lafay, Cyril Dessel, Bruno Armirail and Geoffrey Bouchard) for obstructing the road, the team spreading across the road in order to prevent more riders joining the breakaway.
It's fairly standard practice and while Decathlon–AG2R La Mondiale may feel unfairly singled out for something that has gone unpunished more times than it's worth remembering, the fact is the UCI rules state it is an offence, namely: "Obstruction by a rider or vehicle in order to prevent or delay the movement of another rider or vehicle."
Plenty pointed this out to O'Connor during last night's social media discussion, the team not getting much sympathy from fans watching on. O'Connor tagged the UCI in his post and asked: "What kind of dangerous move do you think my teammates Bouchard, Lafay and Armirail [did] that merited a yellow card? The road was blocked by us, like in every race after the breakaway leaves. We never tried to cause a crash, and never pushed someone off the road."
The answer to O'Connor's question is likely the six words that begin his second sentence, although the team will probably still have questions about the consistency of enforcement of the 'blocking' rule considering, as O'Connor pointed out, they're far from the only team to have ever spread out across the road at the head of the peloton.
Quite amusingly, given all the drama elsewhere, Decathlon–AG2R La Mondiale's social media admin summarised their team's day out as: "After a splendid job by the team to filter out the breakaway, Ben was unfortunately just a hair's breadth away from finishing the last climb with his rivals for the Red Jersey. He gives back 37s to Primož Roglič."
Needless to say, there were more than a few people responding to that post too...
Add new comment
19 comments
Well done Steve Bate! Amazing man, not only five Paralympic medals now (two golds, two silvers and a bronze) but has climbed the fearsome El Capitan in Yosemite three times, including being the first visually impaired person to climb it solo. Never met him but feel an affinity as I own his one-time road bike: I still keep his name sticker on it to remind me not to give in to health limitations.
The "bump" is an optical illusion. It's actually a gully about 0.5" deep that's been painted to look like a great big ramp to stop pedestrians tripping in it. It's quite convincing though. The painters did a good job.
Even if it was totally flat I wouldn't ride it, too many driveways, not enough separation from pedestrians. It's safer on the road even among the idiots driving
Indeed. The first time (and last for many years) I used one, a motorist decided to drive onto it just in front of me, so I ended up falling off and breaking my arm.
Might help if some of their employees didn't appear to be actively trying to prevent people cycling by rendering their bikes unrideable.
POLICE OUR STREETS
The reason why cycle very little on the roads now is because of the following experiences with:
Reckless speeding drivers
Distracted phone/infotainment drivers
Drugged/drunken drivers (recently witnessed driver inhaling NOx)
Thuggery from car passengers/moped/motorbike riders knocking cyclists over
Armed violent bike jackings.
Providing a few more miles of cycle lanes will do nothing to sort out the perils listed above.
Only a massive reversal in the decline in roads policing will sort out these issues.
I'm with you on "cycle lanes". In fact almost everywhere cycling has stopped declining or even grown separate cycle paths (where motor traffic is heavy / fast) and improved junctions have been shown to be "necessary, if not sufficient". That's in addition to motor traffic volume and speed reduction across our "streets" to ensure that where we need cyclists to share with drivers it works.
The reason "we" (cyclists) cycle very little on roads may be, but the reason "we" (UK population) don't is ... a bit more complicated, I think you'll find.
Highly incomplete summary: where it's easy to drive we'll drive, out-group, inconvenient / not obvious this be an "improvement" to my life, "unsafe" (multiple ways).
For one - the raw statistics show that cycling is very safe in terms of KSIs. I agree this doesn't speak to "I thought I was going to die".
Looking the other way round you'll certainly find variable policing but all of the above issues in places like NL, Scandinavia, Seville ... and even lesser cycling places like Germany (a rather mixed story for mass cycling!) and even Paris. And yet they're all generally well above most places in the UK in terms of fraction of journeys cycled.
FWIW lots of UK surveys (salt cellar at ready...) have people citing "safety". I suspect this is ultimately a proxy for "doesn't feel / look like it would feel safe or stress-free". (I think "convenience" and "socially acceptable" / "status-maintaining or enhancing" / "pro-social activity" enter in here). There are multiple types of "safety" to consider also.
Given the UK has (to us) a LOT of "low hanging fruit" of obvious road offenses / police not responding to "open and shut" cases AND there has been a drop in police per head of population for some time ... it may seem "obvious" that "police it better" will "fix the roads". Again a long and complex story but see reasons above, and also that I think people seriously underestimate the cost it would take for "dramatic" improvements (we're talking the entire criminal justice system).
Why has cycling adopted a field sports disciplinary system, and not a racing one? It makes no sense at all. Time penalties, including a stop-go, etc would be better, not cards......
All sorts of non-neutralising incidents could make that unfair - not to mention that they will have to then fight back to the peloton expending more energy.
I'm sticking to sitting on the fence until we see how it affects racing long term.
Also, bike racing is very different to motor racing. An F1 style punishment system wouldn't work.
Stop-go penalties wouldn't work because if a penalty was rescinded on appeal after the day's racing just taking the minute or whatever a rider had been penalised off their time wouldn't compensate for the additional energy that rider would have had to spend getting back to the peloton after the penalty. The penalty card system was introduced to stop riders simply accepting time penalties for illegal behaviour when they made no difference; outside the GC contenders it doesn't really matter to most riders if they have a few minutes deducted, whereas the threat of being thrown off the race and being unable to support their leader for two yellow card offences is one they will have to take seriously.
Didn't we used to dock race time as a penalty for racing rule breaking ?
I think the issue here is the yellow card system is too vague, it applies to all manner of rule transgressions, some more safety critical than others.
But like F1 if the people handing out the penalties aren't consistent it causes alot of problems.
If blocking the road, which is against the rules is a yellow card now, apply it everytime it happens. But we know they won't, hence O'Connors valid complaint
Yes indeed, but as I mentioned it made no odds to anyone except GC contenders, if you're a domestique expected to lose hours in the mountains what do you care about a 10 minute penalty?
Maybe the best solution would be to start hitting directeurs sportif with financial penalties instead of riders, I reckon team orders might change pretty quickly then.
Docking race time fails unless support rider who offends has every rider on their team, including leader, docked enough to affect team leader's position in race. It's a team sport, as we keep insisting. Otherwise end up with football's approach of 'taking one for the team'
You could dock it off the team classification. That would be effective against Movistar anyway...
It's standard practice to issue fines, but the yellow card thing is new, and potentially more consequential. It seems like this is what O'Connor's complaining about - it's not that it's typically 'gone unpunished', but that the punishment here is higher, and one that's supposed to be more for dangerous actions, rather than just unsporting or technical infringements.
I feel sorry for AG2R on the fact they are the first team to be rightfully punished for a widely used illegal tactic. Hopefully, if the UCI remains consistent going forward, their complaints will soften over time.
No way the UCI is going to be consistent on this. Blocking is as old as the sport itself, and comes in many grades and guises. It would be a tough one to police, and the UCI have a history of making arbitrary judgements.
I honestly didn't know until now that it was banned, I can remember back in the day when La Vie Claire, Banesto etc would set up a "rolling roadblock" at the front of the peleton on narrow roads and it would be spoken of admiringly as smart tactics.
We'll see what happens once the likes of Visma or UAE do it.
Of course, being cynical I would say no action would be taken.