If, like me, you’ve been glued to the cyclo-cross this winter (apologies family and friends), then you will have noted the contrasting fortunes of the two superstars of the men’s side of the sport: Wout van Aert and Mathieu van der Poel.
Jumbo-Visma rider Van Aert has been in imperious form, dominating each of his five cyclo-cross starts this season, including back-to-back solo wins in Dendermonde and Zolder over the Christmas holidays.
Van der Poel, on the other hand, had been sidelined with a knee injury sustained in an innocuous training crash, and while his performance and second place behind his Belgian rival on Sunday (his first cyclo-cross race of the season) sparked hopes for some spectacular showdowns over the next month, he faded dramatically the following day in Zolder and failed to finish.
A recurring back injury, described by the Dutchman’s Alpecin-Fenix team as "a swelling on an intervertebral disc", also means Van der Poel will miss the next few races over the new year, and possibly the rest of the cyclo-cross season.
While injury may well rule Van der Poel out of January’s world championships in Fayetteville, Arkansas, Van Aert is remaining tight-lipped over his own plans to race for the rainbow jersey, after his coach Marc Lamberts claimed that his rider might skip the Worlds to better prepare for the spring classics on the road.
As things stand heading into 2022, the biggest event in cyclo-cross might, for very different reasons, be missing its two biggest names. Step forward Tom Pidcock, perhaps?
Add new comment
23 comments
That Bora strip is a big improvement. And the UCI have treated Schleck Cycles appallingly. Is it in their mission statement to shaft smaller players?
yeah Im not seeing the issue with the Bora strip.
As for Schleck Cycles team, totally agree, how can it be right they were forced to change their kits which had the precedent of use in that colour style, whilst the other teams who clearly are going to be the ones colour clashing during the WWT dont ? At least it looks like they sold all the kit now, and their revised version looks fairly smart for a last minute change.
We've only heard one side of the Schleck Cycles story, though. It's possible they were just a bit tardy registering their kit for the season, so the others got approved on a first-come-first-served basis.
That party political broadcast tweet was the least convincing thing I've seen since last week's Boris BS. Never mind jumping on the bandwagon, they're jumping on their bikes; or at least someone's bikes. If cllr Joyce is so convinced of the benefits of cycling, why did he post his ludicrous tweet about the park being a velodrome.
While I'm quite glad his test was negative, that hardly seems justification for destroying the ambience of a park by driving through it, which begs the question why wasn't he cycling through it? Or does he only ride bikes for frankly pathetic political tweets?
The clown for East Sheen, Seamus Joyce, and his cycling buddies were not wearing hiviz or lids and appeared to all cycle off down the pavement (Exit stage left, pursued by a bear).
As for the second clown, trying valiantly to ride a bike, that looks like it deserved SPDs, in brown leather brogues.... is it possible, just possible, that he hasn't been near a bike since he was 12?
The Dream Team eh? Why should East Sheen tremble?
You're out of luck if you're looking for a running partner. I hear he only runs solo.
Would you get mine while you're there....
Even if he agrees to run with you it's pretty stressful, he keeps up a pace that's really Frantic, it's something to Witness, it's almost like he's a Fugitive, but there's a Clear and Present Danger of getting left behind.
Mine's the navy pea jacket if you're going...
I don't believe he's that fast - unless he's taking Extraordinary Measures
And He's still the fastest ever on the Kessel Run!
If only he knew that parsec is a distance
the guardians of the canon have stitched up that gaff, it was covered in Solo. The falcon achieved the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs by taking shortcuts (skirting nearer black holes than thought possible) calculated by its advanced navigational computer. Most craft could only makes it in 20.
Is that how he finds the time to moonlight as a car dealer in the Borders? https://www.harrisonsford.co.uk/
Reading through the twitter replies does raise a valid question for me as a non Londoner. Why do people drive through that park? Is it a 'through route' or a shortcut, or do they just drive through there to watch the geese?
There are good car routes to the north, south and east of the park, but it is unquestionably a useful ratrun for those travelling up the west side, from Kingston gate to Richmond gate - it's also used as a ratrun when there are incidents on the A3 etc. In terms of visitors, there are carparks by/near all the main entrances, but many people have their favourite bits to visit - Pen Ponds or the Isabella Plantation being the main ones - and so may drive halfway round the park to reach the nearest carparks. Both these favourites are well under a mile's walk from the nearest "gate" carpark (the park is only 2.5 miles or so across at its widest points) but apparently perfectly fit and healthy adults have to park right by them to go for a walk...ideally the roads would be completely closed to motors except for access to the gate carparks and a shuttle bus could be provided for the elderly and disabled; there was one previously but it was stopped for Covid reasons, I think the RPS did promise it would return when it was safe.
This is part of car driving psychology, and I'm also prone to the temptation. Drive to supermarket, spaces abundant close to the car park entrance and exit. But keep going to get nearer to the supermarket door, investing 5 mins of driving to save 2 mins of walking. Do shopping, then join queue to get out of car park, behind those who parked next to the exit.
It's insane, but I think nearly all drivers do it, and that often includes me. I dare say that I'm not the only wibbler here who gets sucked into this madness at least from time to time.
Oh totally, before we got shot of the car last year I was always doing that against Mrs.H's wishes - "Let's park here and walk," "Weeellll, we could but if we join that slow-moving traffic jam we might end up a hundred yards closer..."
The odd thing is I love walking and will often get off a train or bus earlier than I need to in order to walk a bit further if I can, but seated in a car some instinct appears to take over telling me that I must get as close to my destination as possible before employing my legs. Weird.
Ive always parked the furthest away from the entrance, because I dont mind the walk anyway, but more importantly I get lots of space left around me so that I dont end up with dents in my car from people incapable of parking properly.
This will be my new year's resolution - along with better chain hygiene.
Don't you find some always parks next to you when you do that?
occassionally, which I do find annoying but its still better than the guarantee of someone parking next to you.
Me too, I like the extra walk and I hate door dings. I always park furthest away and with a forward facing exit direction. Even so, it is surprising how often on returning to the car and finding vehicles in the adjacent spaces when there are plenty of double, triple or more contiguous spaces available nearby. It's almost as though they like to huddle together for warmth or mutual protection.
As Rendel says, people use it as an alternative to the A307 or the A3, but I'm not convinced it is any quicker than the actual roads. I'm sure some people drive through to look at the deer - cars slowing for deer are common. Trade vehicles are technically banned, but they also drive through in large numbers. It's treated as just another road, not a park, essentially.
Same problem in Regent's Park. No deer, but lots of speeding traffic rat running from centre ville to Camden and Primrose `Hill. It's horrible to cycle around sometimes as the motor vehicles go really fast.