Someone, quick, get the champagne!
Because Belfast – the antithesis of a cycling city if you’ve ever seen one, the anti-Amsterdam if you will – is set for a £580,000 investment in active travel infrastructure, Northern Ireland’s infrastructure minister John O’Dowd announced this week.
Brilliant news, I hear you cry, especially considering Belfast currently boasts just 2km of protected cycle lanes, with whole swathes of the city, particularly in the north and west, cut off from anything approaching safe – or even rudimentary – active travel infrastructure, thanks to years of underinvestment and governmental apathy.
> "I get more abuse on my bike than in my work": Cyclist death sparks MP to highlight "dire situation of underinvestment" in cycling, urges some drivers to change "irrational attitudes"
Oh wait, hold on a second…
According to O’Dowd, that half a million plus won’t actually be invested in growing Belfast’s cycling network – a project which has juddered to a halt four years since it was first announced – and will instead, bizarrely, go towards upgrading an existing 1.2km protected cycle path in the south of the city.
“This substantial investment includes reconstruction and improvement of the existing segregated cycle track and footway along the Stranmillis Embankment, between Ormeau Road and Governors Bridge,” the Sinn Féin minister said in a statement announcing the £580,000 upgrades.
“The cycle track will be one of the first schemes to benefit from new intuitive red surfacing and splayed kerbs to increase safety and usable width for cycling, while the footway reconstruction will significantly improve the pavement surface for pedestrians along the route.
“I am committed to ensuring that active travel is an attractive option for those who want to walk, wheel and cycle for many of the shorter everyday journeys. Part of this commitment includes maintaining the existing assets that we have to ensure that they remain attractive to users.”
> Allowing taxis in bus lanes over Christmas a “huge step backwards” that will “put cyclists at risk”, say cycling campaigners
However, it’s fair to say that cyclists in Belfast – where taxi drivers are being allowed to use bus lanes as part of trial scheme aiming to “ease congestion” – aren’t too pleased with the refusal to build cycle lanes elsewhere in the city, in favour of touching up a bike path already in place.
Cue the memes…
And of course the classic Star Wars one:
“There are just two miles of protected cycle lanes in all of Belfast,” the Northern Ireland branch of Sustrans posted on social media in the wake of O’Dowd’s announcement.
“Why spend more than half a million pounds in ‘improving’ this well-used foot and cycle path, when there is nothing of this standard in North and West Belfast?
“If you want to improve connection to Queen’s University and Botanic, why not build a cycle path from Dublin Rd through Botanic Gardens? What is the diversion given this will be closed until May? Why disrupt this route again after it was closed for so long while flood wall was built?”
In response to Sustrans’ questions, the Department for Infrastructure (DfI) said that the works were “necessary to maintain the existing Belfast Cycling Network …the footway has deteriorated due to the mature tree roots and as part of the work to improve this, kerbs will need replaced and consequently the cycle track resurfaced.”
And Sustrans’ reply? “Please build the network!”
Meanwhile, describing the announcement as “shocking”, the Belfast Cycle Campaign said: “When the pace of constructing active travel infrastructure has been GLACIAL for the past 20 years – why is the DfI improving one of the best existing cycle lanes? We are all for cycle lane improvement... but this is ridiculous!”
“The DfI is a joke,” added Queen’s lecturer Dom Bryan. “You can’t make this stuff up. They are simply doing up the one bit of protected cycle lane we already have. Someone needs to investigate how that department runs.”
“Pioneering Industrialists DFI issue a limited edition of their seminal 1992 debut album ‘Stranmillis Cycle Lane’ featuring new cover art, liner notes by JO’Dowd, bonus tracks, and crossings,” wrote campaign group CYCUL, brilliantly.
“DFI have suffered severe create block since the debut but hope this keeps the fans happy.”
Come on lads, when’s the new album?!
> “If they can’t build cycle lanes, devolve bloody powers to us and we’ll do it”: Belfast Council slams Northern Ireland government’s “joke” delivery of cycling infrastructure – as just 2.8km of bike lanes installed in two years
“They’re doing the easy thing, repairing an existing route rather than investing in new routes and expanding the infrastructure. Useless Department,” said Brian.
“It’s an easy and non-car disruptive thing to do. Gives the impression of investment in sustainable infrastructure without being in any way effective,” agreed Phil.
And while the need for the upgrades has been widely called into question, other local cyclists have noted that the diversion put in place while the works take place leaves a lot to be desired, with Matthew describing the alternative route as “meticulously planned”:
“Predictably, DfI’s diversion amounts to a sign stating ‘cyclists dismount and use footway’. Said footway being on the other side of the busy road,” noted Gary.
“Why couldn’t they suspend on-street parking on the Lyric Theatre side and create a temporary cycle lane for the duration of the work?”
Yes, but that wouldn’t be non-car disruptive, would it, Gary?
Add new comment
16 comments
Proof that ebikes are evil:
https://www.cyclingelectric.com/news/500w-e-bike-consultation-rejected
Mordor Intelligence found that the market was on track to reach £666m!
😲
I don't need proof! Faith has shown me the True Path from which there must be no deviation
Well, sorta. On the other hand the existing players maybe aren't wearing horns (they'd make the helmet less useful):
I'm slightly surprised all has worked out as it has - but content. If only the powers that be would go on to be more clear that the e-whatevers are right out. (Never mind the Surrons "not even pretending to be a bicycle" motorbikes). And motivate the police to grab them when ridden illegally - that is, almost anywhere. As it is even mainstream high street shops are happy to flog them.
As road.cc's sister site showed, if you really really want (and have some money and time) you can already legitimately ride a "speed pedelec" around the UK (with plates, motorcycle helmet, insurance etc.)
...so I went out ram-raiding.
Nice idea from Elastic Interface and all, but could they not have found an image to use where the driver was actually giving the requisite 1.5m clearance?
UCI forces Ritchey to ditch its iconic rainbow logo
I don't think I'm up to date with modern idioms, so is that "woke" or not?
No idea, but I'm wondering why the IOC haven't come knocking on the UCI's door for using the Olympic colours.
Its a bollocks clickbait quote from Road.Cc the UCI didnt force Ritchey to do anything, Ritchey declined to meet the UCI's licensing terms when the existing agreement ran out. Whether they were egregious or not Road.cc couldn't be arsed to find out.
Look, I'm glad the bus is ok, but the question all cyclists are concerned with is: is the bike OK?
The Guernsey Press is right to say that the bus and its occupants were undamaged in the collision with the cyclist. I have several times dragged the unobservant, stupid bus driver from their cab and given them a severe kicking for cutting me up: in my mind at least.
And today in the papers we have police saying that "selfish drivers" must stop speeding. Selfish. Going at 164mph. Selfish. Every way you look at police and general attitudes to driving safely and its a joke. Its not selfish, its unbelievably dangerous. The punishments for doing it are a joke.
South today on BBC breakfast said 24,000 drivers have been caught doing more than 100mph, and that's caught and we know how ever present those roads police units are.
Otherwise law abiding...
The public knows that high-speed Lycra cyclists are the big danger on our roads.
Doping is indeed about shades of grey, not black and white. However, the issue is that USPS and their alpha males were a shade of grey so dark, so absolutely deep, that barely any light escaped from it.
" i didn't invent assault with a deadly weapon , but .... " " i didn't invent drink driving , but .... " " i didn't invent murder , but .... "
Shades of grey? So poorly written I didn't get past page 2.