Hooray, everyone's favourite (former) GBNews producer and anti-cycling bingo enthusiast Charlotte Gill is back at it, this time with something a bit more flamboyant and swashbuckling than what her previous attempts have been, some might say.
Her hall of fame highlights include the article in the eye-openingly conservative magazine The Critic, criticising a new study on Low Traffic Neighbourhoods, despite failing to address any of the study’s findings, as well as the elite, deluxe edition of the anti-cycling bingo with a top of the shop entering, ticking off every single uninspired checkbox: from "a war is being waged against car drivers", "a ‘Lycra Lobby’ of cycling activists and eco wonks", "I don’t drive, enjoy cycling and probably have a relatively low carbon footprint", "an assault on democracy"…
Oh before I forget, she was also behind bringing up an argument on Twitter in March that it’s mums who should stand up and oppose the dreaded Lycra lobby – because they can’t “cart around children” by bike, apparently – a claim swiftly shut down by loads of women posting pictures of them doing exactly the same activity, including Bath's bicycle mayor Saskia Heijltjes.
> “Oh dear, can you imagine being a mum carting around children”: Bath’s bicycle mayor shuts down GB News producer’s claim that mums need cars
Gill, who last month left her role as producer at GB News, was most recently under fire for comparing the 20mph speed limit in Wales to cyclists needing stabilisers. I know the list is long...
Well now, Gill has been on an expedition on the streets of London, and for once, she couldn't stop herself from applauding a cyclist, albeit only for a tiny bit of inspiration. Following in the footsteps of one "lycra-loving" Jeremy Vine, she strapped on a body cam (her iPhone) and took to the streets, becoming the "pedestrian version" of the Channel 5 presenter and "play cyclists at their own game, filming their transgressions".
Lo and behold, the inception of the one and only 'Chaz Cam', as christened by her.
> “Perhaps cars should have great big beanbags taped to them, too?” GB News producer slammed for comparing 20mph speed limits to cyclists requiring stabilisers
She wrote on her blog: "It goes without saying that cyclists aren’t as dangerous as cars on average, and of course, not everyone cycles badly. But too often you hear “it’s only a few bad eggs giving others a bad name” to minimise the number of naughty cyclists - when the issue is actually quite pronounced, as I have found. I would guess it’s more like half of cyclists behaving badly on the road, not a minority."
And in case you didn't feel like clicking on the link above this very fine day, worry not! Your live blog host has done his homework and read through Gill's handiwork, laying down all the horrible, spiteful and malicious deeds cyclists are responsible for.
It begins with probably the most common one — one which we at road.cc have also brought up in our discussions on the live blog: Going through red lights. "I lost count of the number of cyclists doing this on my day out with the Chaz Cam," she wrote.
"Although you might say I was being pedantic (well, I was pretending to be the pedestrian version of Jeremy Vine) and that cyclists may as well go through the light if no pedestrians are waiting, I found they do even when a pedestrian is there. One female cyclist dashed out at me as soon as the pedestrian light went green (see below).
> Are red-light jumping cyclists "great adverts" for cycling? Jeremy Vine seems to think so...
Alright, next up, cyclists on phones. She said: "It wasn’t unusual to see cyclists riding with one hand or none on their handlebars, as if thinking they looked extremely cool while doing so.
"One cyclist, who a van white beeped at, due to his being dangerously close in front, sped away, only to look at something other than the road (my guess being his phone)."
> "If you don’t like cyclists going through red lights, support proper cycling infrastructure": Calls for better cycling infrastructure after cyclists jumping lights goes viral
Also in the findings of the investigation were the age-old "lighting issues" and "riding on the pavement" (cough, yesterday's live blog comes to mind, cough). And finally, she took aim at another easy target, delivery riders, claiming that they were just "bad cyclists" rushing through people for "tiny sums of money".
In conclusion? She said that the "Chaz Cam investigations" have hardly convinced her that "the UK is ready for a cycling revolution".
"The reality, in my opinion, is that half of cyclists behave well, and half of cyclists don’t. It’s definitely not the case that 'most cyclists follow the rules'," she said. "They don’t - because they perceive themselves as "the green and the good" of British society. It’s also generally my experience that most cyclists are male (and young), and the most aggressive ones almost always so, countering councils’ propaganda of inclusive transport."
So if not all cyclists are bad, and the ones which are do not cause nowhere nearly as harm or damage as a bad motorists, shouldn't by the same benchmark we all should be in agreement that the UK is also not ready for a driving revolution? Ah well.
That was quite a way to start my Wednesday, is this all a painstakingly wonderful and detailed attempt at parody or just a lousy attempt with poor arguments for cheap clicks? I feel I'm losing my mind here, help me figure this out...
Add new comment
91 comments
With consumer demand falling , cycle retailers closing and manufacturers going by out of business it doesn't look as if the great cycling revolution is happening any time soon the essential problem being the vast majority of the population aren't really interested
If the ex GBeebies producer filmed pedestrians crossing on the 'Red man' I bet it would be more than 50%
Though to be fair (to pedestrians, not to her) crossing on the red man is not an offence whereas riding through a red light is.
I was thinking the same thing, so had a look. Rule 21 & 22 have some fun wording:
That fun "should" word again
"Do not" here - rather than "must not"
I know "should" is advisory and "must" is compulsory - but what about a simple "do not"?
There is, of course, the point that the pedestrian could simply step to the side of the crossing and cross the road without using the lights...
Wow. GBeebies. I bet you sat up all night thinking of that. Anyone who has a view which differs from yours is probably thick and racist.
GB News viewing and listening figures are beating many other news programs. At least you get opinions from all sides rather than being spoonfed what the likes of BBC spout out.
You should watch it, there's a reason why they are collecting so many awards.
They've won two awards in their history, as far as I can ascertain: Nigel Farage as best news presenter and best breakfast news show, both at this year's TRIC awards. The TRIC awards are about the lowest rung of media awards in terms of prestige, this year they were sponsored by...hang on...GBNews!
I'm sure you can tell us all the other awards I have somehow missed that justify the phrase "so many"?
They won an award last year too. Eamonn Holmes best news presenter, and they were nominated for best news channel. This years awards saw Nigel Farage win best news presenter, best mulit channel news and they had three of the five nominees out of five for best news presenter. It is a refreshing channel to watch. You should try watching it, much better than the BBC, ITN, SKY etc. They are gathering pace and giving the hard left wing news channels a bloody nose.
They were not sponsored by GB News this year, that is a bit tenuous. They were a partner, as were Freesat, SKY, Sony, Samsung, WH Smith, Cello, Freeview, Digital Network to name a few. The award which was sponsored by GB News was won by Talk TV.
Finally, the TRIC awards have been going for around 50 years, much longer than pretty much all the other awards, and the winners are voted for by the general public. Are you suggesting they are rigged?
GB News may not be to the liking of the hard left, but they are growing in popularity as they say what the silent majority are saying. It's usually the very vocal minority who like to shout them down.
So they've won three awards in two years, all from the same third-tier awards organisation - no BAFTAS, no National Television Awards (voted for by the public)? Not quite sure how this justifies describing them as "collecting so many awards".
Ah yes, the BAFTAS, voting the the masked singer as the best entertainment program. Such class. And the national television awards, giving awards to gogglebox.
TRIC Awards Best Reality TV Programme nominee 2021 and 2022: The Masked Singer.
TRIC awards Best Entertainment Programme winner 2021, 2022 and 2023: Gogglebox.
Got any more fish in a barrel you want me to shoot?
In any event, regardless of the quality or otherwise of the awards, the fact remains that GBNews has garnered three in two years, so your claim that they are "collecting so many awards" is manifestly false.
I think the header is too kind to Nickie Aitken MP.
Her "will chop it down" claim was fabricated by herself, not by the Daily Mail.
Interesting little snippet from Parliament today about fuel duty. Jeremy Hunt is appearing before the Treasury Select Committee. Reporting on the Guardian live blog
let us pray 🙏
Is it bad that I really like that sprocket Xmas tree?
Isn't that what you see if you look inside a Rohloff or Pinion gearbox?
EDIT - maybe not enough metal bits...
GB News presenter hates cyclists.
World remains un-shocked.
Tom Harwood - their deputy political editor - is pro-cycling.
https://twitter.com/tomhfh/status/1559840812678144000?lang=en
https://twitter.com/tomhfh/status/1662833457326596100
You cannot have any positive news connected to GB News on here! The wokes will shout you down because nobody can have another view which differs from theirs. They resort to insults.
I await....
Quite hilarious squawking from Charlotte Seagull.
So white minibus man driving up the chuff of a person on a bike and leaning on his hooter is 'the cyclist positioning himself dangerously in front'.
Still in a hole. Still digging for Australia.
Though TBF the lady is from Canada.
Yes, that's a particularly egregious quote. I hadn't realised I've been getting it wrong all these years, and that aggressive tailgaters are actually innocent victims of the dangerous road users in front of them.
Haha look now, all those grasses who film people don't like being filmed themselves! Should be zero complaints from most on here
It may comes a shock to some but "grassing", better known as reporting a crime, is a common occurrence in a democratic society.
Grasses? Bet you're another one of these wankers that doesn't take safety seriously. Shame on you.
His hero is "top road safety expert" Nick Freeman though.
Nobody here has said they don't like being filmed, nor complained that they have been filmed. The videos in what, for now, we shall have to call an 'article' (as if it represented balanced journalism or evidence in any way) are of other people.
The complaints are about the malevolent mischaracterisation of cyclists in general and false equivalence.
I would no more fear being recorded cycling than I do driving, just as I both use a camera on my bike and have a dashcam in the car.
I've probably seen you driving like a C yoU Next Tuesday in one of those dashcam vids that insistently pops up on Arsebook all the time.
When I watch these dashcamshitdriver things on YouTube, I'm never sure if I'm disappointed or relieved that I'm not in that episode.
Oh indeed, we are all, even the most sanctimonious and saintly members of road.cc capable of mistakes. You should try working in broadcast though, to this day if I catch an episode of it'll be alright on the night for fear of seeing myself. Still unsure if the time many moons ago I walked into a studio without checking if it was a rehersal or the actual weather being done.
Ha ha look now, I found your dick using this microscope
Grasses? How old are you? 13?
Pages