The ‘Should I Stay or Should I Go’ transfer saga of the winter is skidding to what, in retrospect, was its inevitable conclusion, with Tom Pidcock parting ways with Ineos, the team with which he turned pro in 2021 and became one the sport’s biggest stars.
But after wins at Amstel Gold, Strade Bianche, and Brabantse Pijl, along with a Tour de France stage win atop Alpe d’Huez, and two Olympic mountain bike titles and a cyclocross world championship, and with a bumper contract that was set to run until 2027, where did it all go wrong for Britain’s biggest cycling talent and the formerly dominant British team?
> “People around Tom Pidcock don’t help,” says Geraint Thomas, as 2018 Tour de France winner weighs in on “c*** situation” and “bull****” at Ineos after Il Lombardia deselection drama
With Ineos – the most successful team of the 2010s – undergoing a prolonged and painful transition period, culminating in a turbulent 2024 that marked the squad’s worst ever season, it’s been clear that tensions have been brewing for some time between Pidcock and the British outfit’s management over a range of issues.
These have included disagreements over race programmes, apparent friction with now-departed DS Steve Cummings, the team’s insistent focus on the Tour de France (and by extension, Pidcock’s GC aspirations), and his multidisciplinary leanings (with a mountain biking trip to Canada last winter apparently opening a rift that was never fully repaired).
(Simon Wilkinson/SWpix.com)
Despite his multidisciplinary success and ability to score big wins, Pidcock himself has also come in for criticism from some quarters for his apparent inability to consistently challenge cycling’s biggest riders, while being one of the sport’s top earners.
And in September, the 25-year-old admitted the internal tensions within the British team “don’t help me perform at my best”.
“It is true that there are currently a number of issues within the team that I have to deal with,” Pidcock told Het Laatste Nieuws in September after an underwhelming Tour of Britain. “And to be honest, they don’t help me to perform at my best.
“I have to think about a lot more than just performance-related things at the moment. And that means that the focus on the things that are really important, namely racing, is not ideal.”
Meanwhile, according to Sporza’s ‘Secret Cyclist’ columnist, Pidcock maintained a “loner” stance within the famously regimented Ineos camp, working with his own coaches and doctors and “doing his own thing”.
(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
Things then came to a head at Il Lombardia, the last monument of the season and one which the Yorkshireman was set to enter as a contender, when Pidcock was dramatically deselected from the Ineos line-up on the eve of the race – and while he was travelling on the team bus on the way to their hotel in Lombardy.
That decision came from the very top of the Ineos senior management tree and was not based on sporting or performance matters, according to both sports director Zak Dempster and Pidcock himself.
Meanwhile, former British champion and Eurosport commentator Brian Smith claimed that Ineos pulled Pidcock from the race because they were unwilling to pay him his contracted performance bonus if he nabbed a big result.
“Just as things were on the up after a turbulent end to the year I am deselected for Lombardia tomorrow”, the Amstel Gold winner posted on social media ahead of the race.
“I am in great shape and was really looking forwarded to it! Good luck to the boys, I guess off season starts early. Thanks for everyone’s support even in the tough times.”
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
That drama in Lombardy also kicked off a protracted transfer saga, as Pidcock’s ongoing presence at the British squad suddenly appeared untenable, with Red Bull Bora-Hansgrohe, Visma-Lease a Bike, and Swiss ProTour squad Q36.5 Pro Cycling all linked to a possible move for the 25-year-old.
Q36.5 – which despite being a second-tier team, would offer Pidcock an environment where he would be the squad’s undisputed leader in whatever races he chooses – soon emerged as the front-runner for the British rider’s signature.
However, talk of a €12 million buyout clause, and claims that Ineos were willing to pay 20 per cent of Pidcock’s salary to facilitate the move, meant that any negotiations were never going to be easy, with Ineos reportedly backing out of a deal last month.
> “Team Circus continues”: Tom Pidcock dropped by Ineos due to risk of bonus payout claims Brian Smith, who says there’s “no fun in numbers-driven cycling anymore” as “gagged” Steve Cummings confirms exit
Pidcock was then spotted at an Ineos get together to watch Manchester United play, seemingly drawing a line under the whole protracted saga.
That is, until the weekend, when whispers emerged once again that Q36.5 were back in talks with Pidcock over a deal for 2025 – which, judging by today’s news, appears to be just around the corner – a development accelerated by his absence from Ineos’ Spanish training camp this week.
(Allan McKenzie/SWpix.com)
So, that appears to be that – the end of arguably the most controversial transfer saga involving a British rider since Brad Wiggins jumped ship from Garmin to the then-brand new Team Sky way back in 2009.
Then, Wiggo’s mod-suited Sky move heralded a new dawn for the future Tour winner, the fledgling team, and British cycling as a whole.
But what does today’s news – the exit of Britain’s biggest star from the sleeping British giant – mean for Pidcock himself, a struggling Ineos squad, and the sport in the UK?
Add new comment
11 comments
Postie delivering, bike: what could possibly go wrong ?
KOM Boomers: they're the ones who learned to pass wide of a parked postal truck.
Re boomers getting KOMs, is it because we have the time to find out of the way lanes, ride them' then rush home and create a segment on which we hold the fastest time for a few hours until the local KOM hunters find it?
¡What a weird, almost personal, attack on Valverde!
Diddums, he's a big boy, he can take it.
It's definitely a personal attack on Valverde, saying that as a convicted cheat it's not appropriate for him to take charge of his national team. Pretty sure most people wouldn't think that was weird though.
The thing that I found weird was the decision to use a picture of him in those awful brown cycling shorts/ socks/ shoes. I mean fine to remind everyone about the doping, but his sponsors made him wear that outfit, and none of us needed to see it!
Agreed, especially strange considering the worship/whitewashed history the entire cycling press lavishes on Eddy Merckx very tainted career.
Indeed, and I love the fact that people are unable to get over the fact that he has done his time. There are plently of revered cyclists out there with the dubious history of being suspected cheaters, but hey, no hypocrisy here.
No mention of the Roadcc youtube channel being hacked? Yesterday evening it was trying to sell me crypto currency. Today it appears to be back up and running but only has the 11 most recent videos. Are the older videos recoverable? For all the grief GCN gets, I always remind myself we have roadcc for actual reviews and opinions that aren't affected by sponsorships. Please can we have an update?
Sorry about this, been a stressful morning! Unfortunately we did have a security breach but the channel should be fully back up and running with no trace of any crypto scam videos. Luckily we nipped it in the bud before any content could be deleted, we're just missing some playlists.
Apologies again if you were trying to watch any of our videos last night and were greeted with spam, it's all fixed and disaster averted to the best of our knowledge.