They say you work hard, but the PR industry works harder — and now in Uber’s latest PR move, you are invited to be a part of a carbon-negative pop-up cycling pub, where you can pedal while sipping on overpriced pints to generate electricity.
The pop-up called 55k Tonnes is set to open in Westminster for two days between October 7-9, claims to be the first-of-its-kind that is capable of generating more electricity than it uses. And it’s aiming to do so by inviting the drinkers to sit on a power bike and pedal — besides being equipped with Pavegen floor, which apparently transforms footsteps into electricity. Oh, and also, there’s “carbon neutral” beers.
The company said that the name 55k Tonnes is to celebrate the 55,000 tonnes of air pollution reduced in London due to Uber's electrification efforts since 2021, with almost 30 per cent of its journey taking place through electric cars in London.
But let’s get to the point, what’s on the tap, you ask? Well, it’s Swell, brewed by South London’s Gipsy Hill Brewing, on draft, a lager made from regeneratively grown, bio-diverse barley from Wildfarmed. The beer app Untappd tells me, Swell is “light and crisp, with refreshing florals and a lick of melon. Everything you want from a lager… just a little bit better for the planet.”
And if you make your way after 5:50pm, you can get yourself a cheeky discount and grab a pint for… £5.50. Yep, that’s London beer prices for you!
So tell me if I’m getting this wrong, it’s basically the infamous beer bikes which appeared in Belfast and Bristol (and Edinburgh too, before it ended up being seized by the police), but you just… sit in one place while reminding yourself to pedal — otherwise you’re not doing your bit to be a good citizen of planet earth and generate some electricity?
> “A bitter end to their day?”: Beer bike seized by Police Scotland citing “safety concerns” and “road traffic offences”
For context, in 2023, each mile that a passenger travelled on Uber resulted in an average generation of 191 grams of CO₂ in Europe (or 119 grams of CO₂ per kilometre), while a 2020 study also found that ride-hailing trips resulted in an estimated 69% more climate pollution, on average, than the trips they displace.
But I’ll give it to them, they tried and it’s an interesting concept… maybe not just for everyone — although, every cyclist who’s dreamed of downing a drink while on your Zwift or Peloton (I say dreamed because if you’ve already done it, why? And yes, we’d definitely like to speak to you), you can now do it with your mates too.
But either way, let us know what do you make of it? If you're in London, are you planning to go down (on a bike, I imagine) and have a pint? Or are you going to give it a skip and stick to the good ol', same ol' ale at your local pub?
Add new comment
67 comments
From the Book of "I know my rights": When the Law inquired of Cain, "Where is thy V5C for thy rover?" Cain arrogantly replied with the question, "Am I my rover's keeper?"
I guess we should be be shocked at the police saying "we can't do anything about vehicle crime because, er ... the criminal didn't legally register it, or did something fiendishly clever and dastardly like put on fake plates", but ...
You'd think the police could apply that logic.
Especially as they use similar logic for cases where the owner declares that the driver at the time of the incident is now "abroad".
The police know they can usually not chase that individual and some use it as a get out so the police apply the penalty to the owner.
I don't understand why this doesn't put a flag on that vehicle and it's stopped at the first ANPR hit as it's suspicious. Even if they don't stop it, don't fixed ANPR cameras give them an idea where and when it's being used most and they could be in the right place at the right time?
"When drivers think they can be faster than cyclists on London roads"
Can anyone else make out the vehicle reg?
Looks illegal to me.
Looks like K9XMX, which is a legal registration but according to the DVLA ought to be on a black Volkswagen. Cloned plate, maybe? Not uncommon round these parts (quite close to me) and getting more common with the rise in LTN cameras. It would explain why the driver feels able to break the law with impunity at a junction that has a number of prominent cameras.
Think it's K9XNX which is a white 330e
Ah good, hopefully the camera person will report them and get some action taken then!
Pretty sure even if the registration itself is legal, the registration plate is illegal - should be "K9 XNX" rather than "K9XN X" and the characters look too close together.
Just got round to reading the BBC article about vigilante camera cyclists.
"Police forces in England and Wales have revealed the public is sending them 150,000 clips every year, with an estimated 90% resulting in drivers being sanctioned."
I wonder where the 90% figure is from, given we know many forces ignore video evidence and the Met police is now failing to do anything on most reports due to the volume of them coming in.
I think that's an error. It does say "Around 90% of videos sent to West Midlands Police's traffic investigations unit result in sanctions against drivers." which is what was said in the interview, so I guess they have misapplied that to all forces.
Aha.
In which case it is worth asking them to amend the article again.
Given the BBC's incorrect use of the word ("vigilante" cyclist)... and how almost none of us (camera cyclists) actually attempt to issue our own punishment on drivers...
Is it worth pointing out that there are actually a lot of VIGILANTE DRIVERS around, as seen by the numerous clips online showing drivers doing punishment passes and other actions that would count as taking the law/punishment into their (driver's) own hands when they incorrectly think cyclists have done something wrong?
Travis Bickle dressed from head to toe in lycra.
Punishment passes are traffic offences and other actions possibly criminal offences; nothing to do with vigilante action, which relates to people taking the actions of law enforcement into their own hands; cough cycling mikey cough..
Punishment passes are prosecuted as careless driving, which is a criminal offence. Recording a crime and reporting it to the police for action is the very opposite of taking law enforcement into your own hands, it's asking the police to enforce the law. Maybe I was wrong about you, I always assumed that you were turfed from the UK police force for gross misconduct, perhaps it was just that even in this day and age the authorities were embarrassed to be employing a police officer who clearly has not the slightest knowledge of the law.
Punishment passes can follow from perceived law breaking by cyclists in the eyes of drivers who are ignorant of the highway code and traffic laws. A punishment pass is an example of vigilante action by using a 1.5T vehicle as a weapon to enforce supposed law infractions.
I wouldn't go anywhere near another Uber product if you already use them for something else ..
Couple had a claim following a crash and life changing injuries in a Uber ... it was rejected because of an Uber Eats agreement forces arbitration and removes ability to claim through courts.
[Article explains far better than me]
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/02/nx-s1-5136615/uber-car-crash-lawsuit-uber...
I think Disney also tried this recently - your injury at Disneyland is covered by the arbitration agreement you signed when you got a free one week trial of Disney+
I'm not sure they could get away with that in the UK because for several years now, following a High Court ruling, Uber drivers count as employees of the company rather than independent self-employed workers, so although their T&Cs still (I believe) have the "no liability" clause they would have trouble sustaining that in court, I don't know if anyone has put it to the test yet. Additionally of course the driver has to have their own insurance so even if the company successfully argues that it has no corporate liability an injured passenger can still make a claim against the individual driver.
Pedantry corner: that's not a decoy e-bike; it's a camouflaged e-bike*. A decoy e-bike would be something that looked like an e-bike, but wasn't (or was, but was a cheap, duff one) deployed to distract people from nicking your actual e-bike.
Also, isn't £5.50 cheap for a pint pretty much anywhere these days?
[* Edit: except OnYerBike is correct - it's a camouflaged e-moped/e-motorbike]
More for pedantry corner.
Thats not Pogs World Championship Jersey --- its his World Champs Skinsuit.
Pedantry corner #3
Bless the UCI, they have 20 pages of rules on where the logos can go:
RE the electrical box "e-bike" - to be clear, I very much assume this would not qualify as an EAPC (for one thing it doesn't appear to have pedals) and so would, in the UK, be considered an electric motorbike.
I'm sure that was in one of the Star Wars sequels…
I've got a thing against cycle generated electricity despite it seeming like a great idea. The problem is the economics and that people are rubbish at producing power - solar panels are almost always cheaper and far more effective. As a gimmick, it works okay, but reminds me too much of a Black Mirror episode.
Wait - are you saying I have to ditch all my dynamo-powered lights?! (Well - "magneto" properly I think?)
Also agree that this is perhaps a fun gimmick but nonsense in general, although there may be specific instances where very inefficient human power is actually a good idea (e.g. because working together fulfils a social function, or having to put effort into something means people value it more, or for reasons of resilience and sustainability it's just not a good idea to start on some high-tech solutions).
More anti cycling bollocks from the BBC
Although they have corrected it.
No comment on the cyclist using the motorway though.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly29m5rrd4o
I believe the cyclist in question is on here at 0715 (and 30 secs)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0023gjg
The corrected version of the article and the piece on BBC Breakfast (which also featured Mikey) are more balanced - though the Breakfast presenters were desperately trying and failing to make it a wedge issue.
I wonder what prompted the amendment.
I hope they learn the meaning of vigilante and how it does NOT apply to most of us.
Where does the cyclist use the motorway?
Pages