Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist driven into by Range Rover driver blasts "victim-blaming twaddle" from police who initially refused to take action

Chief Constable for Northamptonshire Police intervenes to say incident will be "reviewed and reassessed" after initial response said cyclist placed himself "in harm's way"...

A cyclist who captured the moment a Range Rover driver hit him with their car has blasted Northants Police for "victim-blaming twaddle", sharing a letter from the police confirming they were not taking action because the victim placed himself "in front of the car" by dismounting his bike. The force's Chief Constable has now replied to the cyclist on social media to say the incident will be "reviewed and reassessed." 

The clip from Mat Burnham, shared on Twitter, starts with the driver of the Range Rover sounding the horn. 

He told road.cc: "I was cycling in reasonably busy traffic through what is a pretty crappy set of junctions for cyclists to navigate safely.

"The Range Rover driver overtook in a rather rapid fashion to reach a set of traffic lights at red. I filtered through to the front of the lights and took primary. I think she took umbrage at that and sounded her horn." 

Mat then dismounts his bike and appears to be shouting at the driver, before the car is driven into his bike. 

> Highway Code changes: video submissions made to police rise as cyclists urged to report law-breaking drivers

Sharing a letter from Northants Police after reporting the incident, Mat said it was "confirmed as an assault" but no action was taken "due to victim-blaming twaddle." 

Surprisingly the officer tells Mat that the driver has steered "to her right to try to avoid you", saying that he has "put himself in harm's way in front of the car". 

He continued: "To be honest I didn't expect much to come of reporting the collision as my previous experience of Northamptonshire Police has had them generating excuses on behalf of drivers rather than addressing poor behaviour.

"I thought they'd at least take it seriously, and warn the driver verbally or by letter even if they couldn't be bothered to prosecute. As it stands, she must still think deliberately driving into a cyclist is perfectly reasonable and rational behaviour."

He added: "I'm at my wits end. When will this nonsense end? Streets aren't safe for vulnerable road users and never will be without enforcement and basic decency." 

The reason for police deciding not to forward the incident for prosecution has been questioned by numerous people on social media, with many suggesting that the cyclist's actions in the clip could provide no possible justification for what occurred. 

road.cc has contacted Northants Police for comment. 

Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story). 

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
steaders1 | 2 years ago
3 likes

This may well get reviewed but I suspect the the old bill will sod so all again, which appears to be their general attitude with us cyclists

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to steaders1 | 2 years ago
5 likes

It will be interesting.  Unlike most CC's Nick Adderly has a VERY active social media presence.  This will be the first time I've seen it tested.

I expect some face saving action not quite at the level of punishment Matt and the average cyclist would prefer.....

Avatar
HoarseMann | 2 years ago
8 likes

It's not unreasonable to ask a driver why they beeped their horn if there's no obvious danger. They could have noticed something loose on the bike, like a quick release.

I also don't think you can say you are putting yourself in a dangerous position when the car is stationary. It's where you naturally would position yourself to talk with the driver, as you'd want to be close to the drivers window and in their line of sight.

Poor response from the police here and I hope Mat gets a better outcome on review.

Avatar
the little onion replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
7 likes
HoarseMann wrote:

It's not unreasonable to ask a driver why they beeped their horn if there's no obvious danger. They could have noticed something loose on the bike, like a quick release.

 

the audio isn't brilliant, but the cyclist does seem to be asking exactly that, whether something is dangerous or has fallen off. Totally in keeping with highway code

Avatar
Carior replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
7 likes
HoarseMann wrote:

It's not unreasonable to ask a driver why they beeped their horn if there's no obvious danger. They could have noticed something loose on the bike, like a quick release.

Have to disagree with this - for them to see that there was something loose on the bike would require them to be paying enough attention to see the bike... admitting that would be entirely incompatible with the invisible cyclist defence!!

Pages

Latest Comments