Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist fined for riding along motorway to 'visit his gran in hospital'

'You put your own life in danger here, that’s the thing we want you to take home'...

A cyclist who rode along the M60 while drunk because he wanted to 'visit his gran in hospital' has been fined.

Aaron Quinn, 28, said 'I ain't going to be doing this again at all' after he was sentenced for the 'really unusual offence'. 

Quinn was spotted by officers travelling down the slip road onto the motorway in February this year.

Other motorists reported him to the police, Manchester Magistrates Court heard. 

Manchester Evening News report that officers travelled towards junction 17 before pulling up in front of Quinn, of Warrington, on the hard shoulder.

He was said to be wearing all black and no lights were illuminated on his bike.

After pulling him over, officers breathalysed him and he was found to have 60 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath.

The drink drive limit is 35 micrograms per 100 millilitres of breath

Prosecuting, Stacey Morrow said police became aware of Quinn on the bike on February 25 of this year, when he was seen riding along the slip road.

She said: “Other road users reported the pedal cycle.

“He proceeded towards Junction 17 and when he arrived he saw the defendant on his pedal cycle along the hard shoulder of the motorway.

“He described him to be dressed all in black and said no lights were illuminated on the bike at all.

“The defendant stated he was riding along the motorway in order to get to Warrington because his gran had been admitted to hospital.

“He also admitted drinking two lagers, two ciders and a few other bits.

“He was cautioned and took part in a roadside breath test, and the lowest reading was 60 milligrams of alcohol.”

Mitigating, Suzanne Dooley said: “On the day in question, the defendant has received some terrible news in relation to his grandmother who was diagnosed with terminal cancer.

“He accepts he started drinking and the reason why he was on the motorway was he was making an attempt to cycle to see her.

“He accepts he was extremely upset and wasn’t thinking straight.”

Sentencing Quinn, Manchester JP Mrs Johnston said: “To be honest, this is a really unusual offence, I don’t think we’ve ever seen this before.

“You put your own life in danger here, that’s the thing we want you to take home.”

Speaking from the dock, he replied: “I ain’t gonna be doing this again at all.”

Quinn pleaded guilty to being drunk in charge of a pedal cycle, being excluded traffic on a special road and two offences of using a bicycle when the retro reflectors were not fitted.

He was fined £100, and ordered to pay £85 costs and £34 victim surcharge.

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
Steve K | 3 years ago
1 like

Seems strange to have a "victim's surcharge" when there is no victim (and yes, I know they are pooled rather than paid to the specific victim, but still).

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
1 like

I hadn't realised that there was an actual offence of "drunk in charge of a pedal cycle"... You learn something new every day.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
1 like

Yup - it's also an offence to be drunk in charge of a carriage, horse, or cattle, so no knocking back a few vodkas and joyriding the local dairy herd.

Avatar
brooksby replied to mdavidford | 3 years ago
4 likes

mdavidford wrote:

Yup - it's also an offence to be drunk in charge of a carriage, horse, or cattle, so no knocking back a few vodkas and joyriding the local dairy herd.

That's my weekend plans changed... surprise

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to mdavidford | 3 years ago
1 like

mdavidford wrote:

Yup - it's also an offence to be drunk in charge of a carriage, horse, or cattle, so no knocking back a few vodkas and joyriding the local dairy herd.

oooer missus!

Avatar
Hirsute replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
0 likes

We had a fraud officer who was ex police. His story from many years ago was that he arrested a bloke for being drunk on his bike and his sarge told him he had 20 seconds to get rid of the bike !! He chucked over some hedge and when the bloke sobered up next morning they denied all knowledge of the bike !

The paperwork then for that offence was a nightmare, hence the desire to get rid of the bike !

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
2 likes

Hmm - doesn't seem like a ringing endorsement of fitness to be a fraud officer.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to mdavidford | 3 years ago
0 likes

Well, this was years and years ago. Standards were a bit different - you probably got a thick ear if you didn't follow your sarge's instructions !

 

Avatar
EK Spinner replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
0 likes

as far as I understand it though, there is no requirement to take a breath test if you are not in charge of a motor vehicle, I would refuse to take a breath test if I was on a bike (particularly in Scotland where the limit is lower) It is then up to the fiscal (or CPS in England and wales) to prove you are drunk

 

Avatar
armb replied to EK Spinner | 3 years ago
0 likes

I suspect if you turn up in front of a magistrate and the police officer says "he seemed drunk to me, but he refused to take a breath test", they'll (rightly or wrongly) take that as adequate proof.

Avatar
EK Spinner replied to armb | 3 years ago
0 likes

possibly, but with the very low level for driving we have in scotland now, you would fail a breath test after 1pint, especially if you had just finished it, and some proof/corroboration is also required.

Avatar
ktache | 3 years ago
1 like

I believe the drink drive limit is 35 not 30 mg per 100ml.

From previous stories, the use of a breathiliser to quantify the drunkeness of a cyclist seems rare.  I guess the police thought this one is going to court and we want some numbers.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to ktache | 3 years ago
0 likes
ktache wrote:

I believe the drink drive limit is 35 not 30 mg per 100ml.

From previous stories, the use of a breathiliser to quantify the drunkeness of a cyclist seems rare.  I guess the police thought this one is going to court and we want some numbers.

You are out by a factor of 1000 (hence dead!):

In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the alcohol limit for drivers is 80 milligrammes of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood, 35 micrograms per 100 millilitres of breath, or 107 milligrammes per 100 millilitres of urine.

https://www.gov.uk/drink-drive-limit

Interesting that the gvt website has two alternative spellings for grams/grammes, depending on the prefix.

Avatar
ktache replied to Sriracha | 3 years ago
4 likes

I apologise and stand corrected.

I should of course used μ rather than m.

Avatar
jh2727 replied to Sriracha | 3 years ago
0 likes

Sriracha wrote:
ktache wrote:

I believe the drink drive limit is 35 not 30 mg per 100ml.

From previous stories, the use of a breathiliser to quantify the drunkeness of a cyclist seems rare.  I guess the police thought this one is going to court and we want some numbers.

You are out by a factor of 1000 (hence dead!): In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the alcohol limit for drivers is 80 milligrammes of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood, 35 micrograms per 100 millilitres of breath, or 107 milligrammes per 100 millilitres of urine. https://www.gov.uk/drink-drive-limit Interesting that the gvt website has two alternative spellings for grams/grammes, depending on the prefix.

 

So that puts him at nearly 2000 times over the limit?

FromTheArticle wrote:

After pulling him over, officers breathalysed him and he was found to have 60 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath.

The drink drive limit is 35 micrograms per 100 millilitres of breath

Avatar
sparrowlegs | 3 years ago
4 likes

In other words "alcoholic retard saved from almost certain death".

Dickhead. 

Avatar
FrankH replied to sparrowlegs | 3 years ago
1 like

sparrowlegs wrote:

In other words "alcoholic retard saved from almost certain death".

That's rather dramatic. The hard shoulder of a motorway IS a dangerous place but doesn't usually result in instant death. I've been there a few times and I'm here to tell the tales.

sparrowlegs wrote:

Dickhead.

That's true though.

Avatar
Steve K replied to sparrowlegs | 3 years ago
2 likes

Can you please not use the R word - it is extremely offensive.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Steve K | 3 years ago
1 like

Steve K wrote:

Can you please not use the R word - it is extremely offensive.

Yes, this seems to be a (quite unpleasant) Americanism, but in any case it comes from an actual medical term. It's equivalent (in my opinion granted, though I'm not alone in this view) to using words like cretin, mongol, spastic etc as perjoratives. It's not really very nice.

Latest Comments