Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclists to be banned from Oxford Street as part of Sadiq Khan’s pedestrianisation plans, but could be allowed to cycle at night

Mayor of London’s office has confirmed that it’s working to provide “alternative routes and enhanced provision” for cyclists, in a bid to transform the high street into a “beautiful public space”

Cyclists will not be allowed to access London’s Oxford Street as part of Sadiq Khan’s pedestrianisation plans, with the Mayor’s office confirming to road.cc that it’s working to provide “alternative routes and enhanced provision” for cyclists, with a potential for opening it to be used by cyclists at night.

In an announcement that even “blindsided” Westminster City Council — responsible for the central London high street — Mayor Sadiq Khan’s office said this morning that a 0.7 mile stretch between Oxford Circus and Marble Arch will become a traffic-free road, with the potential for further changes towards Tottenham Court Road.

The pedestrianisation initiative, aimed at creating a “beautiful public space”, comes as part of the mayor’s “urgent actions” to transform and revitalise the street that was affected by a shift to online shopping and the Covid-19 pandemic, so that it can “once again become the leading retail destination in the world.”

road.cc reached out to the Mayor of London’s office to ask whether cyclists will be allowed to be a part of this ‘beautiful public space’ and were told: “We will be working with the community and stakeholders to finalise specific plans, but the concept for Oxford Street is as a pedestrianised area.

“We will be working to provide alternative routes for cyclists, enhanced cycling provision and potential cyclist access at night.”

It’s not clear how cyclists will be barred entry from the high street, and if cyclists found riding on the road will penalised or not, but more details about the plan are expected to emerge later.

> Proposed Oxford Street cycling ban a “disaster for cycling in London,” says Andrew Gilligan

The pedestrianisation plans formed part of Khan’s election manifesto in the 2016 London mayoral elections. He previously tried to implement major changes to Oxford Street, but was blocked from implementing his plans primarily by Westminster City Council, led by Tories at the time.

This time, his plan has been backed by the new UK Government, aimed at delivering a “much-improved experience for shoppers, residents, workers and tourists visiting Oxford Street and the surrounding area” and compete with other international high street destinations, such as Times Square in New York, the Champs-Elysees in Paris and Las Ramblas in Barcelona.

The Mayor said: “Oxford Street was once the jewel in the crown of Britain’s retail sector, but there’s no doubt that it has suffered hugely over the last decade. Urgent action is needed to give the nation’s most famous high street a new lease of life.

“I am excited to be working with the new Government, and local retailers and businesses, on these plans - that will help to restore this famous part of the capital to its former glory, while creating new jobs and economic prosperity for the capital and the country.

“I want Oxford Street to once again become the leading retail destination in the world. The transformation of Oxford Street will be a leading example of how working together – City Hall and the new Government – we can build a better London for everyone.”

Oxford Street pedestrianisation (via TfL).jpg

 

Angela Rayner, Deputy Prime Minister said that the plan to revitalise Oxford Street will “drive growth by creating new jobs, generating economic activity, and giving a much-needed boost to London’s night-time economy.”

However, Westminster City Council, now led by Labour, said that they weren’t made aware of this announcement and only found out about the details less than a week ago. However, it said that it would “work constructively” with the mayor.

Stuart Love, Chief Executive of Westminster City Council said: “Westminster City Council has spent the last two years working closely with businesses and resident groups to develop detailed proposals to redesign and improve Oxford Street.

“These plans are shovel ready, have had the support of retailers and the local community and were intended to deliver significant economic growth whilst also securing a successful future for our thriving neighbourhoods in the West End.

“It will be important to receive further details about what is planned, including how long it could take to be delivered and how the concerns of local residents and users of the street will be addressed.

“We will want to know how they will benefit from any proposals, particularly given the practical challenges pedestrianisation may have for the wider area. As a custodian of the West End, our role will be to ensure that local voices are heard loud and clear.”

> Banning cyclists and pedestrians from Britain's "most expensive street" slammed "a selfish and spiteful act" by Labour candidate standing for election in the area

In 2017, London’s cycling and walking commissioner Will Norman had conceded that cyclists could be banned from Oxford Street once it gets pedestrianised, saying: “In Oxford Street in the morning peak there are about 200 cyclists per hour. In Wigmore Street, slightly to the north, there are about the same number per hour, and again on New Cavendish Street and George Street.

“As a combination, they begin to add up, so it’s very important we do look at the cycling facilities in that area as part of that scheme. Whether they go down Oxford Street or alternative routes, that is why we do need to do a consultation and understand what the needs are of local residents and other stakeholders.”

In the same year, Andrew Gilligan, London’s former cycling commissioner under Boris Johnson, claimed that banning cyclists from Oxford Street represented “an unqualified disaster for cycling in London.”

He warned that the lack of suitable parallel routes for safe infrastructure for bike riders means an Oxford Street cycling ban would be ignored by many, and that the road will become “London’s biggest unofficial example of the notorious failure that is shared space.”

“That won’t be good for pedestrians, or for the image of cycling. There will be near-misses or worse, arrests, fines, stories in the Daily Mail,” he wrote in a Guardian blog. “For the avoidance of doubt, I do not approve of anyone disobeying the rules. But it’s what happens when you make proposals for a road that totally ignore one of its main user groups.”

Previously, Kensington Palace Gardens, a half-mile-long tree-lined avenue dubbed Britian’s most expensive street and ‘Billionaires Row’ thanks to its £35 million average house price, had come under fire for its decision to ban cyclists along with pedestrians back in June.

The move was slammed as “a selfish and spiteful act” by Joe Powell, the Labour parliamentary candidate in Kensington & Bayswayer, who even launched a petition calling for the “crucial, safe connection between Notting Hill Gate and Kensington High Street” used by thousands of pedestrians and cyclists every day to be reopened.

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

46 comments

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Clem Fandango | 2 months ago
3 likes

Beat me to it. A friend of the nigels, this'n.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to perce | 2 months ago
4 likes

perce wrote:

Oh I don't know. What about Ricardo Montalban?

He was a superb actor. Much better than the white-washed version of Kahn played by Benadryl Cumbersnatch.

Also, his name was Ricardo Montalbán

Avatar
perce replied to hawkinspeter | 2 months ago
6 likes

Yes. Yes he was. I liked him in Columbo. I forgot about Cumberbatch - he was the worst Kahn.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to perce | 2 months ago
2 likes

perce wrote:

Yes. Yes he was. I liked him in Columbo. I forgot about Cumberbatch - he was the worst Kahn.

He ws also part Merino - his full name being Ricardo Gonzalo Pedro Montalbán y Merino (Merino being his mother's name). I also enjoyed his Planet of the Apes roles.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to perce | 2 months ago
3 likes

I was told Genghis was pretty bad. Or is that just fake news spread by Russia?

Avatar
open_roads replied to alexuk | 2 months ago
0 likes

How else do you describe a man who promised to build more houses than his predecessor and then failed to do so.

And a man who used bogus statistics to justify raising £1B (and counting) from motorists for a clean air zone that the latest data shows a statistically insignificant effect on air quality?**

And that's before we go to the very long list of projects that are late / over budget.
 

** caveat - anything that encourages people to use their cars less is a good thing - but the point here is about integrity.

 

Avatar
Clem Fandango replied to open_roads | 2 months ago
2 likes

All explained in this handy Venn diagram

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Clem Fandango | 2 months ago
2 likes

Aktchually...

I think you'll find that's a Euler diagram.

Avatar
Clem Fandango replied to mdavidford | 2 months ago
2 likes

That'll be bloody Khan's fault too

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to mdavidford | 2 months ago
1 like

mdavidford wrote:

Aktchually...

I think you'll find that's a Euler diagram.

To be fair though, there's a whole bunch of stuff named after Euler, so let's give John Venn a bit of credit.

Avatar
quiff replied to open_roads | 2 months ago
2 likes

Sorry, confused - this is Ghengis, right?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to open_roads | 2 months ago
1 like

open_roads wrote:

How else do you describe a man who promised to build more houses than his predecessor and then failed to do so.

Khan's average number of new houses per year over the eight years he has been mayor has been 36,000. For the eight years of Johnson's mayoralty, the average was 26,000. Now I'm no mathematician but that would appear to me rather a significant achievement, particularly when you consider that for two years of Khan's tenure the pandemic intervened.

 

Avatar
mattsccm replied to Rendel Harris | 2 months ago
0 likes

Seems a good idea.. After all, as cyclists we like to be protected from more dangerous road users. 

Surely cyclists needing to transit the street as a direct way through can get off an push? It may take time but they can start earlier surely.

Yes it may hinder the progress of a very small minority but that's life. Some loses out. We cannot cater for all. 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to mattsccm | 2 months ago
1 like

mattsccm wrote:

Seems a good idea.. After all, as cyclists we like to be protected from more dangerous road users. 

Surely cyclists needing to transit the street as a direct way through can get off an push? It may take time but they can start earlier surely.

Yes it may hinder the progress of a very small minority but that's life. Some loses out. We cannot cater for all. 

Well it's not a small minority, Oxford Street is a major conduit for commuting cyclists coming from West London going over towards the City, it's pretty well used every time I go through there at rush-hour. Yes, cyclists could get off and push but it is 2 km from Marble Arch to Tottenham Court Road so that doesn't really work in any practical sense and in any case, why should that be a solution imposed on cyclists? I don't see many people closing major thoroughfares to cars and saying the car drivers can walk the last 2 km, do you? Once motorised vehicular traffic has been taken out of the equation there will be a 25 metre-wide corridor (see picture). Is it really asking too much for 3 m of that to be dedicated to a cycle lane, clearly marked and with proper kerb segregation to prevent cyclists straying into the pedestrians, who will have the other 22 m to themselves? It could be a fantastic feature and encourage many more visitors and shoppers to the street. You only have to look at the many examples in Paris to see how pedestrianisation and cycle lanes can work in harmony to the benefit of all once the motor traffic has been removed.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Rendel Harris | 2 months ago
2 likes

Yes to the above, but can we do better than 3 metres please for a bi-direction path, (at least 4, ideally 5) - if there are enough cyclists that it's worth preseving cycling there at all (and no good alternatives)?

After all this is a rich shop window into a capital city - I know we're mostly a sick joke in the world of cycling transport but why should we give everyone another round of "superhypeways"-style mirth?

("Because UK" I guess we could even make a buffer in the middle to provide comfort to pedestrians - though that's non-standard and people manage to cross such cycle paths every day in NL - and indeed wider streets and roads all over the UK...)

Of course it's not just the pedestrians I'm sure; I bet plenty of the shops are eyeing the space outside e.g. for stalls, seating for food and drink places etc.

Avatar
matthewn5 replied to alexuk | 2 months ago
1 like

I love Sadiq Khan especially because he winds up racists so much 😂

Pages

Latest Comments