The number of cyclists on many A-roads has surpassed the number of drivers at 43 locations, according to an analysis of Department for Transport figures from 2020.
In a report published in the Sunday Times it was noted that the government figures point to eight main roads where cyclists now outnumber all other vehicles, while at a further 35 locations they outnumbered cars and taxis on an average day.
The Department for Transport's road traffic statistics map allows users to compare traffic count figures by mode of transport from previous years.
Central London saw the greatest proportion of road users on two wheels, with 87 per cent of traffic on a section of Lambeth Road coming from cyclists.
On Royal Mint Street in the City, 81 per cent of traffic was pedalling a bicycle — four other locations recorded between 55 per cent and 63 per cent.
Commenting on the news, Cycling UK's head of campaigns, Duncan Dollimore said: "London shows that when you start to build a network, and not just individual schemes, you see increased levels of cycling across the whole network or town or city.
"We are seeing similar increases in pockets across the rest of the country where there is a commitment to separated space. People will cycle if the conditions feel safer."
In September, the most recent DfT statistics showed that lockdown had seen the cycling gender gap narrow, and that the average number of miles cycled per person was on the rise.
> Lockdown sees cycling gender gap narrow, government statistics reveal
The Walking and Cycling Statistics, England: 2020 report showed that people in England on average made 20 cycling trips, a 26 per cent increase on 2019.
Average number of miles cycled was also on the rise, up from 54 miles per person in 2019 to 88 miles per person last year, an increase of 62 per cent.
The gap between the number of trips made by men and women narrowed from three times as many made by men in 2019 to two times as many in 2020.
Last week, Transport for London announced that the capital's Santander Cycles scheme smashed its record for hires made in a year, with over 10.9 million made in 2021.
More than one million individual customers used the scheme, and 178,000 new members joined — a seven per cent increase on 2020.
"It’s fantastic to see our cycle hire scheme reach such incredible heights," Mayor of London Sadiq Khan said. "Not only have we seen a huge rise in cycling since the pandemic, but participation has also broadened, particularly among people from minority ethnic communities.
"In order to keep up this success, we need safe roads for cyclists, and we continue to work with boroughs to roll out cycle lanes, extra pavement space and safer junctions. I urge anyone who has been thinking of taking up cycling to give it a go and get riding [in 2022]."
Add new comment
14 comments
I think the underlying data has come from here - https://roadtraffic.dft.gov.uk/downloads
You can also view individual count points on a map here - https://roadtraffic.dft.gov.uk/#9/52.6814/-1.5120/basemap-localauthoriti...
Well this is clearly the apocalypse the Fair Fuel UK folks tried to warn us about. The hard-working motorist has been priced off the A roads (all 8 of them) and the space has been unfairly allocated to cyclists (at a few points, in two congested cities). Might as well call "motorways" "cycleways" and be done with it!
So although pleased to see this it seems as much about excitable journalism. I'm very cautiously optimistic that cycling might get a change at a mild revival in the UK. That's certainly not by virtue of political support which amounts to "palliative care" at best. I think this is via changes e.g. WFH, some social awareness that cycling is *fun* and can be convenient for some trips etc.
As an interesting exercise - what changes would persuade you that cycling - as a transport option for all - was actually starting to return in your area?
I think segregated joined-up long-distance cycleways would be a great idea
Nice to see although the two mentioned, one is from a closed road only accessible by cyclists and buses one way and cyclists the other, (I'm guessing the "bit of Lambeth Road is this bit) and the Royal Mint Street is a narrow back road which is one way for motor traffic and a two way CS3 leading to / from Tower Hill section.
So very swayed to cyclist paths only really anyway. Still steps and all that.
I can't see the article as it's behind a paywall but the location that you link to is Lambeth Road (rather Wandsworth Road) and you are correct that from one direction it is cycle and bus entry only - it's where out-of-service buses park. It is, however, open to cars from the Imperial War Museum end as there is business and residential parking. It's technically the end of an a-road and cyclists easily outnumber all forms of traffic on it but, like you say, as it be can't used as a through-route, it would be a bit odd for an article to cheer loudly about it.
It is mentioned in the Road.cc text. (Don't know where my head was when I said Wandsworth, now edited)
Yeah I saw that. I was agreeing with you. What I wasn't sure about was if the article mentions the exact stretch of Lambeth Road.
I do wish theyd actually cite the source for these stats as theres nothing on the DfT that remotely resembles these findings, the article references average daily figures, but they dont measure cycling directly for transport stats, they estimate it and correlate it against active travel surveys, where cycling equates to as little as sitting on a peloton bike for a few minutes.
However whats more interesting in the article is apparently the government are due to announce the next part of funding for LTNs, cycle lanes outside of London along with a national cycling and walking commissioner for England, to oversee a new inspectorate, Active Travel England, who will be responsible for making sure they are properly built.
No chance of that happening in the foreseeable future on rural A roads. They tend to be winding, narrow and fast, and too hazardous for cyclists.
So shouldn't the headline be
Cyclists now outnumber drivers on many A-roads in London, Department for Transport figures reveal
Two are in Oxford.
Then I stand corrected, sir.
I didn't read the Times story, and the road.cc precis only mentioned two in London (and MSM tends to think that London is England...).
This bit's all very confused as well:
Why are we comparing cyclists on 'many A-roads' with drivers at 43 specific locations? And are all those locations A-roads?
And actually it then turns out that cyclists didn't outnumber 'drivers' at the large majority of those locations - they only outnumbered cars and taxis.
Build it and they will come. I'm sure the msm will begin ignoring this immediately.
Maybe it's time for proper investment, not just the crumbs off the road building table.