A driver — enraged by a teenager accidentally clipping her wing mirror pursued a 16-year-old cyclist and smashed her vehicle into the boy's bike, knocking him to the ground with facial injuries — has walked away from court with a suspended sentence.
Phoebe Groves pleaded guilty to assault occasioning actual bodily harm and dangerous driving, and was told by the judge at Teesside Crown Court that it is "highly unusual" for a driver to avoid immediate jail time in such circumstances, but was handed a 12-month sentence suspended for two years and a 12-month driving ban, as well as 150 hours of unpaid work and 40 rehabilitation activity requirement days.
The Northern Echo reports judge Timothy Stead was shown CCTV footage of Groves, 22, ramming her Vauxhall Astra into the 16-year-old as he pulled up outside his house on Fabian Road, Middlesbrough, at just after 8pm on 7 August 2021.
The impact threw the teenager into the air before he landed on the footpath, suffering grazing to his face and swelling around both eyes, and came after Groves had pursued the cyclist, angered by a friend of his who had accidentally clipped her vehicle's wing mirror moments earlier.
At sentencing, prosecutor Jon Harley told the judge the boy had suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of Groves' assault, while in her victim impact statement the boy's mother said he "is not the same person anymore" and never leaves the house and barely takes care of himself.
Describing the attack, Mr Harley said the boy "was hit from behind by the vehicle driven by the defendant. He was thrown from his bike and he hit the pavement before the car drove off."
In mitigation, Rod Hunt suggested his client was "not at the time, in her right mind" and argued Groves had suffered a "brainstorm" when she became enraged by the contact with her wing mirror. He also stressed that Groves had returned to the scene after initially driving off.
"You have heard me say that people who come before this court for using a vehicle as a weapon deliberately and cause injury, almost always will go immediately to prison," judge Stead told her.
"I know that you know that what you did was very wrong, I believe that you are deeply sorry for it.
"Your case is exceptional.
"If you do breach the order within the next two years, and I don't believe that you will, then the court will start with the suspended sentence and then will include anything else."
Add new comment
42 comments
Apologies, was going from the post rather than the story.
Indeed, she probably didn't set out to kill but her actions certainly could have and the actions were premediatated. In other news, could you get off a charge therefore by suggesting that shooting someone in the head was not an attempt to kill, just an attempt to shoot someone in the head?
So, if she had pursued the boys, and instead of ramming them with her car, got out and smacked them with a baseball bat, what would the sentence be in that case? I think we know that it woudl be much more severe. Once again, the police and CPS can't see that a vehicle is a potential weapon.
"You have heard me say that people who come before this court for using a vehicle as a weapon deliberately and cause injury, almost always will go immediately to prison," judge Stead told her.
"I know that you know that what you did was very wrong, I believe that you are deeply sorry for it.
"Your case is exceptional."
Judge did acknowledge the dangerous, driver "delibrately" used her vehicle as a "weapon", but, as usual, scandalously, made excuses for her not to prison her.
The dangerous driver's defence claimed she suffered "brainstorm," - that's a new excuse - when actually it was ROAD RAGE, & certainly with intent.
You wonder why she wasn't charged with attempted murder☢
Seems in this case, the police and CPS did do their job and charge accordingly
So it's only the judge not seeing this a a serious assault with a deadly weapon
Compare and contrast with angry disabled pedestrian - manslaughter when not even clear there was intent . . .
Maybe also contrast elderly lady cyclist and 'kids' . . .
Angered by someone touching her car, she decided to ram her vehicle into a different child.
All the levels of wrong on this story are utterly astounding
I missed that on the first reading. She assaulted a completely different child 'Collective responsibility', innit...?
'Collective responsibility', innit...?
Along the lines of: I heard about cyclists going through red traffic lights, so I can too- linked to 'whataboutery'
https://upride.cc/incident/t90jdt_audiwithcaravan_rljatspeed/
"You people."
It might even be slightly worse! In the Northern Echo report, it would seem that the original collision between the victim's friend and the door mirror of Ms Groves' car was as a result of her braking sharply in front of them, a brake check as it would otherwise be known.
I had the same thought. Was this followed up by the prosecution I wonder? If she had engineered/been the cause of the mirror collision in the first place it gives the lie to her claim of a 'brainstorm' brought on by her mirror being clipped. (Not that that is any kind of mitigation.)
Driver who attempted murder avoids jail, meanwhile it's big news that a train has crashed in Greece resulting in over 35 deaths (thoughts with the families and friends involved). Yet there's no rolling news ticker on the number of deaths caused by drivers. According to wikipedia over 600 motor vehicle related deaths in Greece in 2019, my thoughts go out to them too. No three days of national mourning for them either I expect.
Sometimes the Matrix related red pill blue pill meme/comparison they make on the f#*kcars subreddit feels rather apt, I just wish it wasn't also associated with Qanon conspiracy theorists!
Pages