Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist suffers shocking injuries as hooded gang steals £12,500 Specialized and beats victim

The rider was using a cycle lane when he was pushed off and repeatedly kicked, losing teeth and suffering a broken jaw, collarbone and scapula

An east London cyclist needed multiple surgeries for injuries sustained in a violent bikejacking in Waltham Forest two weeks ago.

Releasing more information in the hope of tracking down the perpetrators, the Metropolitan Police said the incident occurred on Tuesday 23 May at around 19:45 and saw a man in his 40s, aboard a £12,500 Specialized S-Works Tarmac with Roval wheels, pushed from his bike by a group of hooded males who had gathered next to Lea Bridge Road's cycle lane.

The attack happened between the Lea Valley Ice Centre and Lea Valley Riding Centre, just a couple miles north of Lee Valley VeloPark across Hackney Marshes.

Described as "a group of males wearing similar black hoodies" and also on bicycles, the victim was pushed off, one of the men then riding the stolen bike away over the marshes while other members of the group "repeatedly kicked" the victim, breaking his jaw in two places and knocking out teeth. The victim also suffered a broken collarbone and scapula.

"This incident has left the victim with possible nerve damage and has resulted in him needing a number of surgeries," detective constable Helen Cordes said. "It is imperative we track down those responsible.

"This area is routinely used by commuters and I would ask any cyclists in the area at the time to share any helmet or body cams footage that may have captured this incident or suspects. I would also ask anyone in the trade to be on the lookout for this bike and anyone attempting to sell such a high-spec bike."

Anyone who witnessed this incident or has information should call police on 101 or tweet @MetCC quoting reference CAD 7178/23MAY. To remain 100 per cent anonymous please call the independent charity Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Reports of similar bikejacking incidents in and around London have become worryingly common in recent times, last month a machete-wielding teenager who knocked pro cyclist Alexandar Richardson off his bike in Richmond Park in October 2021, dragging the then-Alpecin-Fenix rider for 100m before taking his team-issue bike, was sentenced to 12 months.

> What can be done about the latest spate of bikejackings?

Elsewhere, across almost all parts of London and its outskirts, road.cc has reported on similar incidents in the past two years, pro cyclist Jennifer George saying she has been twice targeted while training out of south-east London to Surrey and explaining that she no longer rides alone for fear of a third attempt.

In response to the growing picture of moped-riding criminals targeting cyclists for expensive bicycles, British Cycling last July said it was "deeply concerned"

"The sad reality however is that when these spikes in violent crime occur, and while we try to understand the pattern of incidents better, it is prudent for individuals, clubs and groups to discuss these concerns together and think carefully about the rides they have planned," policy manager Nick Chamberlain continued.

> "They said give us the bike or we stab you": Another cyclist targeted by motorbike-riding muggers on popular route out of London

In March, a Bermondsey cyclist was left bleeding "profusely" after being struck on the nose during yet another bikejacking incident on a popular route that has seen previous similar attacks, so much so that graffiti warning cyclists of attacks was sprayed on the entrance to one section.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.

Add new comment

47 comments

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
4 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Meanwhile I want to see a Road.cc test of these wheels - I bet they'd be squeakier than my disc brakes

 

The mechanic who fitted the rear mudguard had clearly seen the front mudguard fitter being put up against a wall and shot!

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
3 likes

If you're feeling nostalgic Pashley still make a version of the Parabike.  Theirs doesn't have the nifty folding frame of the BSA Airbourne Bicycle though, nor the chainring spider manufacturer's signature!

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
2 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

NOtotheEU wrote:

Not designed to be fired from the bike but could be in an emergency. If your assailant has less than 100mm of armour this will be perfect.

Heretic! That's not a bicycle!

Anyhow, I appear to have fallen down a military bicycle squirrel-hole and have found this interesting site: https://onlinebicyclemuseum.co.uk/wwi-military-bicycle-hire-ww1/

They did a book called "Bad Teeth No Bar" which is now out of print but I found a cheap copy on eBay and just bought it.

Now that's a weapon you can rely on, as the .303 Lee Enfield that came into use with the British Army in 1880s and was only finally replaced as a sniper weapon around 1990 or so. I'm not sure on the reaction you'd get cycling around with it though. I expect you'd get a posse of armed response officers jumping on you rather quickly here in the UK. In Texas though the police would probably give you a cheery wave as you pedalled past.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to OldRidgeback | 1 year ago
0 likes

Of course .303 rounds would likely cause some issues to anyone living in houses around the thieves.  Or indeed several hundred metres distant.

It would certainly allow you to fix issues with motor vehicles though.

Interesting customs in different countries and how the law slices and dices.  Here's an example of what most people would recognise as a serious bit of kit but is apparently legally no different to a snuff box at the antiques sales in the US.  Just don't use shells that go bang when they hit.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
1 like

chrisonatrike wrote:

Of course .303 rounds would likely cause some issues to anyone living in houses around the thieves.  Or indeed several hundred metres distant.

It would certainly allow you to fix issues with motor vehicles though.

Interesting customs in different countries and how the law slices and dices.  Here's an example of what most people would recognise as a serious bit of kit but is apparently legally no different to a snuff box at the antiques sales in the US.  Just don't use shells that go bang when they hit.

That's a useful point you make about '303 rounds. They do go quite far. Using .45 pistol rounds would probably be better. There was a rifle made using the action of the .303, the folding stock from either a Sten gun or the wooden stock from a Thompson, plus the silenced barrel from a Thomspon. It was used by special forces. It was quiet and wouldn't have so much recoil, plus the rounds wouldn't go so far either. I think it's even more compact than an LE, so you could bolt it to your toptube. 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to OldRidgeback | 1 year ago
1 like

OldRidgeback wrote:

There was a rifle made using the action of the .303, the folding stock from either a Sten gun or the wooden stock from a Thompson, plus the silenced barrel from a Thomspon. It was used by special forces. It was quiet and wouldn't have so much recoil, plus the rounds wouldn't go so far either. I think it's even more compact than an LE, so you could bolt it to your toptube. 

Indeed and good point about not deafening everyone.  If it's the one I'm thinking of you may still be able to get a reproduction version from the US.

I thought you were going with this shotgun for bandit defence.  Lots of short ranged firepower but a bit bulky on a bike.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
1 like

chrisonatrike wrote:

OldRidgeback wrote:

There was a rifle made using the action of the .303, the folding stock from either a Sten gun or the wooden stock from a Thompson, plus the silenced barrel from a Thomspon. It was used by special forces. It was quiet and wouldn't have so much recoil, plus the rounds wouldn't go so far either. I think it's even more compact than an LE, so you could bolt it to your toptube. 

Indeed and good point about not deafening everyone.  If it's the one I'm thinking of you may still be able to get a reproduction version from the US.

I thought you were going with this shotgun for bandit defence.  Lots of short ranged firepower but a bit bulky on a bike.

It is indeed the one you were thinking of. There's an original in the Imperial War Musuem which is where I first found out about it.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to NOtotheEU | 1 year ago
3 likes

Recoilless I assume?  That would be sensible, albeit sad for anyone behind you.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
2 likes

There are almost certainly other examples but surely a suitable weapon to pair with a bike would be the Fusil Mitrailleur Modele 1915 CSRG or Chauchat?  Given it was mostly made in the Gladiator factory, formerly producing bikes, motorbikes and cars?

On the other hand the reliability was never exceptional and the vibration from the long recoil might count against it.  However the Belgians made a better version post-war.  In fact Belgians cycle troops acquitted themselves well at the beginning of WWI and WWII.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
2 likes

The Chauchat was notorious for jamming. The French Army disliked it so much they replaced it quickly in WWI and then offloaded the weapons to the US Army when they entered the war in 1917. The Americans then found out very quickly why the French had been so willing to sell them the Chauchats.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to OldRidgeback | 1 year ago
0 likes

(Another rabbit hole) Word is that the French model wasn't a wonderful weapon and especially not for the battlefields  but the story is complicated.  It was pretty cheap, it could be made in non-firearms factories and it was there when needed - in vast quantities.  Unless you lump all "Maxim-style machineguns" together the most numerous automatic weapon of WWI was - the Chauchat.

Apparently the US troops were particularly unhappy as some had trained on Lewis guns, Browning Automatic Rifles or Browning heavy machine guns - all much better weapons.  However due to supply issues but also so as not to "spoil the surprise" (keeping the new "superweapons" for the 1919 big push) they were then given French weapons.  The US version of the Chauchat had fewer holes in the magazine but they were flimsy.  Much worse some vital dimensions were wrong - there were some issues with sights for both types.

But - unless you're a Belgian cycle trooper - it doesn't seem to be an ideal bicycle gun anyway!

Avatar
Spangly Shiny replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
5 likes

It's called a Negligent Discharge by the way. There are no accidental discharges.

Avatar
Car Delenda Est replied to Spangly Shiny | 1 year ago
5 likes

In this case yes but sometimes, particularly on older guns, a mechanical malfunction can occur.
Iirc underpowered ammunition in early open-bolt submachine guns can cause the bolt to cycle back far enough to chamber and fire the next round but not far enough to catch on the sear.

Also this is officially my favourite road.cc thread

Avatar
StillTrying replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
1 like

chrisonatrike wrote:

Overkill and - at around 240kg - might unbalance your bike.  The recoil will also affect the handling.

30-06 rounds will do the job perfectly well.  The following design actually existed.  You could probably disguise this as a front basket.  The tandem model might be better though as your stoker can help feed the ammunition belt.

Looking at where the grip and trigger are it might increase the risk of an accidental discharge during a hard stop though.

I sprayed my coffee everywhere when I read this. Genius.

Avatar
Fignon's ghost replied to brooksby | 1 year ago
2 likes

Any police sting will be seen by spotters. This needs to be an infiltration exercise. Perhaps the rozzers are waiting for an innocent to die before launching special ops.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Fignon's ghost | 1 year ago
4 likes

Fignon's ghost wrote:

Any police sting will be seen by spotters. This needs to be an infiltration exercise. Perhaps the rozzers are waiting for an innocent to die before launching special ops.

They need to employ some young gamers/drone pilots and have some drones for capturing evidence along the crime hotspots. Who's going to suspect some young adults playing with drones?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

They need to employ some young gamers/drone pilots and have some drones for capturing evidence along the crime hotspots. Who's going to suspect some young adults playing with drones?

Might be a good "swords into ploughshares" project if the Russo-Ukranian war ever comes to an end before the world runs out of Ukranians.  Nation of skilled drone builders and operators there.  They could even work remotely if UK folks are worried about immigration...

Pages

Latest Comments