Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

"Those who don't see themselves may feel cycling is not for them": Images of cyclists lack diversity and focus on cycling as leisure rather than transport, researchers suggest

Analysis commissioned by climate charity suggests images of cyclists not representative, as group argues: "We simply cannot afford to exclude many people from choosing cycling as an alternative form of transport"...

Images of cyclists online lack diversity and may potentially contribute to "excluding many people from choosing cycling as an alternative form of transport", a charity has argued.

The analysis, commissioned by climate charity Possible and first reported by Forbes transport journalist Carlton Reid, saw the University of Westminster's Active Travel Academy in London look at 100 photos of "family cycling" from Google Images.

In general, it was found that images displayed "implicitly heterosexual-type nuclear families" and "there was a lack of diversity of representation in terms of disability, body size, and ethnicity", with the majority showing white, slim, non-disabled people riding in the countryside, away from urban areas.

Possible argues the lack of diversity could impact "those who don't see themselves" from thinking that cycling is for them, potentially "excluding many people from choosing cycling as an alternative form of transport".

"Those who don't see themselves in those images or who live in built-up areas may feel as if cycling is not for them because they are not also white, slim, or able-bodied and do not have widespread access to green spaces and calmer roads on which to cycle," Possible suggested.

The research concludes: "While inevitably limited (and only representing one facet of under-representation), the results are important and should raise concern about the narrowness of some of this representation. Specifically, there is a need for authorities and other organisations to widen the range of images that they use to show 'family cycling', which may well include generating and sharing their own images."

It was also suggested that Active Travel England "could take responsibility for sourcing and sharing a wider variety of such images, including those featuring people with larger bodies, different family structures, and more ethnic minority people cycling in locations that are clearly within the UK".

Last year, the Bicycle Association published the insights of its research into diversity in the cycling industry, releasing a report which said the senior leaders are "overwhelmingly white, heterosexual men", as well as noting "widespread experience of unfair treatment, including harassment".

> "The male, white, cycling enthusiast niche has reached its natural limit": Cycling must address lack of diversity, says Bicycle Association

That followed the Association, several months earlier urging the bike industry to change if it wants to grow and reach new customers.

The report found that women hold just eight per cent of cycle workshop roles, 19 per cent of customer-facing roles, and 40 per cent of the industry's administrative roles – though only a small handful of those have progressed to senior leadership positions.

Over 90 per cent of women face barriers to both entering and progressing within the sports industry, citing issues as discrimination, harassment, a lack of role models, difficulty finding a work-life balance, and a lack of training and targeted recruitment among the key "blockers" to progress.

Though no official data for the cycling industry exists at the moment, the report also noted that, anecdotally, Black, Asian, or people from ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the sector, as are individuals from low socio-economic backgrounds or with disabilities. There is also a lack of LGBTQ+ people joining or leading the UK bike industry, the report said.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
chrisonabike | 2 hours ago
1 like

Not quite sure what the news is here?

  • The demographic mix of UK cyclists doesn't reflect UK society.  Reasons will be complex and may vary for different kinds of cyclists / cycling (e.g. I'd bet there's a positive skew away from "UK origin" in the ethnicity of folks working for the food delivery companies).  There may be less skew in "mass cycling" places e.g. NL rather than the UK.   That might give us a clue as to a good way to address things (not just changing pictures).  There although "locals" cycle more than "immigrants" the latter certainly cycle.  Oh, and uniquely more trips are made by women than men!
  • There is bias in images of cyclists - also not news.
  • There is bias in images of stuff in the world.  Really not news.

Do the images reflect the realities of who's cycling?  And if not why not?

Being a vanilla dude "I don't know what I don't know" but I can't help feeling there are a couple of more fundamental barriers to cycling... "being able to visualise it" is important, but question:

Just how much would changing the pictures (even if it was to reflect reality better - see the first question) really make a difference to numbers cycling in the UK?

People in the UK give all kinds of reasons why they don't cycle.  Skepticism needed - asking about things people previously haven't considered may get you speculation and confabulation... However the top reason given is likely close to the reality: all kinds of people just don't cycle because it's not "safe" (pleasant) or convenient.  Then: people don't cycle because very few others (of any gender, age or ethnicity) cycle.  Cycling for transport in particular is not perceived as a social activity (and in the UK this is partly by design).  Finally many people have a car, right there, so the question doesn't really arise for many...

Avatar
Sriracha replied to chrisonabike | 1 hour ago
0 likes

Indeed, if they are looking to combat barriers to cycling I think there are far bigger ones than the images thrown up by Google. But I suspect they are grinding a different axe.

Avatar
kingleo | 2 hours ago
0 likes

82% of the people living in the UK are white, so most of the people who cycle will be white.

Avatar
JLasTSR | 3 hours ago
1 like

Isn't this more a question of Google or any other search engines algorithm not selecting images that reflect.the diversity of people cycling rather than there being a massively heavy preponderance of skinny white heterosexual families that cycle.

Avatar
quiff | 3 hours ago
1 like

I haven't read the research in detail (obvs) but "family cycling" is a pretty blunt search. It's not surprising that it returns e.g. lots of images of rural cycling away from traffic - because most of the images appear on leisure and tourism sites. If you were Visit Hampshire, would you use an image of the urban commute through Southampton, or a leisure ride in the New Forest? (There may be a geographical flaw in this argument, but you get the point)

EDIT: I have now read it, it's here. I accept the general premise that cycling images are relatively undiverse; that people who don't see themselves in images of cycling may be in some way dissuaded; and therefore that it is desirable actively to increase diversity in images of cycling. But a search for "family cycling" does not, I would suggest, provide a representative sample of cycling images people might be exposed to. If, for example, you were trying to find about about local cycle routes, you're unlikely to come across and be dissuaded by these images because you wouldn't search for "family cycling" because it's untargeted.             

Avatar
Sriracha replied to quiff | 4 hours ago
3 likes

Funnily enough, almost all car ads on TV show the car cruising down an empty boulevard or some unspoilt rural idyll, well away from any traffic! Somehow it does not seem to put off people who buy them for use in nose-to-tail traffic.

Avatar
Sriracha | 5 hours ago
1 like

They searched for "family" cycling. Is the cause of their upset that they then found representations of kids having both parents in their lives, out together cycling, as a family? And, moreover, enjoying the health benefits. What were they hoping to find?

Avatar
dh700 replied to Sriracha | 5 hours ago
0 likes

The referenced example was poorly chosen, but that doesn't change the point. Just perform a google images search for "cyclist". The enormous majority of results are skinny white males, with a few skinny white females thrown in. I scrolled many pages through those results, and other than a couple instances of Biniam Girmay and, oddly, a bunch of Daniela Larreal Chirinos, just about every person was skinny and white -- and those two professional bikeracers are skinny as well.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to dh700 | 4 hours ago
1 like

I've just done a Google of "family cycling" images - results below. Of the top eight images four are all white, one is in silhouette, two are non white and one is a mix of races. So I'm not sure their racial claim holds water. If anything, the representation seems contrived already compared to the reality I see.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Sriracha | 4 hours ago
1 like

I tried the same on DuckDuckGo which uses Bing as its engine, I believe. The top eight images were all white.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to hawkinspeter | 4 hours ago
0 likes

But the article is about "Google Images"

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Sriracha | 4 hours ago
0 likes

Sriracha wrote:

But the article is about "Google Images"

Yeah, I was just curious as to how different it might be

Avatar
Sriracha replied to hawkinspeter | 4 hours ago
0 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

Sriracha wrote:

But the article is about "Google Images"

Yeah, I was just curious as to how different it might be

Which begs the question - who decides the ratios? The article holds "the authorities and other organisations" accountable. And, I notice DuckDuckGo does surface a few heavier builds.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to dh700 | 4 hours ago
1 like
dh700 wrote:

The referenced example was poorly chosen, but that doesn't change the point. Just perform a google images search for "cyclist". The enormous majority of results are skinny white males, with a few skinny white females thrown in. I scrolled many pages through those results, and other than a couple instances of Biniam Girmay and, oddly, a bunch of Daniela Larreal Chirinos, just about every person was skinny and white -- and those two professional bikeracers are skinny as well.

Indeed, if you Google "cyclist" (not what the article did) then you get overwhelmingly sports cyclists. No surprise that they have the physique typical of their sport. If they had complained that cycling is overwhelmingly portrayed as a sport (and hence the "lycra clad" stereotype) rather than a leisure or utility endeavour then I might agree.

Latest Comments