The solid white line, 50mph speed limit and oncoming vehicle did not put this driver in their company van off squeezing past a cyclist.
road.cc reader Lew told us it "happened last month on my commute to work", just inside the Warwickshire County border with Leicestershire, close to the M69 approaching the village of Wolvey.
"The climb I am on has a solid white line as it approaches the brow of the hill because there is a junction on the left and the road starts to descend again after the junction. It is a 50mph road but I can climb it at around 15mph. Two drivers cross the white line to pass me. The first driver doesn't put anyone at risk but the second driver forces the oncoming driver to move to the edge of his lane to avoid a crash.
"Once I stop shaking my head you can see why there are solid white lines on that piece of road. A driver is approaching on the other side of the road and another driver is pulling up at the junction. As the driver on the opposite side of the road comes level with me the driver of a ScS company van starts to overtake me. The driver doesn't cross the centre line of the road."
Taking the footage to the driver's employer the road.cc reader was disappointed to eventually hear back from a Technician Network Manager, only to say:
I identified the driver from your video evidence and I’ve spoken to him backed up by an email, asking him to follow the law of the land and be courteous to other road users. He is sorry that he has caused distress.
I have also sent the details from the government website regarding amendments to the rules concerning cyclists and pedestrians to all of the Technician network to support these changes.
"I though ScS should have taken a stronger stance with the driver," the cyclist explained.
"I have reported other drivers to their employers for similar incidents and I have seen those drivers change their driving behaviour. Sometimes being reprimanded by the employer has a greater effect than a warning letter from the local constabulary.
"I eventually saw the vehicle again and recorded the registration number but by then it was after the 10 day reporting period for Operation Snap."
> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?
Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.
If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.
If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).
Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.
> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling
Add new comment
8 comments
Not that it matters because it was a shocking OT but I think the van can legally cross the white line as its dashed on his side; it was solid when they other cars squeezed past.
Yes you are correct. So there is video evidence of 3 infractions and our 'busy' coppers do fa. Surprised the cyclist didn't get a record of 'non-crime hate incident' - yes it's a thing look it up - for swearing.
If you read the article properly you'd have realised that the matter in question wasn't reported to the Police. But of course one should never allow fact to get in the way of prejudice
In Australia, it's legal to cross a solid line to pass a slow moving vehicle like a cyclist; really, the only issue with this is the proximity of the van passing, which frankly, happens to me regularly every day I commute.
Bicycle haters in abundance in Oz too then?
I eventually saw the vehicle again and recorded the registration number but by then it was after the 10 day reporting period for Operation Snap
I have reported other drivers to their employers for similar incidents and I have seen those drivers change their driving behaviour
The first quotation indicates that action was a non-starter. 'I'm glad to hear it' is the response to the second. It is not my experience. The employer, if it replies at all, invariably says 'we take this very seriously'- and then does nothing so I don't bother. I am collecting evidence for major complaints, so I did write to Stagecoach Bus over the incident below. The Assistant Operations Manager wrote back with this exact quotation:
Stagecoach Ref: ME 13966
I am sorry that you have had a reason to contact Stagecoach regarding the bus not allowing adequate room when passing you whilst you were cycling. I have viewed the CCTV footage and the bus at the start of the procedure does have adequate space. There is a vehicle parked on the pavement and another car is approaching in the opposite direction, the bus has to move over to allow the other vehicle to pass safely. In saying that the driver should have been more proactive in reading the road ahead and waited until there was adequate space to pass you safely with the correct clearance.
I will be speaking to the driver and to be honest I was a bit shocked when I traced the driver involved as they are a cyclist themselves, but I am aware that this is not an excuse. Along with all the new guidelines we have placed notices around the depot and on our internal social media advising our drivers of the changes.
The terminally gullible may think this is adequate, but I have collected many incidents at the hands of Stagecoach Psycho-drivers and no tolerance remains. The more observant will notice a couple of give-aways: the bus had to shove you into the gutter because a car was coming the other way, and you are less likely to damage the bus and we couldn't care less about cyclists and the driver [involved as they] are a cyclist themselves. Even setting aside the appalling politically correct circumlocution (as if it matters whether I know the driver is male of female!), it shows how dim the manager is and how little she knows that guilty drivers always claim 'I'm a cyclist myself'- it means 'I have been on a bike at least once in my life'. Things are getting worse, not better.
I wish the police had two categories
for offences requiring a NIP within 14 days, and those withiut such a deadline. Where an accident has been caused - and avoiding action counts as such - no NIP is required.
Report every single driver that does this, even if you have a police force who do nothing other than acknowledge the incident.