Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Near Miss of the Day 802: The most pointless overtake ever?

MUST. GET. IN FRONT...

Must get in front (or MGIF to those in the know) denotes a driver who just has to get in front of a cyclist (or any other road user, for that matter), often at truly pointless or unsafe moments, such as today's Near Miss of the Day...

Dan from Stoke-on-Trent is today's submitter, and was cycling home at the start of June when this motorist decided it was worth racing in front to make sure they could turn left and not wait behind him any longer.

The saving? "Literally one second," Dan told us.

> Near Miss of the Day 801: Van driver almost collides with cyclist... but police ignore footage, rider says

"I was cycling home from work in the Tustall area of the city when the driver of the white Mercedes decided to overtake me and then immediately turn left in front of me to save literally one second, narrowly inches from clipping my front wheel."

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

23 comments

Avatar
joe9090 | 2 years ago
1 like

Did they even bother indicating?

Avatar
mdavidford | 2 years ago
4 likes

I wish people wouldn't abuse the word 'literally' like that.

It clearly saved them less than a second.

Avatar
Philh68 | 2 years ago
8 likes

It's not saving a few seconds, it's stealing them from someone else. Any cyclist knows that the time the driver saved themselves is several seconds less than they took from you by forcing evasive action, incurring a loss of momentum and most likely having you caught in the wrong gear.

Avatar
IanMSpencer | 2 years ago
5 likes

I note that the reason it was a near miss was that the cyclist braked to avoid a collision - you can hear the timing of it on the soundtrack.. That was far worse than it looked.

Avatar
brooksby replied to IanMSpencer | 2 years ago
4 likes

Exactly, like when someone pulls out on you at a junction or on a mini roundabout: if you have to brake to avoid a collision then they did not have room to safely carry out their maneouvre.

Avatar
quiff | 2 years ago
1 like

Awful. And to compound it, did you spot the MGIF driver in the dark car overtaking the MGIF white car?! 

Avatar
Sriracha replied to quiff | 2 years ago
2 likes

What, the other Merc driver, who overtook despite the big centre-line keep left arrow? They were shifting!

Avatar
EK Spinner replied to quiff | 2 years ago
0 likes

well spotted, that was awful driving, I wonder if the lefthooker had started indicating left before (nearly) pulling out for the overtake, and the driver of the dark car (as so many do) took this as a carte blanche to save a millisecond by overtaking at a junction whn they clearly could see everything.

Avatar
Owd Big 'Ead | 2 years ago
1 like

Atrocious driving.
I'd have ridden straight into the back of them, completed a dramatic fall off the bike and sued them for every penny I could.
It's the only way these fools will learn.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 2 years ago
2 likes

The registration is clear, so was it reported to the police?

Avatar
Alessandro | 2 years ago
6 likes

That's not a case of MGIF; that's a case of DGAF (don't give a f**k). 

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
1 like

Normal left hook really. I had similar here on Sunday when the driver came from behind and decided to closepass / bear left when I was going "straight" on. Camera had already ran out of battery unfortunately. 

Actually feeds in to the signalling left comments from the other thread. I ALWAYS carry on straight along the main carriageway, however drivers behind and ones already at the junction seems to believe the lack of signal means I must be turning off so pull out or overtake. What is not showing on the streetview is the cars normally parked on the bend which means taking primary leads me into conflict with oncoming cars as well. 

Avatar
brooksby | 2 years ago
1 like

Had the driver of the Mercedes even noticed that Dan was there?

Avatar
Sriracha replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
7 likes

That's a damn good question! I think there are some drivers who basically fail to register cyclists as road users. They see them, but that's it, and they see them as static objects. A bit like they see a litter bin on the pavement - it's there, but not really relevant to their driving decisions, and having seen it once there is no need to look again.

Avatar
Flintshire Boy replied to Sriracha | 2 years ago
0 likes

.

Well put.

.

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
1 like

I'm sure if you asked them about the incident, their perception would be that they'd left plenty of space.

I see quite a few passes where oncoming cars have had to brake or swerve, even stop, and I suspect that the driver still files it as "well judged" in their memory banks.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to IanMSpencer | 2 years ago
2 likes

IanMSpencer wrote:

I'm sure if you asked them about the incident, their perception would be that they'd left plenty of space.

Yes, I've lost count of the number of times when I've shouted out in shock and surprise at a close pass, only for the driver to stop and tell me that they gave me plenty of room.  If they have such poor spatial awareness, should they be allowed to drive?

Avatar
stonojnr replied to eburtthebike | 2 years ago
2 likes

Had a driver yesterday attempt to pass on a narrow road, as i turned to shout "No!", saw the front bumper was no more than 2 inches from my leg, had they carried on with that pass, theyd have hit me. I can't begin to imagine how poor their spacial awareness was to drive like that, but I suspect drug driving had to be a major factor.

Avatar
Owd Big 'Ead replied to stonojnr | 2 years ago
2 likes

I watched a young man walk out of a pub last night, get into his car and light up a fat joint before driving away.
It was so blatant that it had to be habitual, an action carried out subconsciously.
No one else seemed to give a shit, but I reported it ASAP.

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to Owd Big 'Ead | 2 years ago
2 likes

When my daughter was on patrol in Sheffield, it was quite regular for her to issue fixed penalty notices for smoking pot in cars. As the police had no budget for drug testing kits, they only had one alcohol breath test kit for all the patrol cars at the time, she could not stop them from driving.

I'm sure many cyclists using back lanes and quiet corners come across wide-eyed pot smokers who are going to drive once they've toked up. Either end of the pedestrian bridge by J5 of the M42 is a popular spot for example, and we quite often will comment on the reek of wacky backy when cars pass us.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to IanMSpencer | 2 years ago
0 likes

IanMSpencer wrote:

When my daughter was on patrol in Sheffield, it was quite regular for her to issue fixed penalty notices for smoking pot in cars. As the police had no budget for drug testing kits, they only had one alcohol breath test kit for all the patrol cars at the time, she could not stop them from driving. I'm sure many cyclists using back lanes and quiet corners come across wide-eyed pot smokers who are going to drive once they've toked up. Either end of the pedestrian bridge by J5 of the M42 is a popular spot for example, and we quite often will comment on the reek of wacky backy when cars pass us.

Could she not have hauled them back to the police station for a blood test when she could smell alcohol on their breath?

Avatar
brooksby replied to IanMSpencer | 2 years ago
0 likes

Cycling into work, every morning I can smell weed wafting out of at least one car with it's windows open.  But then that's Bristol...

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 2 years ago
3 likes

He deserved a slap on the bodywork for that one.

Latest Comments