Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“This shouldn’t be normal, but it is”: Chris Boardman blasts “common criminal behaviour” after overtaking driver “almost kills” cyclists – “protected by hi-vis” – on charity ride

The near miss took place during a ride from Land’s End to John O’Groats to raise funds for retired service animals, leaving the charity’s founder “frightened and shook up”

The “common criminal behaviour” of dangerous drivers around cyclists needs to be eradicated before we “lose a vital transport choice”, says National Active Travel Commissioner Chris Boardman. The former Olympic champion made the comments in response to a video posted on social media today by the National Foundation for Retired Service Animals (NFRSA), which showed the charity’s founder Lady Bathurst, cycling the length of Britain to raise awareness for the foundation, on the receiving end of an extremely close pass by an oncoming driver overtaking a lorry at speed.

The shocking incident – which, as Boardman pointed out, saw three cyclists, supposedly protected by hi-vis clothing, “almost killed” – took place yesterday as Lady Bathurst, the former High Sheriff of Gloucesthershire, crossed the border into Scotland, two weeks into her attempt to ride her e-bike from Land’s End to John O’Groats to celebrate the NFRSA’s first year and to raise awareness of the charity’s work.

However, as the 58-year-old cycled alone on the hard shoulder, waving to two cyclists riding in the opposite direction, a motorist attempted to overtake a lorry driver approaching a bend in the road, missing Lady Bathurst by centimetres at speed and causing her to wobble.

The overtaking driver also manages to pull in front of the lorry just as another motorist, driving a support vehicle as part of the charity ride, appears around the corner.

Drone footage captured by the charity also shows the lorry driver narrowly passing the two cyclists on the other side of the road.

Lady Bathurst close passed by overtaking motorist during charity ride (National Foundation for Retired Service Animals)

“F***ing hell,” the Countess can be heard saying in the video, posted this morning on X, formerly Twitter, by the NFRSA, as she came to a stop on the hard shoulder shortly after the near miss.

“My knees are actually shaking. It was literally inches away. I was waving… and I laughed, and just wobbled out, and she… I very nearly was a dead Countess, not a cycling Countess!”

Posting the clip of the incident this morning, the NFRSA wrote: “It was such a happy day going over the border yesterday – but it nearly ended in disaster.

“Lady B was in the cycle lane, waving to fellow cyclists, just as a woman in a red car dangerously overtook a lorry, nearly hitting her, and causing the support car to swerve. Not a nice experience at all.

“Please motorists – be careful when overtaking on country roads.”

Reposting the video, Lady Bathurst added: “I was riding alone yesterday afternoon, in beautiful Scotland on the NFRSA Charity Bike Ride, when this happened. It was unbelievably frightening and shook me up.

“Please, when overtaking on country roads, be aware of what might be on the other side of the road. Thank you.”

Lady Bathurst close passed by overtaking motorist during charity ride (National Foundation for Retired Service Animals)

> Chris Boardman speaks about losing his mum at the hands of killer driver for the first time

Meanwhile, Active Travel England’s Boardman, who today called on the government to back and provide funding for cycling schemes at a meeting at 10 Downing Street, described the shocking incident as something that “shouldn’t be normal, but it is”.

“Three people – ‘protected by high viz’ – almost killed whilst doing something wholly beneficial for society. This shouldn’t be normal, but it is,” Boardman wrote.

“This is common criminal behaviour and we need to stop it or we will lose a vital transport choice.”

> Near Miss of the Day 873: Impatient driver overtaking tractor close passes cyclist and narrowly avoids oncoming HGV

Despite Boardman’s comments, some social media users responded to the video by arguing that Lady Bathurst should have been wearing hi-vis and that the charity cyclist was lacking “concentration” at the time of the close pass, prompting the Countess herself to intervene in the discussion.

“The top had reflector strips. I wasn’t wearing my coat. Hot!” she said, in response to one social media user who claimed that “cyclists MUST wear hi-vis clothing. It’s a no-brainer.”

“To be honest,” Lady Bathurst continued, “She was going that fast, I’m not sure she’d have seen me if I’d had fireworks coming out of my head!”

Replying to someone who accused her of “showboating”, she said: “Showboating? Really?? I was BEING FRIENDLY and returning a wave from a cyclist on the other side of the road. I was NOT expecting a red missile to narrowly miss me. What is wrong with you?”

Another social media user also attempted to pin at least some of the blame on the charity cyclist, arguing that “you took your eyes off the situation unfolding in front of you to smile and converse with the cyclist across the road instead of moving over to the left of the cycle lane as a precaution. That wave almost cost you your life.”

“I could have been doing a handstand and cartwheels,” Lady Bathurst pithily replied. “The fact is at whatever stage, I was safely within the lines of the bike lane. The motorist overtaking did so in a reckless manner and was doing well over 70.

“I’d argue the stupidity of the driver nearly cost me my life.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

107 comments

Avatar
Flâneur replied to chrisonabike | 1 year ago
4 likes

 It's the B7076 just north of Moffat, and there's a 6-lane motorway (the M74) right alongside for fast traffic. Between junction 14 (Elvanfoot) and junction 15 (Moffat) there's no side roads to speak of and only a literal handful of residences.  Frankly all non-access traffic that can use the motorway (so everything except tractors, mopeds and perhaps learners) should be forced onto it.

Avatar
Mars replied to STATO | 1 year ago
1 like

The truck driver may have seen the overtake coming and knew he couldn't give the cyclists on his side more space, particularly if he had seen the oncoming cyclist. It's bad design. If there had been oncoming traffic, particularly another truck, he wouldn't be able to move further over.

Avatar
Matthew Acton-Varian replied to Mars | 1 year ago
5 likes

At which point you slow down and wait for a safe spot. And then it is even more of a danger for the car driver because they performed a dangerous overtaking manouvre into oncoming traffic.

The probability is that there was not any traffic. At which point, the truck should have, in order to protect both cyclists, remained positioned centrally in the road to prevent a dangerous overtake from behind.

Avatar
Mars replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 1 year ago
0 likes

Slow down. Who? The motorist or truck driver? Assuming truck driver, as my comment related to them. Probably not time to slow down a large truck at 60 mph in reaction to a car overtaking, or to make it any less dangerous. The road design is just dangerous. The fact that there is a cycle lane makes drivers think it's ok to pass, because the cyclists are in their own lane. It's not seen as overtaking.

Avatar
Matthew Acton-Varian replied to Mars | 1 year ago
3 likes

Both. From the off, the truck driver should have slowed down well before approaching the cyclist if there was any indication that an overtake would be a risky manouvre. The maximum speed limit for a vehicle of that size would be 50mph on a single carriageway road too so 60mph is kind of moot - if the driver is doing that, automatically speeding = illegal. I did not mean at any point once committed to the overtake should the truck driver have hit the brakes. Having to hit the brakes on any overtaking manouvre is a guarantee that it was not safely and legally done.

As for the car, they have clearly performed an overtaking manouvre without checking it is safe to do so. Providing the truck driver is following the adjusted speed limit for larger commercial vehicles, a car is more than within its right to overtake as long as they do so safely and legally. But you neet to know what is ahead of you before you make such a manouvre.

I get the point on the design of cycle lane, and it is absolutely a design flaw that is misread by drivers and as such those actions are in clear violation of the Highway Code. But at the same time, we are not talking about a car going in the same direction as Lady Bathurst, but the opposite direction. The lane was therefore not clear for the car to perform a safe overtake on the truck.

Avatar
Mars replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 1 year ago
1 like

Yes, in an ideal world. The point is that because the cyclists are in cycle lanes motorists don't see this as overtaking. The truck driver didn't give the cyclists on his side as much room as he would if they were not in a cycle lane, the thinking being that otherwise what is the point of the cycle lane being there? I expect the overtaking car did check it was safe to overtake, in their judgement, but assuming they did see Lady Bathurst, they don't see her as being in the lane they are using to overtake. They see the lane as being clear, because the cyclist is in a separate cycle lane.
I make the point that the car could have been passing her from behind, because probably 9 out of 10 drivers would still pass her from behind at 50-60mph. Why would a car overtaking from the other direction read it any differently?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Mars | 1 year ago
4 likes

Yes, if only this road were wider we wouldn't have large, wide vehicles hooning down it, and longer sight lines would obviously lead to slower driving and safer overtakes...

I blame the design ... of the cyclist.  If only they were a lot narrower.  Or were equipped with much bigger brighter lights and were more visible - say they were wider, had four wheels, weighed a couple of tons and were capable of speeds of 70mph or so...

Avatar
HLaB replied to STATO | 1 year ago
1 like

Whilst it is certainly less than ideal I'lm willing to give the truck driver the benefit of the doubt on this occasion. Perhaps they had intended to give the cyclists more room but the recklessly speeding car driver suddenly appeared and they realised pulling out more would put a lot of lives at greater risk as would slowing down and waiting. The blame is predominantly on the car driver IMO.

Avatar
Rome73 | 1 year ago
9 likes

Chris Boardman is unfortunately correct. This is normal. It happens every day. 

Avatar
neilmck | 1 year ago
11 likes

I suspect the car driver does not think they have done anything wrong and does not remember the incident. This is also a common problem with narrow cycle lanes, once everyone has their own lane the leave 1.5m (or 1 m in towns) goes out of the window.

Avatar
AidanR | 1 year ago
16 likes

Seeing it in real time it almost doesn't look bad because it happens in the blink of an eye. But it is *really* bad. Terrifying.

Avatar
HoldingOn | 1 year ago
11 likes

I don't want to know how many of the Xcreters are blaming the cyclist, do I?
No. Don't tell me.

Avatar
ktache | 1 year ago
18 likes

She swore.

No motoring offence...

Isn't that how it works?

Avatar
the infamous grouse replied to ktache | 1 year ago
17 likes

it happened in scotland, so it's more of;

'were you killed? no? oh well then nothing to do about it.'

Avatar
the infamous grouse replied to ktache | 1 year ago
0 likes

[duplicated]

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to the infamous grouse | 1 year ago
16 likes

Polis Scotland. "Well we asked the registered keeper but they said they had no memory of the incident.
Mind how you go..."

Avatar
Clem Fandango | 1 year ago
29 likes

Holy crap.

But, I mean I saw a guy on a bike jump a red light the other day so I guess she doesn't deserve any respect. Or something.

Pages

Latest Comments