MP Jacob Rees-Mogg has criticised a bike lane after a Freedom of Information request by a councillor found that 59 people have been injured on the Keynsham High Street’s “optical illusion” bike lane, with cyclists raising concerns for safety and fearing a fatal injury if no improvements are made.
Keynsham South councillor Alan Hale found that an unusually high number of people, including both cyclists and pedestrians, tripped and fell on the High Street since the cycle lane had been put in place in last spring.
One person who tripped on the day it opened said, “There is some kind of optical illusion. There is a pale coloured kerb and a pale coloured line that look exactly the same,” while another person wrote that the cycle lane looks “like a kid drew it in their sleep”.
Now, MP for North East Somerset Jacob Rees-Mogg has chimed in on the debate on Twitter and called for an end to the lane, writing: “It should go back to being a two way street. This experiment has failed.”
> Jacob Rees-Mogg used racist term in House of Commons during swipe at “lunatic” cycle lane plans
This is not the first time that Rees-Mogg, who previously served as Minister of State for Brexit Opportunities and Government Efficiency, has made his distaste for cycling infrastructure known. In November last year, he branded 20mph speed limits as “an anti-motorist, cash raising ploy” by tweeting a Telegraph article which said the scheme has little impact on collisions... “largely because they are often ignored”.
In 2021, the former Leader of House of Commons also used a racist term to describe the Liberal Democrats during a swipe at “lunatic” cycle lane plans set out by a “terrible socialist council”.
The bike lane in Keynsham, however, has come under fire as the kerb only exists on one side separating the bike lane from the pavement, but not on the other where it meets the carriageway. Add to that they are painted in a very similar way, making things worse.
Some work has been done on the cycle lane with the hope of reducing the number of falls. The lane, which had been plain tarmac, was painted red in August in response to — at that time — 46 incidents of people falling.
But it seems that painting the lane hasn’t solved the problems, and that the lack of distinguishable features for the kerb is the main cause of injuries. One person said: “As I stepped over the [kerb], I was expecting a flat surface which wasn’t there. I rolled my left ankle, fell, and landed on my right knee, wrist, and shoulder in the road stopping traffic.”
Conservative councillor Hale, however, has called for the cycling lane to be entirely removed, reports Somerset Live. He said: “There can be no other local authority in the country that has created a development that has succeeded in seriously injuring 59 people at least and have done nothing to address the situation. We are elected to make our community safe, not to inflict significant injuries.
“To make it safe we need the administration and officers to take positive action, not sit on their hands.”
> Council paints over cycle lane after drivers keep clipping kerb at new pedestrian refuge
But councillor Mark Roper, Bath and North East Somerset Council’s cabinet member for economic development, regeneration and growth, defended the council’s response to the issues.
He said: “The new Keynsham High Street cycle lane is built to the government’s current LTN1/20 standards, and when some early problems were identified with the double kerb down to the road surface, a series of mitigations were put in place which has had the effect of substantially reducing the number of reported incidents.
“However we have now commissioned a Stage 4 Road Safety to suggest further improvements and mitigations and prevent any further issues. This will report back early in the next administration.”
Cyclists, however, are not too keen. One complaint on the council’s web read: “Amazed that the project team has said it is “compliant” and “we will not be making any further alterations”. This is dangerous and needs sorting urgently.
“Why are there different levels, and why does the design change along the street? In places road and cycle lane both “recessed" and then the “steps down 3 levels”. And all totally level in some places. And then the small island trip hazard outside the Post Office. Little distinction between white lines and pale stone “trip hazard” kerbs.”
Have you rode on Keynsham's so-called "optical illusion" bike lane? Let us know your thoughts on it at info [at] road.cc
Add new comment
42 comments
I'm looking out my office window: dull gray tarmac, dull gray pavement, dull gray kerb, dull gray day. You would expect carnage from this article, but seems all ok, no one falling over
The cycle lane in question is red!
(perhaps so the blood doesn't show)
At the risk of victim blaming, I wonder how many accidents occured while the pedestrian was otherwise distracted?
I wonder - but doubt - if this information was recorded.
Infrastructure must be safe for all users, however it seems rather odd that accident rate continued at a high level *after* the red finish has been applied.
Seems like the issue is with the kerb looking like the white line, so painting the lane red hasn't really addressed the issue. It also seems to be a confused design which isn't going to help matters.
I'm going to develop an app for people who are so engrossed in their phones they can't look up to see where they are going. Using the cameras, It will detect cars, pedestrians, cyclists , dodgy kerbs etc.
it wont alert them to the danger, it just calls an ambulance. Cos being injured is what the dumb cnuts deserve in the first place.
If it is causing accidents then it needs to be revisited. If cyclists are also complaining then clearly there is a use case for having the cycle lane rather than take it out.
Calling for the lane to be removed is kinda stupid, when the issue is obviously the particular implementation. Wouldn't it just be easier to repaint the kerb?
Of course, Rees-Mogg is going to try to politicise it in a divisive manner rather than attempting to improve anything.
I think this one is just down to "new". It may sound a bit heartless but - just like children - adults fall over not infrequently. All humans are easily distracted / confused.
When something in the environment changes humans time need to re-train - and so new things that aren't universal are even harder because people don't get regular refreshers.
This is needed because doing things consciously (or even "remembering to remember") is a very effortful process. We can only apply that very narrowly and this kind of thought is too slow for dynamic applications (psychology rabbithole alert!). (Even basic recognition is a bit slow - although thankfully training helps this). So almost all the time we rely on our heuristics / stored routines / pattern matching and "muscle memory".
Maybe he means the vehicle lane is still causing death and injury after decades - and it's time to remove that failed experiment?
Personally I feel the experiment of having Victorian Clippy as a MP hasn't gone too well either. Although to be fair it's been a boon to satirists and journalists.
Is he still wet-nursed by his nanny?
At a risk of starting a firestorm, the experiment of Brexit that the honourable representative for 1864 supported hasn't gone too well, either...
You can prise the tangible benefits out of my cold, dead hands
Pages