A ‘Save The Lane’ protest will be held outside Kensington Town Hall this evening against the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea’s plans to rip out emergency cycle lanes on Kensington High Street – but, on a day when Mayor of London Sadiq Khan accused the council of making “a knee-jerk response” to opponents of the scheme, the councillor responsible for the borough’s roads has insisted it will not be “bullied into submission.”
This evening’s protest outside the town hall on Hornton Street, just off Kensington High Street, is billed as a “peaceful direct action” and is being held jointly by the campaign groups Stop Killing Cyclists and Extinction Rebellion.
Last night, members of both groups prevented contractors from starting to remove plastic wands marking out the bike lane on Kensington High Road.
However, further east – and, in what is likely to be an unwitting piece of symbolism, right outside the Dutch embassy – workers were able to remove wands.
On Tuesday, parents, children and teachers from Fox Primary School, which lies near Kensington High Street, were joined by cycling campaigners as they called for the council to retain the lane – with some of the pupils ‘adopting’ the wands that mark it out (the Grinch in the picture below being the Conservative London Assembly member who had last week called for the cycle lane to be ripped out).
But speaking on LBC this morning, Labour Mayor of London Khan slammed the council’s decision not to give the cycle lanes more time to enable their impact to be assessed properly, and also threatened to claw back the money provided to install them.
He said: “Kensington High Street is the responsibility of the council. We are trying to persuade them to do the right thing for the 4,000 cyclists.
“It cost us £300,000 of taxpayers’ money to put this cycle lane in – money from across the country.
“The council have persistently refused to allow cycle lanes in their borough. This cycle lane is working. It’s used by thousands of cyclists. The council is ripping it out because a few people have signed a petition. Many of them are not residents. Many of them are not Londoners.
“What we should do is let the cycle lane bed in for some time. After a few months we can review it. There is nothing wrong about tweaking things or changing it.
“This seems to be a knee-jerk response, which I’m definitely against, and I’m looking to get our money back,” he added.
But writing on the RBKC website today, councillor Johhny Thalassites, the council's lead member for planning and transport, insisted: “Threatening us with legal action or financial penalties will make no difference to our decision, London boroughs aren't here to be bullied into submission through sanctions.”
He said that the council was “still looking at ways to improve cycling provision, long term,” but added that “our focus is likely to shift [away from Kensington High Street] to alternative schemes that have a positive impact for our residents” – in other words, quiet routes on secondary roads.
It’s the second time in less than 18 months that Khan and RBKC have come into conflict over cycle lanes on main roads, with the council last year withdrawing its support for a planned cycleway through Holland Park Avenue at the eleventh hour.
Add new comment
11 comments
There's a petition on Change.org asking Sadiq Khan to take over RBKC's main roads, with nearly 1300 signatures so far this week:
https://www.change.org/KensingtonBikeLanes
Signed!
According to the Standard he's looking into just this
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/sadiq-khan-high-street-kensington...
From their own transport policy
"Our busy road network and densely populated area means that it is impractical to allocate road space specifically to bicyclists."
This is clearly a lie, as the cycle lane has been there, so it definitely is practical to allocate road space specifically for cyclists, but the one thing the quote does demonstrate beyond any doubt, is that the council is blatantly anti-cyclist.
Much space has always been available for parking single-occupant-carrying motor vehicies
indeed, but what I hadnt realised till I watched a couple of youtube videos on this lane (just google them), they actually allocated a whole lane from the road to it. There I am, and Im sure many others around the country, riding in these new cycle lanes the emergency funding provided that are just about navigable around the drain covers without colliding with the bollard separation, that some riders do report are claustrophobically close, and K&C council went & built the Rolls Royce (of course) version, thats more than comfortably wide enough to ride side by side, ideal for parents riding with children to school as you can just ride alongside them and be protected from the traffic. Without the bollards there is no way on earth youd be able to ride like that on that road.
Now theres a point in this that says thats actually what we should all be getting regardless, but I do wonder had K&C not been so bold on the width of these cycle lanes, if this would have caused as much stir.
something to ponder anyway, and rather than sign a petition asking the mayor (who already seems to be on board even if it amounts to no action) to do something, just get behind the London cycling campaign instead https://membership.lcc.org.uk/tell-kc-keep-kensington-high-street-cycle-...
Yes, it's strange that they made the lane so wide, especially as they are way behind most boroughs in implementing healthy residential streets, controlled parking zones and other measures that put people first. The few other places that did it grudgingly seemed to do so deliberately badly so they justify ripping them out once a few loudmouths kicked up a fuss. So a wide safe one that immediately became used by 4000+ a day, allowing local school kids to cycle on a previously nasty stretch shows what can be done. Only a respiratory pandemic made them even try, despite having declared a Climate Emergency a few years ago and commiting to zero emissions by 2030. K&C had previously steadfastly failed to take action on Kensington High Street which has a terrible record for collisions - since the year 2000 there have been more than 130 serious or fatal collisions; I hate to add, these figures are similiar to those of Grenfell, which was also on their watch.
RBKC have no backbone. It's all very well them saying they won't be bullied into submission, but they already have been, by Nigel Havers of all people.
They also seem to have no idea about the climate crisis, and no sense of right and wrong.
Don't underestimate our Nige just cos he's posh.....
He's not that tough; he hides from milk shakes.
Don't we all darling.....
I think you mean unrepentant drink driver Nigel Havers. And self appointed expert in road safety issues