Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Family sues lorry companies and city after toddler killed when parents moved into road to avoid truck parked in bike lane

“People have to care. The city has to care. Corporations have to care. They all need to respect bicycle lanes and the bicyclists using them,” Lily Shambrook’s parents said

The parents of a three-year-old child who was killed by a lorry driver in Chicago as her parents were forced to move out of a cycle lane due to a utility company’s truck being parked there are suing the owners of both vehicles, as well as the city, for wrongful death.

Elizabeth Grace ‘Lily’ Shambrook, who was being taken by her parents to a summer day camp, was sitting on the child seat of her mother Kate Snow’s bike as they cycled with her father Tim Shambrook on 9 June 2022 when they had to move into the road due to a Commonwealth Edison (ComEd) truck reportedly being illegally parked in the bike lane at a traffic light, reports ABC News.

That brought them next to an articulated lorry belonging to global food industry giant Mondelez, and when the driver of that vehicle moved away from the traffic lights, he knocked Ms Snow and her bike over, with Lily crushed beneath the rear wheels of the vehicle.

Clifford Law Offices, which is acting for the parents, has now filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Cook County alleging negligence on the part of ComEd and Mondelez, as well as Penske Truck Leasing, which employed the driver of the articulated lorry.

The city of Chicago is also being sued for “wilful and wanton misconduct” in relation to its failure to monitor ComEd’s actions after issuing it a city permit and for failing to effectively protect and separate cyclists using the bike lane from other traffic.

Richard Burke, a partner at the law firm, said: “Multiple factors converged to make this an unsafe location and intersection on the day this happened.

“That starts with the fact that Kate Snow – Lily's mom – was riding in a designated bike lane on what is primarily a residential neighbourhood.”

Burke added that the infrastructure was meant to allow people to cycle “with ease and presumably with safety, and so they were doing exactly what they were entitled to be doing on the street.”

> Bus company investigates employee filmed driving on cycle lane and pavement

On the other hand, the complaint alleges negligence on the part of ComEd for “intentionally and knowingly usurping use of the designated bike lane” and illegally parking in an “unsafe” place.

Mondelez and Penske Truck Leasing are also accused of having “negligently operated, managed, maintained and controlled their tractor-trailer truck”, “driving their vehicle without making sure it was safe to do so”, and for allegedly continuing to drive on after colliding with the Ms Snow and her child.

Finally, the city of Chicago is being sued for “wilful and wanton misconduct”, as the law firm’s senior partner Robert Clifford argued that the authority’s “concern for others” was missing when it allowed ComEd to drive and park its large and heavy vehicles in residential neighbourhoods.

“The City of Chicago issued a permit to ComEd without adequate concert for the size and amount of heavy equipment that would be brought into the neighbourhood, or where their vehicles actually would be parked,” Clifford said.

“We all co-exist in a society where it takes cooperation and concerns for others who need to do their jobs to ensure that senseless tragedies like this cease. That concern was missing.

“The flagrant and repeated disregard for the safety of bicyclists and lack of respect for designated bike lanes by operators of trucks and vehicles create deadly hazards that simply can’t be tolerated.”

> "Absolutely unacceptable": HGV driver blocks protected cycle lane... at dangerous junction where urgent safety works followed cyclist's death

Following the youngster’s death, the city of Chicago announced that it would place concrete barriers alongside cycle lanes to stop motorists from entering them.

It has also passed a law requiring signs to be put in place warning cyclists when construction work is taking place within bike lanes – although Mr Shambrook and Ms Snow said such measures were “too late for Lily”.

They said: “In her honour, we are forever committed to making Chicago a safer biking community so that her death wasn’t in vain.

“People have to care. The city has to care. Corporations have to care. They all need to respect bicycle lanes and the bicyclists using them.”

“Hopefully, this lawsuit will open the eyes of many because we would never want this tragedy to happen to any other family anywhere.”

> Cyclist narrowly avoids collision as lorry driver mounts bike lane to park in much-criticised infra

The clear dangers associated with the drivers of large vehicles driving or parking in cycle lanes has been an issue covered frequently on road.cc in recent months.

In November, a bus company in Dublin announced that it was carrying out a “full investigation” after one of its employees was filmed driving a double-decker on both the cycle lane and footpath in order to undertake a queue of traffic.

The shocking video, which was captured on a motorist’s dash cam, prompted local Green Party councillor Carolyn Moore – speaking at a meeting on the Road Safety Authority’s ‘Be Safe, Be Seen’ campaign, which encourages cyclists and pedestrians to wear bright, reflective clothing at night so they can avoid being struck by motorists – to call for the campaign to instead focus on the behaviour of drivers.

Later that month, a lorry was spotted parked on a protected cycle lane, forcing cyclists to ride back out alongside traffic on Oxford’s notorious Plain roundabout.

The bike lane in question had just been completed earlier that week as part of the local council’s plans to improve safety measures for cyclists at the infamously dangerous roundabout, where University of Oxford researcher Dr Ling Felce was killed when she was struck by a lorry driver in March 2022.

And on Thursday’s live blog, we featured a cycle lane on Liverpool’s Dock Road which was not only covered in broken glass but also blocked by a parked oil tanker.

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

20 comments

Avatar
mattw | 1 year ago
2 likes

Seems to be a limited investogation.

Why no mention of the truck being parked so close to the intersection that it is across the crosswalk?

Avatar
Rome73 | 1 year ago
1 like

I don't know the details  - was the articulated lorry stationary when the mother cycled up and waited on the inside of the truck?

'That brought them next to an articulated lorry  . . . . . '

That seems to imply the lorry was already stationary. 
But can I just remind people - when you are on you bike never cycle up the inside of a lorry. I teach lots of HGV drivers. They cannot see you if you are on their inside. Wait behind, a few metres behind and let the lorry pull away. 
this is an awful story and a really sad waste of a young life. 

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Rome73 | 1 year ago
3 likes

The video seems to indicate the lorry driver passed them 20metres or so before the lights. He was also aware the side of him was cycle lane so although there first (barely) I would have thought he would be checking to be sure before moving off.
Although I agree I wouldn't be squeezing into a gap, I suspect the question is how tight a gap initially being as it was the rear of the lorry that caught the bike so the driver could have been turning into the cycle lane himself after the junction. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
6 likes

As much as I dislike vehicles parking within magic paint, I don't think they create danger by themselves. I'd consider that the moving traffic has to be held accountable for managing the danger that they introduce and not be running over people.

It's frustrating because there's a lot of poor drivers out on the roads which is why cyclists want separated infrastructure in the first place and then the selfish drivers cause problems with that as well.

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
9 likes

But look how they behave: if there's a parked vehicle, many motorists seem to expect the cyclist to stop and then wait for a gap in traffic to rejoin the flow.  Very few motorists seem to be willing to just ease off the accelerator to create such a gap... (because then they'd be following a cyclist, and can't cope with that).

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to brooksby | 1 year ago
5 likes

Quote:

if there's a parked vehicle, many motorists seem to expect the cyclist to stop and then wait for a gap in traffic to rejoin the flow.

Recent example of this:
I was cycling home on Friday here and there are regularly cars parked where the blue cars are. If you turn around and look at the lights, you can see they have four lanes, with the centre two going straight into a three lane merge in turn to take it to two. I regularly get close passed here by cars deciding I will either stop, or be able to ghost ride through the car parked whilst they use the lane I'm in to undertake the merging traffic. On Friday it was a ring and ride minibus who decided I shouldn't need any room even though he had a whole lane to move into.  

Avatar
NOtotheEU replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 1 year ago
4 likes

Dual carriageways are great aren't they? Drivers think they can pass a cyclist without even leaving the left lane (even while undertaking an HGV) so why on earth would a cyclist need to leave the left lane ever?

Avatar
Krislord replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
0 likes

I agree. It's not ideal having lanes blocked but if there was a valid reason to be there then it's up to the other road users to safely navigate the obstacle.

The actions of the driver who crashed shouldn't automatically mean some blame lies with the stationary truck.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Krislord | 1 year ago
4 likes

Krislord wrote:

I agree. It's not ideal having lanes blocked but if there was a valid reason to be there then it's up to the other road users to safely navigate the obstacle.

The actions of the driver who crashed shouldn't automatically mean some blame lies with the stationary truck.

I don't know what would qualify as a valid reason, but generally that would mean closing the lane and putting up warning signs etc. or using hazard lights if it's an emergency vehicle.

Avatar
ShutTheFrontDawes replied to Krislord | 1 year ago
9 likes
Krislord wrote:

I agree. It's not ideal having lanes blocked but if there was a valid reason to be there then it's up to the other road users to safely navigate the obstacle.

The actions of the driver who crashed shouldn't automatically mean some blame lies with the stationary truck.

You do know that having a "valid reason" for doing something illegal doesn't magically make it not illegal, right?

And being illegally and unsafely parked most certainly should be a reason for the owners of the truck to take some of the blame.

If the truck hadn't been illegally and unsafely parked, the collision certainly might not have happened.

Avatar
IanMK replied to Krislord | 1 year ago
2 likes

If an industrial site is having essential work done I would expect a risk assessment be done in advance. If something went wrong any action taken by the HSE would be judged against this risk assessment. I'm not really sure why that principal wouldn't apply to anyone using public land as part of any work being carried out. The basis of any prosecution against the parked vehicle would need to show that the companies assessment reduced risk to be as low as reasonably practical if it didn't then they are surely at least in part liable.

Avatar
Krislord | 1 year ago
0 likes

A sad incident but it's not clear from the article why the truck was there. Utilities need to be maintained and that often means blocking paths/roads/cycle paths. 
 

was the truck parked there to maintain the utility network, or so the driver could eat lunch?

Also there's no mention of what criminal charges have been filed, which could suggest it was an accident according to criminal law. 

Avatar
efail replied to Krislord | 1 year ago
8 likes

The lorry should have parked in the road.

Avatar
Krislord replied to efail | 1 year ago
0 likes

That wouldn't be safe either. You'd be driving cars into the cycle lane of the truck. 

Avatar
ShutTheFrontDawes replied to Krislord | 1 year ago
5 likes
Krislord wrote:

was the truck parked there to maintain the utility network, or so the driver could eat lunch?

Irrelevant and illegal in either case.

Avatar
Krislord replied to ShutTheFrontDawes | 1 year ago
0 likes

I don't think that's true. Not familiar with US processes but I'd expect you file some form with the local authority or the utility company may have automatic powers when conducting repairs. 

Avatar
ShutTheFrontDawes replied to Krislord | 1 year ago
10 likes
Krislord wrote:

I don't think that's true. Not familiar with US processes but I'd expect you file some form with the local authority or the utility company may have automatic powers when conducting repairs. 

Re-read the above article and the video. The truck was parked otherwise than in accordance with the permit the company obtained and in a location that was illegal.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Krislord | 1 year ago
3 likes

If you watch the video, they indicate the parked truck should have been around the corner in the designated green areas as that had been the permitted section for the work vehicle. But even then, where it was parked would have been safe for cyclists if the driver had decided to park level with the kerb but instead seemed to be parked a metre out which meant it overhung the cycle lane considerably. 

Avatar
eburtthebike | 1 year ago
10 likes

“The flagrant and repeated disregard for the safety of bicyclists and lack of respect for designated bike lanes by operators of trucks and vehicles create deadly hazards that simply can’t be tolerated.”

Yes; not just in Chicago.

Avatar
brooksby replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
7 likes

eburtthebike wrote:

“The flagrant and repeated disregard for the safety of bicyclists and lack of respect for designated bike lanes by operators of trucks and vehicles create deadly hazards that simply can’t be tolerated.”

Yes; not just in Chicago.

So say we all.

Latest Comments