At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
It's next door to County Ups, which for obvious reasons isn't so popular with cyclists.
I have three bikes I am fond of each of them and not one has cost me more than £400. In fact two cost £80 and the other originally cost my family ...
Don't open at Edinburgh Fringe with that one.
Imagine writing such a pathetic, victim-ey article in a national newspaper.
I got something that'll beat you all .....
Aggrieved motorists?...
The fact that such self driving cars don't BMW/Audi drivers do exist is proof - as if it were needed - that Gods don't exist
Wouldn't generalisations about generations be, I don't know, "generationalisations"?
No chance of that ever being a human being.
No idea if Cancellara was using a motor or not, I hope not as I greatly enjoyed him as a rider, but the tech was certainly available, I can...