At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
A couple here that I thought were worth sharing if people hadn't seen them. They're not humorous. 1. Two contrasting styles of development
What a grim weekend!...
£70 car insurance??? £50 to service a car ???
In the world of browsers, Firefox is like Blanka Vas - outside the medals.
The dream bike build is very worth a watch.
The 40 mph limit seems to be working well in The Lakes District National Park, as far as I'm aware?...
I have these in the 700 x 32mm and run them tubless....
Watcing the excellent women's race today, it did occur to me to wonder if there's any rule against using a Quadlock or similar to secure a...
I'm trying to remember where I read about suggestions for improvements to the Op Snap submission system. It included the option for users to have...
There's a video knocking about somewhere of his old team mate Daniel Oss doing an uncannily good impersonation. ...