At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
The "gentleman" in question might want to consider the number of children killed and injured riding in cars every year in the UK (about twenty-five...
In Britain we are let down by our education system in terms of numerical skills,...
Guess that depends on your definition of 'works'.
Right wing politicians are working for big oil. They chase the dollar representing only themselves,
Another front garden sacrificed to cars.
Well it appears Velogames isn't overly good at getting races up too quick either. ...
Can't that be resolved with different gearing though? (Smaller chainring)
1981 Raleigh brochure on EBay - a missing link in the catalogues available on line. Bidding starts at £35. ...
It's probably in Romania by now, or Poland, but a picture would certainly help, size too?
Sounds like spam... which bike was used for the kit, please at least post pictures with the end result.