At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
YouTubers try cycling across England in a straight line......
I appreciate your very polite, well informed and case-specific responses....
Technically he's correct a close pass isn't an offence in itself, instead drivers are prosecuted for careless driving, which covers not leaving...
Agree - it is a bit triggering....
Yeah, I might do it, but best case I have another wheel that will crack in under 20k miles, right? I suppose there's some value in knowing they'll...
I had to check my calendar too...
That's portly. It means the smooth 3D printing looks cool but just adds weight.
My daughter agrees with him! Looking in the mirror I think I do too.
*sings* No no, no no no no, no no no no, no no no no cycling!
Yes to the above, but can we do better than 3 metres please for a bi-direction path, (at least 4, ideally 5) - if there are enough cyclists that it...