We've asked in the past whether an upgrade to carbon fibre wheels is worth it. Well, if these Cosine 45mm carbon clinchers are anything to go by then the answer is a resounding yes, and not just for performance – comfort also receives a boost.
Cosine is the new component wing of online retailer Wiggle. It started off with a range of wheels, two alloy and three carbon fibre, and by the looks of the pricing structure, value for money is the main drive.
> Buy these online here
For example, these 45s in for testing are priced at £600 – not bad for a set of full-carbon clinchers – and that price is the same for both the 30mm and 50mm-deep rim wheelsets. There aren't many on the market that can compete with that. In fact the only set we've tested recently that can match the Cosine is the Club Roost FCR50.
It's no point being cheap if you can't back it up with some kind of performance, though, and thankfully the Cosines aren't found lacking here.
At 1710g they aren't in the superlight category, but then again not many deep-section carbon wheels are because of the extra material. The acceleration of the Cosines is impressive and certainly belies what you'd expect from wheels of this weight.
The freewheel engagement of the Cosine branded hub is instant and the wheels really whip up to speed. I tested these on a bike that had been running the Mavic Ksyrium Elite wheelset that we reviewed a couple of months back and the extra 130g wasn't noticeable at all.
Comfort is the biggest surprise, though. Going from a relatively shallow alloy rim to a mid-depth carbon one with the same tyres was like letting 20-30psi of pressure out. It's not because they lack stiffness either; under hard acceleration and climbing there is no flex at the rim at all.
The rims are made by Gigantex, a company based in Taiwan which specialises in carbon fibre components and wheels for a lot of the big bike brands. They follow the latest style of wide rims with an internal width of 19mm (23.4mm external), which gives you a more rounded profile if you are using a wider tyre, 25 or 28mm, rather than a 'lightbulb' shape. It's much better for aerodynamics in terms of frontal area as the transition from tyre to rim is much smoother.
Trying out some 23mm tyres saw them stretched out to 25.5mm, with the wider profile increasing grip thanks to a larger surface area.
The shape of the 45mm deep rim is also more bulbous, with a rounded trailing edge that a lot of wheel manufacturers have claimed is more aerodynamic than a more traditional V-shape profile seen on earlier carbon wheels.
Whatever the science says, the Cosine wheels are quick and certainly roll well over undulating terrain. You get the odd bit of buffering from crosswinds, which might affect you a bit if you're a light rider, but I've certainly ridden much, much worse.
The hub bodies are 7075 alloy and come with sealed bearings. It's been a mild, wet winter so far in the south-west and these wheels have seen plenty of rain and standing water with no ill effects.
The only issue I did find was with the rear freehub body; the coating added to reduce wear and tear on the splines had been laid on a couple of microns too thick, making the fitment of the cassette hard work. After an initial fitting, the cassette body removed the coating from between the splines. It shouldn't be an issue long-term, though, as it's not in a position where the cassette body tends to 'bite'.
The rest of the build is completed with Sapim CX Delta spokes, 20 front and 24 rear, which are secured to the rim with brass nipples.
> Check out our buyer's guide to road bike wheels here
The braking surface has markings on it to make sure the pads sit below the actual lip where the clincher tyre locates – a good idea for long-term use. In terms of braking power, the included pads are very good. They feel like soft rubber and really grab hold of the rim, with a fair amount of modulation, even in the wet. It's one of the best carbon rim/pad compound combinations I've used.
Overall I rate the Cosine wheels very highly indeed. They offer a very quick, comfortable ride and are excellent value for money. The 45mm-deep rims make for a very usable wheelset for the majority of road and weather conditions. A rider weight limit of 90kg might limit their appeal to some, though.
Verdict
Brilliant value for money carbon clinchers – they're fast, stiff and comfortable
Make and model: Cosine 45mm Carbon Clincher wheelset
Tell us what the wheel is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?
Cosine says, "Designed to provide a blend of aerodynamic performance and agility; perfect for versatile cyclists who tackle everything from undulating sportive courses to long, flat distance rides."
They are very versatile. The rims are easy to ride in strong crosswinds and climb well too.
Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the wheel?
45mm mid profile full carbon clincher rims
Matte UD carbon finish
Low rotational weight for reactive performance
23.4mm external width for increased cornering stability
7075 Alloy hubs with smooth rolling sealed cartridge bearings
Sapim CX Delta® spokes with CN-14G Brass nipples
High Power Carbon specific brake pads included
COSINE custom rim tape
11 speed Shimano®/SRAM® compatible freehub body
Spacer supplied for 10 speed compatibility
Lightweight alloy skewers
Rider weight limit: 90kg
Spokes; Front; 20 Rear; 24
Rim depth: 45mm
Rim width: External; 23.4mm Internal; 19mm
Rate the wheel for quality of construction:
7/10
The tolerances on that freehub coating brings the score down a notch, other than that though the build quality is very good.
Rate the wheel for performance:
8/10
The Cosines are stiff yet surprisingly comfortable compared with an alloy rim.
Rate the wheel for durability:
8/10
Trueness has remained good, as have the sealed bearings over the test period.
Rate the wheel for weight
7/10
Pretty good considering the build; they ride quicker than their weight on paper would suggest.
Rate the wheel for value:
8/10
Very good value for full-carbon clinchers.
Did the wheels stay true? Any issues with spoke tension?
Yes, they remained true and tight.
How easy did you find it to fit tyres?
Both 23 and 25mm tyres fitted with ease just using your hands.
How did the wheel extras (eg skewers and rim tape) perform?
The rim tape is plenty wide enough for the rim bed. You also get alloy QR skewers which are basic but do the job. The most impressive component, though, was the stock pads, with impressive braking performance.
Tell us how the wheel performed overall when used for its designed purpose
A great all-rounder whether you're gunning it or just out for a long, steady ride.
Tell us what you particularly liked about the wheel
The comfort.
Tell us what you particularly disliked about the wheel
The overly thick coating on the freehub.
Did you enjoy using the wheel? Yes
Would you consider buying the wheel? Yes
Would you recommend the wheel to a friend? Yes
Use this box to explain your score
The 45mm Cosine Carbon Clincher wheels are really very good. The performance and stiffness benefits are impressive, but it's the comfort that is most noticeable over that of an alloy rimmed wheel. You can get lighter carbon wheels with a little more refinement but you'll pay a lot more for the privilege.
Age: 37 Height: 180cm Weight: 76kg
I usually ride: Kinesis T2 My best bike is: Mason Definition
I've been riding for: 10-20 years I ride: Every day I would class myself as: Expert
I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, club rides, sportives, fixed/singlespeed
Add new comment
13 comments
A one year warrantly is a bit rubbish, probably wiser to get handbuilts for a similar price and have some peace of mind that you haven't blown your cash if they break.
Just read an article in Cycling Weekly about the original Campagnolo Shamals in 1994....1885g for alu aero rims that take tubs.....
For a little bit more (£750) you can go to wheelsmith and get a set of 50mm gigantex carbon rims with the pair coming in at about 1450g. Best of both in my opinion.
Hubs look like Bitex? Reasonable reputation if so.
Those getting excited above need to consider what the wheels are being used for.
If you're time trialling or regularly pulling 20mph plus then a deep section wheel may well be for you . In the real world a deeper section will give lower drag at yaw angles less than 20 degrees - see the Aeroweenies website for more data.
If you're looking at more general applications then the 32mm alloy clinchers look to be an good all round compromise to me, although some may prefer a wider section like say a Pacenti SL23 build. But those are shallower and £100+ more expensive than the Cosine wheels.
The 30mm carbon version doesn't look like a good buy in comparison to the alloy version though.
Hi Stuart, could you comment on the hub quality?
Sorry for not belittling anyone with my comments. Will try harder next time.
The hubs are nothing flash to look at but are certainly solid performers. The wheels have been on the winter bike for about six or seven weeks and 90% of the rides have been in the wet and on mud and grit covered lanes, the hubs haven't suffered at all. No play, no creaking and as far as I can tell, no water ingress.
They roll smooth and the freehub pick up is precise and sharp. Basically if it was my £600 the hub quality would be exactly as I'd expected.
Hope that helps.
^^ Common sense on a wheel discussion, it won't catch on!
A trawl through most club's Strava records will show that the vast majority of riders average ~16mph on flattish rides, less than that for hilly.
how can £600 1700g carbon wheels be better than £280 1500g aluminium ones?
Looks.
Seriously though, you wont find a 45mm aluminium rimmed wheel that weighs 1500g for £280 or £600 for that matter. On the flat the 45mm rim will give you a measurable boost to your sustained speed. Once you reach 20mph, the effort to maintain it is far less than with a box aluminium rim.
Also, the damping effect of the rims to enhance comfort shouldn't be ignored either. When I switched from a carbon rim back to my aluminium Ksyrium, the harshness of the aluminium made it feel like I was riding round with flat. Very weird.
I think you will. The other new wheel from Cosine is the COSINE 32mm Alloy Clincher which has a reported weight of 1485g and retails on Wiggle for £250.
I can't wait to see the review of these wheels, these carbon ones are a bit meh in comparisson.
I'd rather a lighter wheel, that makes climbs more enjoyable than the comfort provided from Carbon rims any day of the week.
Key point in bold.
Ah yes, of course I am. I'm an idiot. My mistake.
No it wont. Even the very optimistic figures of the manufacturers of the
very best deep-section CF rims say that on a 40k time trial you *may* get up
to a 40 sec advantage. Since most of us don't time trial (let alone in
optimal conditions) and aren't Brad Wiggins either, the gains to our
"sustained speed" we're likely to see, if any, are not going to be
measurable.
Nonsense. At 20mph the difference is negligible. Since most riders average
speed is a good deal less than that on a ride, you'd be much better off with
a lighter low section rim: both financially and in performance terms.
I'll ignore it thanks because it doesn't exist. Through what mechanism do
you propose this "damping effect" occurs? And why is it greater than a lower
profile alloy rim?
You're imagining things.
Oh dear...
"It's much better for aerodynamics in terms of frontal area as the transition from tyre to rim is much smoother."
No, that's wrong.
"It's much better for aerodynamics in terms of frontal area..."
Wider rim = more frontal area = worse aerodynamics
"It's much better for aerodynamics ... as the transition from tyre to rim is much smoother"
Yes.
"Trying out some 23mm tyres saw them stretched out to 25.5mm, with the wider profile increasing grip thanks to a larger surface area."
No. It's more complicated than that.
Contact patch area is the basically the same regardless of tyre width, and is instead related to tyre pressure. So, if you run the tyres at a lower pressure, then the surface area will be larger.
But larger contact patch area doesn't necessarily mean better grip. What it can mean is reduced wear rates because the load is distributed more widely, enabling the use of a softer rubber compound, which then provides better grip.
"The shape of the 45mm deep rim is also more bulbous, with a rounded trailing edge that a lot of wheel manufacturers have claimed is more aerodynamic than a more traditional V-shape profile seen on earlier carbon wheels."
That depends - when the "apparent wind" is from straight ahead, there's very little difference between V and U shaped rims. When it's from an angle, eg crosswind, then the U shape is better, if designed well.