At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
It's standard to have a suspended sentence due to full prisons....
Only buy on Aliexpress if you can justify financially supporting intellectual property theft. In my personal opinion.
That might take out a few cows too, thus reducing the impact of the real scourge on public safety.
Perhaps you're running them at lower pressures / with extra weight? I've found they feel sketchy at least when cornering and I've had a few offs...
True ... but left to itself that notion tends to go the same way as instructing pedestrians, cyclists and SUV drivers to "share the road"!...
To be fair to them, it looks like a choice between that or a lot of sunken surfaces and ironworks further out.
...mostly among sports administrators, media, and cycling fans.
>THIS< is the primary reason for 99%+ for a camera!!!!!
At what point will politicians realise that no amount of effort can really protect vulnerable users on roads and that to keep people safe automatic...
You need to "guess" the corresponding post code as well. A bit of internet sleuthing should give you options.