At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Cough *plotaroute.com*
Sympathy is the least we owe Sir Bradley for his high achievement representing Britain. It takes a bit more life experience to understand the peaks...
Anger over Cornwall Council decision to offload 19 busy car parks...
I have had my first advisory letter for a close pass in Gloucestershire (always NFA up till then)...
Cycling will never be safe. If you can get an advantage pushing it a little more than everyone else then people will do it. They can punish people...
3 watts/kilo is really good for someone aged 50 (sorry, not wishing your life away, I know you're not quite there yet) so if you can get up to 250...
I have a Ragley Trig, which is steel, has masses of clearance plus everything needed for racks, mudguards. I have it set up with a 2x10 Campag...
Excellent, just the job! Thanks
Good point, it's England and Wales. Northern Ireland seem to have the same minimum and maximum penalties but I don't know if they work with the...
Are you confusing a clearly opinionated - nay, biased rag like road.cc with a balanced, respectable news organisation like the BBC?