At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
There is literally nothing else which is more thought through...
Is it cynical to suggest that more effort was put into catching them once they started attacking 'normal' people instead of just cyclists…?
A very good description of most cyclist's experiences I suspect. I can relate to the feeling on hearing a car approaching from behind. My own...
Agree. Add to that some typical lazy (I must stop as close as possible) driving....
I'll tell you one thing, he's not building a playhouse for the children......
? Last I heard, last week, he said he would make a choice between the Giro and the Vuelta once he'd seen the routes, have I missed something?
So they are very quick to remove potentially illegal caltrops (which is good), but try and tell them that some random Chinese factory is using...
I've not tried that one myself but have enjoyed others in that vein. Tart rhubarb in sweet buns - that is certainly a favourite, and on the more...
Just make that gate a modal filter (people can cycle through) and you're done....
Fair point(s) - although I don't suppose they're likely choices in this scenario!