At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Ah - reading comprehension fail on my part (partly due to confusing quote - the '24 hours a day' bit was irrelevant) - I'd thought the restrictions...
I agree with the idea of being able to create an account. It's surprising how much time can be wasted re-entering the same information over and...
Something like "Billy the Fish on a bicycle"?
I think they do over think it at times, but in this instance whover had chased Faulkner down, especially after they had paused and let her get a...
there's nothing "volatile" about common-sense and physics operating normally ...
Interesting...without wishing to demean the lady or underplay the seriousness of the situation, there's nothing journalists like more than dressing...
Pros: holds objects. Cons: bloody hideous.
A couple here that I thought were worth sharing if people hadn't seen them. They're not humorous. 2. A Short History of Traffic Engineering
The dream bike build is very worth a watch.
I have these in the 700 x 32mm and run them tubless....