At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Toddle off cynic. A great man posting about extremely awful things and you chose to say that? The UCI needs clinical experts like you ... toddle...
public pressure?
Said the spokesperson for Big Hookless
I think the complaint - if it is in good faith (which is a question...) - may stem from:...
Is that same sergeant as keen to prosecute drivers who stray into cycle lanes...? I'm not betting on it.
There's a lot going on in this report....
Hey FrankH (or are you Nigel in disguise). Take your shit-stirring and fuck off elsewhere....
Well - different reviewers, so different experiences - what works for one person can be annoying and fiddly for the next.
That's what the article seems to say. Surprised I didn't get an email from Komoot explaining the new fees, but that I'm excluded with that world...
we were SO lucky with the weather on this one. i've done the butt buster a month later in temperatures that never got above freezing