At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
"Come to (insert frisky UK town here) and enjoy a night out in one of the UK's famous A&E units"....
Being more positive - I'm loving the new cycle parking at Gard du Nord, and especially like the vending machine to go with the repair station.
True - more i look the more odd the whole thing (but of course there's probably lots of thought about balance when folded etc.)...
200 miles per week is a lot - far more than most cyclists, and certainly more than the 'can't afford a bike' survey respondents in the article...
Depends on how hard you throw them, I guess…
The collision was round the corner, but she's already diving up the inside as they go in to it. And inconvenient or not, you pass on the left.
Thank you very much!
Yeah! Bl00dy primary school pupils not being fully aware of journalistic guidelines
Highway Code Rule 0: "(a) Don't drive like a tw@t; and (b) do everything you can not to kill any other road user!"
Ah - reading comprehension fail on my part (partly due to confusing quote - the '24 hours a day' bit was irrelevant) - I'd thought the restrictions...