At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Social pressure is not a new thing. Sad
Reminds me of Cold War Steve's video for Sleaford Mods...
I'd say this is built in to dockless bike share, in the way that "parked on the footway" is built in to mass motoring......
An interestingly harsh punishment in current terms....
I have a couple of head torches, but they look like this Nicely angled down so you can see where you are treading.
Yepp, another vote for Argos, fantastic quality and realistic with their leadtimes. The only downside is the number of lovely bikes they have at...
I think that part of the reason for the limited mount is that the shaped 'road' beam means that it can't be mounted upside down, otherwise you'd...
Thanks for posting. Have signed as well and pleased to see it's over 100,000 so it will at least be raised....
Tom Dumoulin's half marathan time may be quick, but surely Chris Froome would be quicker??
Boss to designer, "Take a toot on the crack pipe and give it some more ugly injections"....