At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Sidelining the point here a little bit, but I was just looking at a Rapha video about Lachlan Morton's latest incredible venture of riding 648km in...
It's not that simple: https://bsky.app/profile/christopher664023.bsky.social/post/3lahwh7u6rk2t
Or, you can just look at them - it's pretty obvious when they're not going to work with a new chain. Then you can try them with old lengthened...
I bought 5 screw in storage hooks from local d.i.y store for £10. Does the same job 🤷♂️
Well it looks like they've got a page now. It says they'll accept video evidence but I haven't been through the whole process. Looks very similar...
Sorry, but the BBC is definitely tilting towards cycling after the Panorama debacle....
Unlikely. Not once he hears that it'll 'help Gore'.
Indeed I did. I can only assume the Mr Onion allowed himself to be interviewed and dropped himself in it by not accepting the caution. A caution...
Remember your hiplock D1000 is only as good as the street furniture it is attached to.
I feel this person's problems may be a little more deep seated than not wanting to pay ulez (although their car is exempt).