At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I think Livingston (no "e") has the best cycling infrastructure I have seen in Scotland. It has an extensive network of paths that are actually...
I'd say it is an extremely rare condition for most cyclists or runners.
or Team Bahrain ... selective outrage.
This website offers suitable data: https://www.automobiledimension.com/large-suv-4x4-cars.php
Perhaps park the goods in a US Customs Bonded warehouse and then import them out of there when the tariff nonsense settles down?...
Good to see a road.cc review of what must be one of the UK's best-selling 'proper' road bikes....
Another thing ruined by the Americans
Nice to see WvA featuring in the finale.
I have known more than one elder statesman of the club die of a heart failure while out on a ride. Sometimes I feel that's about to happen to me,...
Via the "wireless active steering system".