At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
The trouble is that policies such as this, or LTNs, or the phasing-in of electric cars, are never presented as what they are: the world bending...
That was the one (same name in Scotland). Haven't tried a Boris bike yet (or Ken/Khan-cycle ?) but my understanding is they're conceptually...
It does say '12S' on the chainring! All we need now from this 'club member' is the picture of the actual crank break
No because...
I think you may have misunderstood the word carnage....
Love the design. The limitation to 170 mm cranks sent me to the kickR
I'm not doing single track (no suspensions, only 30, 35 mm tyres) so 800 lumen is enough for me, on gravel type of trails at maybe max 20-30 km/h,...
I suppose journalists can just about be forgiven for not knowing the difference between CdA and Cd but supposed Engineers can't. CdA is NOT the...
There is a pHd student at work who has an Adidas backpack in reflective iridescence, looks oil slicky in the day. I love both oil slick and...
I think what you say has some sense to it (for WBD)....