Chris King, in collaboration with US carbon fibre bike brand Argonaut Cycles, has just launched the new T47 threaded bottom bracket, which introduces another new standard to an already crowded bottom bracket market, but one that its inventors claim solves all the problems that can afflict current pressfit bottom brackets.
The T47 bottom bracket is an oversized and threaded design. It has the same diameter shell as a pressfit30 bottom bracket, but with the threaded cups of a traditional BSA-threaded bottom bracket. It’s an open standard so any frame manufacturer can use it.
Many top-end frames use a pressfit bottom bracket. The wider and larger shell diameter means the whole junction can be beefed up, with an increased diameter seat tube, down tube and chainstays, intended to increase frame stiffness.
However, pressfit bottom brackets, with nylon cups that are pushed (or hammered) into the frame, require very tight tolerances to ensure a good fit. Quite often though pressfit bottom brackets can be unreliable, and prone to creaking.
- Review: Chris King Ceramic Bottom Bracket
Threaded bottom brackets are easier to install and are more reliable, but they do limit the choice of cranks and in the pursuit of increased frame stiffness.
“The issue lies within the tolerance creep between frame manufacturers and component companies.’ Says Bob Scales, Marketing Manager for Chris King. “The threaded system removes the performance risks associated with the convenience of the press fit products and ultimately delivers a more reliable, high-performance product to the rider.”
T47 brings the benefits of pressfit, namely improved frame stiffness, due to the larger bottom bracket shell, and compatibility with any axle standard, from 24 to 30mm and even Campagnolo.
- Bottom bracket reviews
The new Chris King ThreadFit 30i bottom bracket isn’t yet available, it will be launched early next year. It’ll be available for 30 and 24mm cranksets and a Campagnolo Ultra Torque version. No prices have been confirmed yet.
Don’t expect to see any mainstream manufacturers adopting this standard anytime soon, 2016 bikes are now available and most 2017 bikes are likely signed off already, but that does leave an opportunity for small frame builders to look at using this new bottom bracket, if it suits their requirements.
Why hasn’t anyone done this before?
Well, we have seen a similar system, Colnago’s ThreadFit82.5, first introduced on the C60. To get away from the issues common with pressfit bottom brackets, the Italian company developed a screw-in alloy cup which houses the bottom bracket bearings. The alloy cups are also replaceable.
Praxis Works has its Conversion Bottom Bracket. It’s a smart bit of kit which fits any pressfit shell and allows you to use outboard bearings, ideal if you want to use a Shimano, SRAM GXP or Campagnolo Ultra Torque crank in a 30mm pressfit bottom bracket shell.
Here’s a more detailed explanation from Ben Farver, owner of Argonaut Cycles:
"The PF30 is convenient to build a frame around allowing customers to use any crank on the market,” says Ben. “The issue, however, is with a press fit system, you have to hold a super tight tolerance in both the frame and bottom bracket. Often these tolerances work against each other.
“All in all, a PressFit system is the wrong style of engagement in a bottom bracket. Threads are really the way to go, but a larger bearing is still ideal. The traditional threaded BSA is great from a durability standpoint, but it limits a customer’s crank options. As a frame manufacturer I don’t want to have to talk someone into buying one of my bikes while at the same time talking them out of a crank they might want to use.
“My production manager and I were talking about all the challenges of PF30 one day, and thought, why don’t we just make a new standard that solves both problems? I called Jay Sycip, who runs the Cielo arm of Chris King, and we discussed the true consumer benefit of creating a threaded spec that leverages the larger bearing used in the PF30.
“We agreed that it would yield a much higher interface success rate, and more importantly, a better ride. So, this project is an attempt to solve a problem the entire bike industry is suffering from, and lead the way to a better, lasting standard.”
Add new comment
14 comments
Thanks Matthewn5 - that's good info for my build.
I've had no problems with PF386 on my Canyon, and the Shimano PF bearings were perfect 2 years later when I extracted them to move to Campag. So far no complaints from those, either, and I use the bike to commute so it's heavy use.
I recently bought a PF30 bike and having read the hundreds of bad reviews of PF30, put in a Praxis Works Campag conversion kit. Worryingly huge torque needed to get it right in so that the Campag crank bearings wouldn't bind, and had to tighten until the rubber ring compressed despite instructions, but it's all assembled now and no probs so far. It comes with the cups pre-installed so will only take Shimano 24mm spindles or Campag Ultra Torque, so no Super Record possible as it uses a difference diameter bearing.
Maybe the FSA converter is best, a threaded shim that provides a BSA thread on both sides, so you can use your choice of BSA compatible bearing. See for example http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/FSA-Threaded-Adapter-PF30-to-68mm-Bottom-Brack... - it's a also a hell of a lot cheaper than the Praxis Works kit!
Not another BB standard. When I buy a frame I just look for a british standard BB thread.
I'm sure I read somewhere that manufacturers also like PF BB's because they are simpler and therefore cheaper to make. But oddly the marketing speil makes no mention of this - it's all about theoretical improvements stiffness and sod long term durability, creaking etc.
I've just bought a PF30 frame to build up, but only after I researched the BB options thoroughly and concluded the praxis works converter BB was sound engineering that addressed the apparent shortcomings with PF BB'S.
No news yet on whether or not Shimano are on board with this, but if T47 can accommodate their BB86/92 press-fit system, I'm in.
Threaded bottom brackets have proven to be simple to use/service and cheap. Frame manufacturers should be forced to standardised this.
Why though do we need these larger spindles? The TDF was won this year on a standard size threaded BB.
Well, strictly speaking, the fact that it's a threaded BB with external bearings is kinda oversized already - to me threaded BB tends to mean square taper, perhaps I'm showing my age !
All I have to say is....
http://xkcd.com/927/
My thoughts exactly! I'd got as far as finding the comic to link to before I spotted your post.
Beat me to it as well!
If anyone else was doing this, I'd certainly agree. However, Chris King does seem to know rather a lot about bearings, and as a mechanical engineer I certainly agree with his critique of integrated headsets, so I suspect he may be on to something here.
However, the description in the article is awful and I have no idea what the new standard actually looks like. Would like to see a proper engineering drawing cross-section.
I hate new standards for (what appear to be no real benefit) but this sounds like a good thing.
At last a bottom bearing set that will work with all current standards. Don't make it too expensive and everyone will adopt it who use pressfit bearings