Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Five cool things coming soon from Sigma, Knog, Schmolke, Look and Rapha

Some more picks of the test pile before our reviewers give their full verdicts...

Bank holiday can't come soon enough, although this week on two wheels is being made a little easier by the weather gods as the sun continues to shine in the south west. Here's some of the best stuff we've been testing on our training rides and commutes these past few days...

Schmolke Roadbar Oversize Evo TLO handlebars

£359.00

Schmolke Roadbar Oversize Evo TLO handlebar.jpg

It's not very often we get products through the door that cost more than double in £'s what they weigh in grams, but the Roadbar Oversize Evo TLO from carbon experts Schmolke are one such example... weighing a staggeringly light 147g, these bars are road-specific and were made to give the best stiffness-to-weight ration of any handlebar in the world. With the drop at 126mm and reach at 78mm Schmolke have also designed them with optimal ergonomics in mind for riding in the drops or on the tops, and there are recessed cable grooves and an option to get Di2 routing holes drilled in to keep everything tidy. Is the performance huge like the price, or less so like the weight? Mat Brett's review will be in shortly. 
schmolke-carbon.com

Knog Oi Luxe Bell

£34.99

Knog Oi Luxe Bell Brass S.jpg

This super smart bell wraps around any drop bar so you barely notice it's there visibly, but you'll definitely know its there when you ping it. A loud yet distinctive and pleasing tone means you'll be heard from far away, and the Luxe version has a CNC machined ringer and brass dinger, plus a stitched leather shim and metal injection moulded stainless steel to make it a classy addition to your front end. Jez Ash will be reporting back to us on whether it works as well as it looks.  
silverfish-uk.com

Look Keo Blade Carbon Ceramic pedals

£180.00

Look Keo Blade Carbon Ceramic pedals-1.jpg

Look have added carbon bearings to their top-end pedals, claiming to have reduced friction by 18% which will be appreciated by the most discerning and fussy racers who want every advantage. The stack height of the pedal and cleat is just 14.8mm, and our scales tell us they weigh just 116g per pedal. Are they worth the extra cash? Liam Cahill will be giving us his tuppence worth soon. 
zyrofisher.co.uk

Sigma Rox 12.0 Sport Set GPS computer

£376.95

Sigma Rox 12.0 Sport Set GPS computer - nav menu.jpg

This big bucks GPS is being used by Tom Dumoulin and co at Team Sunweb this year, and you get a very comprehensive list of features on their top-of-the-range computer that will appeal to those who like to crunch plenty of data and ride structured workouts. You can personally customise up to six training pages and select from 30 different training views, and you can create a workout directly on the device in seconds. A colour screen with an intuitive smartphone-like interface should make it a breeze to use, and Sigma say they've prioritised making the Rox 12.0 easy to use and logical with big buttons and clear graphics. What's more, there are various optional coloured cases available to purchase separately so you can do some bike matching if black and white is too Plain Jane for you. Worth the cash? The full review is coming soon. 
sigmasport.com

Rapha Souplesse Mitts

£50.00

Rapha Souplesse Mitts.jpg

Fifty quid mitts better be damn good mitts, and our reviewer Tass Whitby will be hoping these ones from Rapha will justify the price tag over her test period. The latest versions have a new palm construction for better comfort and feel, say Rapha, and are recommended for warm to hot days in the saddle. The synthetic suede palm should offer plenty of cushioning, and the fabric on the back of the hand is the same used in the Souplesse Jersey, with an anti-bacterial treatment and SPF 50+ sun protection... if you've ever slapped on the suncream before a hot ride and forgot about the backs of your hands, you'll know about it!  
rapha.cc

 

To see all road.cc's latest test reports, head over to our reviews section. If you want some more advice before splashing the cash, check out our buyer's guides. 

Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story). 

Add new comment

24 comments

Avatar
matthewn5 | 5 years ago
0 likes

I was an original kickstarter supporter of the Knog Oi. It came, eventually, and it was so quiet and unobtrusive that I never fitted it. It was made in only 22.2mm and 31.8mm. They had apparently not realised until late in development that drop bars are 23.8mm diameter!

If you want to try, there are Chinese knock-offs  on a familiar auction website now for a fraction of the original cost.

Avatar
zero_trooper | 5 years ago
0 likes

Has a ‘5 cool things…’ feature ever generated so many comments?

Taxes and bells.

 

Avatar
Dingaling | 5 years ago
0 likes

If you can save your pocket money for a couple of weeks get a Spurcycle. My kids bought me one for my road bike 2 years ago and it is so effective on shared routes I bought one last month for my new bike. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
1 like

I've got a couple of the KickStarter Titanium bells and they're rubbish. The spring started rusting on one of them as well as the bell being far too quiet.

Avatar
Dingaling | 5 years ago
1 like

Never heard of carbon bearings. Should it read ceramic bearings on the Look pedals?

Avatar
keirik | 5 years ago
0 likes

Double post

Avatar
keirik | 5 years ago
2 likes

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

Avatar
Helmut D. Bate replied to keirik | 5 years ago
3 likes
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

Avatar
dgmtc replied to Helmut D. Bate | 5 years ago
1 like

Helmut D. Bate wrote:
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

Actually, the original is rubbish.
Very underwelming sound and construction.
I have owned 2 (pre-ordered them because of the hype) and one of them rattled quite badly.

I think they fixed the construction on the 'luxe' edition but still need to hear it before I consider buying it. Actually the BBB 'loud and clear deluxe' bell (5-ish quid) is the one I use on all my bikes now. Not perfect (rattles when riding over cobbles ) but it's small and loud.

 

Avatar
Helmut D. Bate replied to dgmtc | 5 years ago
0 likes
dgmtc wrote:

Helmut D. Bate wrote:
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

Actually, the original is rubbish.
Very underwelming sound and construction.
I have owned 2 (pre-ordered them because of the hype) and one of them rattled quite badly.

I think they fixed the construction on the 'luxe' edition but still need to hear it before I consider buying it. Actually the BBB 'loud and clear deluxe' bell (5-ish quid) is the one I use on all my bikes now. Not perfect (rattles when riding over cobbles ) but it's small and loud.

 

Detailed and informative. Actual thanks.

Avatar
check12 replied to dgmtc | 5 years ago
0 likes

dgmtc wrote:

Helmut D. Bate wrote:
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

Actually, the original is rubbish.
Very underwelming sound and construction.
I have owned 2 (pre-ordered them because of the hype) and one of them rattled quite badly.

I think they fixed the construction on the 'luxe' edition but still need to hear it before I consider buying it. Actually the BBB 'loud and clear deluxe' bell (5-ish quid) is the one I use on all my bikes now. Not perfect (rattles when riding over cobbles ) but it's small and loud.

 

Thanks, have bought a loud & clear from tredz on ebay, £3.42 delivered.

Avatar
check12 replied to check12 | 5 years ago
0 likes

check12 wrote:

dgmtc wrote:

Helmut D. Bate wrote:
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

Actually, the original is rubbish.
Very underwelming sound and construction.
I have owned 2 (pre-ordered them because of the hype) and one of them rattled quite badly.

I think they fixed the construction on the 'luxe' edition but still need to hear it before I consider buying it. Actually the BBB 'loud and clear deluxe' bell (5-ish quid) is the one I use on all my bikes now. Not perfect (rattles when riding over cobbles ) but it's small and loud.

 

Thanks, have bought a loud & clear from tredz on ebay, £3.42 delivered.

The loud & clear is great, good tip, thanks

Avatar
NPlus1Bikelights replied to Helmut D. Bate | 5 years ago
0 likes

Helmut D. Bate wrote:
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

Main issue with the bell is that it's great when you're not moving but cycling vibrations dampen the ring and striking it too hard in emergencies often plinks it rather than ringing true. If you strike it carefully you get a good ring but then it's not loud enough.

Rain/ severe fog killed my second bell's ring, they are sending me another, they to their credit have improved customer servce, especially towards Kickstarter backers who they seem to realise are not just customers but supporters and deserve a little more TLC.  And may support them on Kickstarter  again. 

Avatar
Helmut D. Bate replied to NPlus1Bikelights | 5 years ago
0 likes
NPlus1BikelightsNJerseys wrote:

Helmut D. Bate wrote:
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

Main issue with the bell is that it's great when you're not moving but cycling vibrations dampen the ring and striking it too hard in emergencies often plinks it rather than ringing true. If you strike it carefully you get a good ring but then it's not loud enough.

Rain/ severe fog killed my second bell's ring, they are sending me another, they to their credit have improved customer servce, especially towards Kickstarter backers who they seem to realise are not just customers but supporters and deserve a little more TLC.  And may support them on Kickstarter  again. 

Good shout... Which it seems is what you need if you have an Oi.

I did back the original run but my Oi ended up in my garage or knicked by one of my kids. Haven't ever used it. Good to hear their service is reasonable.

Avatar
keirik replied to Helmut D. Bate | 5 years ago
0 likes

Helmut D. Bate wrote:
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

 

go and buy one yourself then and find out scientifically.

what a complete bellend you must be.

Avatar
Helmut D. Bate replied to keirik | 5 years ago
1 like
keirik wrote:

Helmut D. Bate wrote:
keirik wrote:

The original is rubbish, not loud at all. Don't believe the hype

That's loads more scientific than 'hype'. Big thanks.

 

go and buy one yourself then and find out scientifically.

what a complete bellend you must be.

What a waste of Internet you actually are. And that's ScienceFact.

Avatar
ktache | 5 years ago
0 likes

Hey, I've never paid more than basic rate and I've just started using my Jones Ti H-bar, pricey, and I got them from the US, so a bit confused about the total cost.  My reasoning was that if I got the ali version and loved them, then I would have got to get the Ti ones eventually, so wasting the initial investment.  They are brilliant (very luckily).  Quality IS worth it.

They are the same weight as the alloys, but I wanted the longeivity, which is why I couldn't go for the carbon.  And maybe the damping?

And I did pick up 2 sets of grips at $20 a go, charliethebikemonger has them at £40, so saved a little bit, yeah, right.

Avatar
check12 | 5 years ago
6 likes

£50 for gloves, £35 for a bell, £360 for a pair of handlebars? “This is fine”

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to check12 | 5 years ago
4 likes

check12 wrote:

£50 for gloves, £35 for a bell, £360 for a pair of handlebars? “This is fine”

If someone is willing to pay, then yes. The sooner we get a 70% tax band, the better.

Avatar
srchar replied to don simon fbpe | 5 years ago
0 likes

don simon fbpe wrote:

The sooner we get a 70% tax band, the better.

We already have one. Parents earning between £50k-£60k lose 58% of anything above £50k to tax due to Child Benefit clawback, and NI on top takes them to 70%.

 

 

Avatar
check12 replied to srchar | 5 years ago
0 likes

srchar wrote:

don simon fbpe wrote:

The sooner we get a 70% tax band, the better.

We already have one. Parents earning between £50k-£60k lose 58% of anything above £50k to tax due to Child Benefit clawback, and NI on top takes them to 70%.

 

 

 

is that just 50-£60k, whats the tax rate at 60-70 on that method? Thanks

 

 

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to srchar | 5 years ago
0 likes
srchar wrote:

We already have one. Parents earning between £50k-£60k lose 58% of anything above £50k to tax due to Child Benefit clawback, and NI on top takes them to 70%.

 

 

If you're earning £110k+ with a good employer pension you can hit some crazy marginal rates.

100%+ for some people.

Not a very sensible system.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to srchar | 5 years ago
1 like

srchar wrote:

don simon fbpe wrote:

The sooner we get a 70% tax band, the better.

We already have one. Parents earning between £50k-£60k lose 58% of anything above £50k to tax due to Child Benefit clawback, and NI on top takes them to 70%.

 

 

So we don't have anything like a 70% tax band then.

What would 70% tax band plus NI contributions look like?

Avatar
srchar replied to don simon fbpe | 5 years ago
1 like

don simon fbpe wrote:

srchar wrote:

don simon fbpe wrote:

The sooner we get a 70% tax band, the better.

We already have one. Parents earning between £50k-£60k lose 58% of anything above £50k to tax due to Child Benefit clawback, and NI on top takes them to 70%.

So we don't have anything like a 70% tax band then.

If you're one of the 5% of employed people earning between fifty and sixty grand a year, you get to keep 30% of your last £10k of earnings, which I'd say is like a 70% tax band for those people.

don simon fbpe wrote:

What would 70% tax band plus NI contributions look like?

A 70% tax band plus NI contribs would look like an 82% tax band, which would be a purely political statement, given that history shows it would lower the overall tax take.

Latest Comments