Who could have imagined that we would ever be talking about improving braking on a road bike. Why bother? Last time I checked going slowly wasn’t the aim of the game. But it is coming, without doubt. Disc brakes on the road will be the buzz groupset development of Eurobike 2012 aka 2013 for the market. Fact.
You don’t need to look very deeply into the comments section of articles on the matter to realise this is dividing opinion and it will continue to do so. I am all for discussion but my problem with most of the negative comments is that they seem misguided or misinformed to me.
Allow me to set the record straight. Discs for the road is not just a sly way to make you buy more bikes and bicycle engineers have not run out of scope to improve the performance of framesets. We are just scraping the surface with carbon technology for the bicycle in so many ways. Stagnation on that front will not be reached for a while yet, but I can explain that another time.
Here is my take on discs…
At Eurobike this last year a lot people were surprised that there was no complete hydraulic disc solution on the market. A full 14months on from the UCI lifting the ban on disc brakes in cyclo-cross and still no solution from the big 2.5 component manufacturers [Shimano, SRAM, and Campagnolo], but from an industry view this was no surprise at all. That is because the industry as a whole is nervous of cyclo-cross. If you look to mainland Europe ‘cross is widely considered to be a sport for a) Belgians and b) Professionals. That's not a big market to aim at. Shimano’s amazing cyclo-cross developments with the CX-50/70 are a great example of how tentative the industry is towards 'cross. Two cranksets and a few front derailleurs is hardly massive investment. And that ladies and gentleman is the important word – investment.
Despite its growing popularity ‘cross will never provide the return on investment to justify the development costs. The numbers just don’t add up. If you consider the amount of money that is going to have to be invested to bring discs to the curly handlebar market in a big way, you can rest assured it is not something that will be done lightly. It will not be a fad and it will not be purely for ‘cross
What is most interesting to me is that without realising it the UCI, with its rule change, has sparked a much greater debate in the industry. What was previously an incoherent rumble going on in the background is now a mainstream topic of conversation. Would discs actually provide any advantage to a road bike? Yes. Frame manufacturers are really pushing hard to come up with a frameset in time for the known launch of the complete solution groupset. Discs are coming to the road market, and the cyclo-cross market will benefit as an aside.
With discs come many benefits, but the real advantage will not be from ultimate braking force. It will be consistent and well-modulated braking in all conditions. It will make sense to you when you ride it you just might have to stomach an initial weight penalty and a barely measureable aero disadvantage. Oh and be a little brave to try something new that you don’t like.
I feel sorry for the likes of TRP, Hope and USE that have invested in the converter solution; a good idea but too late - although all three are probably working on fully integrated solutions themselves – TRP are certainly said to be. My guess on which the manufacturer will break cover with a road disc groupset? Well, it's not a guess I know, but I'm not going to betray any trusts by saying here - it won't be long before you know and anyway it doesn’t take a genius to work it out. With the launch of EPS you are down to 2 from the initial big 2.5. So it's a groupset manufacturer beginning with 'S' that's in the market for some technical innovation.
For me the most interesting aspect of the industry's decision to embrace disc brakes on road bikes is not the technical aspects of the exercise it's simply how much power the UCI has over genuine technical development, despite only 0.001% of the world’s cycling community being directly affected by their legislation. If that ban on cyclocross discs had never existed those many millions of cyclists who have never ridden a cyclocross bike let alone raced one would have been riding road bikes with discs years ago."
Add new comment
62 comments
I bought a CX bike as a winter trainer for no other reason that it carried cable disc brakes. It's a no brainer for me. Maintenance in my opinion is easier, set it and forget it, occasionally tighten the pad clearance, renew the pads once in a blue moon. The whole bike stays cleaner without the grinding paste off the rims in the wet, thus reducing maintenance ultimately. I would put my money on disc brakes being defacto standard in 5 years.
I can see why it is happening, but they really are going to have to do something about wheel changes. On the MTB it can be a real faff, on the road bike undo QR wheel drops out bang new wheel in. On the MTB loads of faffing as the disc never slots straight into the dropouts. On the back it is worse as your fighting the rear mech at the same time.
News to me, it may be gone on the freeride/dh scene but look at XC (proper XC as in riding up and down hills from A-B) bikes and it is still definitely the majority.
A disc brake wheel is a lot faster to change in my opinion, after spending a month assembling demo MTBs and road bikes. All you do is undo the QR (and unscrew it so you can get it over the idiot-tabs) pull it down and out. Reverse the process for a fresh wheel with a fully inflated tyre. Doneburgers.
It negates the need to undo the calipers (using that lever everyone loves to forget to redo after the wheel-change, which you only remember when you need pull the lever when going way too hot into the next corner), deflate wider touring tyres, check the alignment of brake pads (ever) or worry about your carbon rims, especially when you are a Clydesdale rider like myself.
New axle standard? Will QR live on as we know it, or will we be looking at another more secure mounting?
There was long-standing debate in the MTB world over whether there was a real risk of the braking forces involved ripping the wheel from the dropouts.
The Russell Pinder case was where this came to a head, and was settled between the family and Fox (the fork manufacturers) out of court, so the official investigation and findings were never published.
But QR is all but dead in MTB circles now, on the front end at least.
Eliminating front end flex from suspension forks was a driver for the development of the through-axle systems now in place, but the safety of QR skewers with disk brakes was a hot topic for long time.
My two cents:
1. Most bikes these days has internal cable routing (Smoother lines) and would look bit weird having a front cable hanging around on the fork. Will that be a huge aerodynamic impact? I think so. I also can tell you changing an internal disc brake hose on a MTB is a PAIN!
2. Nobody is talking about the forks themselves. Will they handle the stress?
Just a couple of points - BUT I support the idea of discs. Better braking in the wet is only a good thing.
Not for me. I don't even like the way Campag have made high end groupset calliper brakes black. Black???! Just to mask some poor finish but lighter alloy.
Chrome caliper brakes will see me out. If I'm not going to ruin the looks of my beautiful bikes with black brakes I would hardly wish to sully them with some lace doily braking system.
We didn't beat Hitler with disc brakes or plastic frames - it was good honest craftsmanship and British legs honed on the roads of the mother country. Stop all this madness now!
Yours
Colonel Bibshorts (rtd)
Tunbridge Wells
As a long time mountain biker who only got my first road bike a couple of years back, I remember the discs vs rim brakes debate happening all those years ago on MTBs. Discs on even cheap mountain bikes are almost universal now.
Wheel changes - once you've done it a few times and learned the new knack, it really is just as quick as rim brakes.
Weight - look at the weight of a Shimano XTR disc vs rim brake set up and the weight difference even accounting for differing spoke lacing is negligible (plus as previously mentioned any extra grams are at the hub rather than at the rim giving handling improvements).
"feel" - the braking feel and modulation of a good hydraulic disc brake set up really is head and shoulders better than rim brakes.
Buckled rim after hitting a pothole? - this can end your ride on a rim brake bike if its a buckle of more than a few mm, on a bike with discs you'll be far more likely to get home even if the buckle's bad.
A big advantage for MTBs which is less of a factor for road bikes but may still count, is the fact that your braking surface on a rim brake is right down close to the ground constantly in contact with mud/puddles/grit whereas on a disc the braking surface is at the hub nice and high away from the ground. Less cack on your braking surface means better braking and less wear.
Personally I can see hydraulic discs becoming the norm over the next few years on higher end road bikes and gradually trickling down through the range.
Wholeheartedly agree with this. There's also the added benefit of rims not overheating, melting glue and rolling tyres on long alpine descents.
Or one who's told to use them by the team being paid/sponsored by the relevant equipment manufacturer
Thats also true to a point, BUT unlike other sports, forgive me if i'm wrong, the WHOLE team bike wise ride the same of everything?
They get individuality on their shoes, eye wear and sometimes helmets??
So if a whole team approached their sponsor or manager and said, "Look, we're not really happy about riding disc's" i think they would be told ok, stick to what we know best??
Worries about maintenance? I hadn't seen that angle. Still, it will be a boon for MTB trained mechanics, who have been working on these things for years.
APF
Excellent point. is there a point here also with Magura signing up with the new Garmin team? Shape of new Cervelo things to come?
Would there be a significant weight penalty in making the wheels strong enough to cope with the extra forces that disk brakes would cause? I.e. A radially laced wheel would just fold under heavy braking
difficult to say for sure, there's a lot of factors:
1) cross lacing will need to be used, so longer spokes = heavier wheel
2) rim doesn't have to be built to withstand brake wear = lighter wheel
3) rotor needed + mounting points for it = heavier wheel
on balance i reckon wheels would have to be slightly heavier, but most of the extra weight is at the hub and the rim could be lighter, so in terms of rotational inertia there's not likely to be much in it
But they just *will* be too heavy. Compared to a real lightweight road racer.
I've been riding a Genesis Croix de Fer as a commute bike for a couple of years. OK, it's steel, has a pannier rack on etc. But the cable operated discs weigh a bloody ton!
And then there's the maintenance. I would NOT try maintaining those things! You need to be a friggin' watchmaker! The travel distance of the pads is about 0.5mm They get sticky so easily, and upon adjustment using the *teeny, tiny, strippable allen key hole*, begin to rub very easily.
A solution without a problem for road riding I'm afraid.
they won't be mechanical discs, they'll be hydraulic discs, which weigh a great deal less and self-centre
And for pros, I don't think the weight is an issue - pro bikes can easily be well under the current weight limit. Neither is the maintenance. There is a real problem with crappy braking on carbon rims (see Geraint coming off the road descending in this year's Tour), so - wheel-change issues aside - they will be welcomed I think? And where the pros go, the high-end market will follow.
Depends on what you class as a real lightweight
My new bike with disc's will weight in around the 6.6kg mark, fully carbon
So I just went to look on Evans for a similar spec bike and their weight, is 7.08kg thats without disc's
Even a BMC team bike is around 6.4kg
My wheels are quoted around 1,460 - 1,490 gm set
and that's presumably with mechanical discs, which are heavier than the new hydraulic road discs will be
Add non-road specific hubs, we'd expect some wegiht savings vs mtn/cross hubs there too in the future
Yeah, Avid BB7 mechanical disc's, so it would be lighter with the hydraulic ones
Not a problem at all for pro's, i just don't see them changing for a long time, it will be the younger riders who start out now, long before they even hit pro stage with a bike bought by parents and then go on to become pro's who will start using them, i think
OR a rider who switches from cross to road
How will this affect quick wheel changes in racing? I'm a complete ignoramus when it comes to discs, but it'll slow things down considerably, no? Surely losing larger amounts of time when puncturing is not something pros will be keen on doing.
Far easier fixing a puncture on my MTB than my road/cross bike - just undo the QR & the wheel drops out and slots straight back in again. No need to faff around unhooking the brake cable or trying to shove the wheel back in before inflating the tyre.
Changing the pads is a lot less hassle than setting up rim brakes too. Force back the pistons, take the old pads out, shove the new ones in and bolt back onto your bike. It may take a couple of goes to get them lined up true, but it involves a lot less swearing than getting rim brakes aligned. The only real pain is changing/bleeding the brake fluid, but you don't do that very often and the dog soon learns that DOT4 fluid doesn't taste nice.
Oh and it feels lovely when you pull the brake lever with one finger and your bike actually stops, whereas when I'm commmuting down Cromford Hill on my Cross Bike I'm not sure I really have the power to stop dead if I need it.
I have a Croix de Fer with front and rear discs and I've found its actually easier to change the wheel... you don't have to fiddle with the brake thingy to get the tyre past the blocks. The disc just slots straight back into the caliper easy peasy. And I'm no pro mechanic by any means!
Just shows how you can be fooled by how it looks. I'd say try them before making judgements.
Personally, I think they're great (and mine are merely cable operated) but then I'm not obsessed about the extra gram or two in weight - I think it'd be just as easy for me to lose the difference by eating less cake!
Oh, and I'm only using it for clubruns and Audax events
About time too i reckon. Better braking can never be a bad thing. It'll make slowing from 40+ mph so much more predictable especially through the winter months. I'm all for it
Maybe a Sram/Magura offering? It would make sense given the recent Magura teaser with the Red coloured graphics.
Very interesting.
Yup, exciting in terms of wheel development and braking performance, though the aesthetic angle will be hard as brake callipers have pretty much remained unchanged in terms of looks for a century or so.
Can't wait to see what comes forward from manufacturers.
Personally I think the actual rotors have a rather pleasing aesthetic simplicity, but it's true that the calipers often look a bit ugly. But then the MTB design aesthetic is (largely) different from road, perhaps a bit more functional than swoopy if you see what I mean. When the road 'look' is applied it'll be interesting to see what comes out, as you say.
As for actually braking, can only be a good thing as far as I'm concerned- more modulation, less weather dependent, no rim wear, weight neither here nor there (for practical purposes.) What's not to like? Well, apart from cost...
I'm waiting on my new road bike with disc brakes, shipping with someone as we speak from America
Pages