Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

OPINION

It’s not all about racing: why the bike industry needs to take a chill pill

Avatar
In this opinion piece, Steve Thomas ponders: “Why is it that so much of the cycling world seems to assume it’s all about performance enhancement and racing?”

It wasn’t the first time that the bike shop owner had tried to sell me some super expensive and very blingy piece of kit… but this time I did wonder if she was taking the proverbial.

> Steve Thomas: How getting a Raleigh for Christmas changed my life

A carbon fibre stem, of all things. I mean, why the heck would I want to spend a ludicrous amount on money on a piece of kit that would save me a few grams, and one that would also have me worrying with every jolt in the road? I looked down at my mid-life lifebelt and just smiled politely as I declined the offer! All of this was going on as I was waiting for the mechanic to add on an adaptor to my rear gear hanger, so that I could use a mountain bike cassette with a 42-tooth bottom cog.

> Suffering on the hills? Find out how to get lower gears to make climbing easier

For me this is the bare minimum for gravel riding in a hilly area, especially when ridden by my current self. The adaptor was the only workaround that I could find to counter a very badly specced/designed gravel bike. It had what I’d describe as cyclocross race geometry and gearing.

At the same time a friend of the mechanic walked past and scoffed at my dinnerplate-sized cassette, duly muttering: “Huh, walking speed.”

Steve Thomas it's not all about racing ride shot 2 - credit SteveThomasPix
Image: Steve Thomas

What is it with so many cyclists, the cycling media, the bike industry, and even some outsiders looking in; why do so many seem to think cycling is just about racing and performance?

When I took up cycling, as a “soon to be teenager” of the late 1970’s, it was all about escapism and adventure for me. Yes, I did reluctantly (at the time) get lured down on to the drops, and followed my own racing dream all around the world for many years.

Even so, I was never of the belief that cycling was all about racing, which perhaps enabled me to see other sides of cycling and enjoy them more.

Having spent the last 30 or so years also writing about and taking pictures of all things cycling, sadly it seems that the issue about it all being about racing is still there; maybe even more so than before.

Sure enough I do tune in to watch the carnage of Paris-Roubaix and the mountain battles of the Tour de France; although I wouldn’t break into a cold sweat to watch a full-length flat Tour stage. I would actually much prefer to watch some obscure guy’s YouTube video about riding on flat pedals while accompanied by stray dogs on a year-long adventure through the Andes.

Even the cycling media seems to have a huge divide within it. There is a very clear disconnect between race media and those of us who write about all other things cycling; and also there seems to be a complete lack of acceptance from the racing media side towards anything else.

Steve Thomas it's not all about racing ride shot 1 - credit SteveThomasPix
Image: Steve Thomas

They simply do not get the fact that cycling is not all about racing, and that not everybody who rides a bike wants to go faster or worships a disposable carbon race bike that cost them half a year’s wages, let alone sanctifies those who do ride them faster than the rest. The fact is that very few cyclists ever race, or even have a desire to, and yet for some reason even the mainstream cycling ‘world’ seems to have a very outdated acceptance issue towards this blatant fact.

There is a total lack of relevance between professional racing and the kinds of cycling that most of us actually do, not to mention our reason for riding bikes. Major brands seem to be obsessed with cutting edge performance, and I guess selling £8,000 bikes does make some commercial sense to them; although when you see these fragile things crumple at the first hint of a crash, it does make you question their thinking.

 > 8 smart bike upgrades for under £100 — get comfier, go faster, climb easier

In my opinion there’s far more comfort and fun to be had on a good old steel framed bike with wired gear shifting, and it will last you for years, or perhaps has already has done so.

Even when some pro teams and brands do get down to dabbling in other forms of cycling, there seems to be an elitist, tongue-in-cheek nonsensical tone about it. Of course, there is always the old Formula 1 theory that this is where the technological development comes from, and from where it then trickles down to us. I’ve never quite bought into that theory.

There’s far more to be learned from someone like Lachlan Morton and his exploits than there is from some tantrum-throwing prima donna who refuses to ride disc brakes, and there’s far more of a genuine connection to regular cyclists in there too. Of course this doesn’t need to impact you or your riding experience, although unfortunately it does very much colour the general marketplace, as in the bikes and equipment choices available out there. 

Steve Thomas it's not all about racing ride shot 4 - credit SteveThomasPix
Image: Steve Thomas

Luckily, there are many brands out there now who do cater more for the rest of us; even if, unfortunately, some of them have also become somewhat elitist and artisan with that. Trendy and overpriced, essentially.

It really saddens me to think back to all of the highly skilled and experienced frame builders of 30-plus years ago. They were mostly true cyclists and craftsmen who were dedicated to their jigs, many were just about scraping by financially. Most of them were also forced out of business by mass production. If only they’d have been around now, perhaps custom frames would something that we could all afford rather than the boldly painted bank-breakers we’re now so used to seeing.  

> The best handbuilt frames — 25 makers who can craft your dream frame

It’s also quite telling that so many top pro riders actually go out and buy or get hold of custom steel bikes the minute they stop racing for a living, and then go out and ride them much as we do. 

Add new comment

19 comments

Avatar
imajez | 3 years ago
1 like

A lot of anecdotes presented as data and I can simply negate most with my equally meaningless anecdote...in all the years I've been in bike shops, I've never had anyone trying and upsell some me some racing bling or had staff make snide rmarks about my various bikes.  
Regardless of all that, just about all bike progres has come from racing. It's where making a better widget or bike can make a big difference. This trickles down to the rest of us in a multitude of way, even if we never race. My girlfriends bike cost less than a grand and weighs less than a pro's bike did when I was a kid. More comfortable and faster too.
Both MTBing and Gravel bikes only exist because these bikes emerged directly from folk racing bikes. MTB and traithlon races are also what drove so much of the innovations we have seen in bike tech in last few decades and more recently gravel and bikepacking/endurance racing. Road racing rules were there mostly to prevent innovation. My first proper road bike as a kid was pretty much the same as my mate's 40 year old road bike that his dad/grandpa originally had, and then passed down. Thank god folk racing bikes in other ways changed bikes for the better, so we all benefited and now have much much nicer bikes as a result. 
 

Avatar
tramontane34 | 3 years ago
0 likes

As a cyclist starting with a club in 1982 , even then like life in general, it was a very broad church.

Many cyclists are absorbed by performance powered by their egos and place great value on metrics power, speed,strava etc .This I think is largely down to societies  love for the 'corporatisation' ie measurement of anything for it to be worthy of comparison and validation of self.

Quantifiable metrics ie stiffness, aero,  weight, race plamares enables manufacturers to have, what might be considered by some to unveil the Emperor's new clothes every year in the form of the latest and greatest must have.

Its a personal choice of the individual to chose what to enjoy: wanderlust and escapisim or bragging over Strava stats as long as you enjoy what you do and are not overly attached to the outcome all is good.

 

Avatar
Smoggysteve | 3 years ago
2 likes

I don't agree with the premise of this article. The belief that everyday cyclists are buying ridiculously expensive bikes, wheels, stems, bottle cages, ad nausium isnt about racing. This sort of thing never happened 20 years ago to the same degree yet racing was just as big then as it is today. The driving force is all down to that funky little app called STRAVA!

The average rider knows hes never going to be as good as a pro and no amount of upgrades is going to get them anwhere close to that level, but will it help them get that KOM or push their average speed up past 20mph? thats your contributing factor for the rise and rise of the performance bike industry. its not about being Froome or Pogacar. its about beating that guy who rides your route 5 seconds faster than you grrr. 

Avatar
Ihatecheese | 3 years ago
0 likes

Great article. I find it frustratingly daunting to walk into some bike shops in London due to the perception that I'm not pro enough to ride the bike I own.

I love bikes, ride to stay fit and as I don't own a car I spend some money riding bikes that makes me smile as I ride. I have SPDs rather than road bike pedals, whilst I hate Lycra.

The bike brands can really irk some.
Turn up to a shop on my Surly LHT and everyone thinks it's cool. S works tarmac? Not so much... It's just one of those things but always disappointing. I just wanna chat about bikes and get stuff fixed when it's beyond my skill set or toolbox!

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Ihatecheese | 3 years ago
0 likes

Ihatecheese wrote:

Great article. I find it frustratingly daunting to walk into some bike shops in London due to the perception that I'm not pro enough to ride the bike I own.

I love bikes, ride to stay fit and as I don't own a car I spend some money riding bikes that makes me smile as I ride. I have SPDs rather than road bike pedals, whilst I hate Lycra.

Went into Evans Cycles in East Dulwich the other week to buy a couple of 26" inner tubes for my MTB. Wearing full race kit, pushing my full carbon Ultegra Di2 road bike; guy at the counter, "They're not for that are they? Because they won't fit that, you know."

Then they wonder why people go online...

Avatar
Simon E | 3 years ago
2 likes

There are many brands, media outlets and even some shops more than happy to reinforce the connection between pro racing success and everyday riding. It's marketing, the 'Win on Sunday, sell on Monday' concept. We are all easily persuaded that we should purchase items we don't need but there no need to get hot under the collar about it.  If someone buys a fancy bike with blingy carbon and 12-speed wireless shifting it has no impact on me, I simply hope they enjoy it.

Using the term "prima donna" suggests that you view professional cyclists - who ride their bikes very fast for a living and may have very specific requirements - with the same disdain as the mechanic who slighted your cassette choice. But Lachlan Morton is a pro cyclist riding for a WorldTour team, he's just doing things a little differently to other professionals. Is it therefore more admirable? Can people relate more to his mind-blowing ride around France than the riders in the Tour? Or is it more that we just open-mouthed at the ridiculous distance and elevation he rode while wearing sandals?

Watching pro racing or taking part in competition yourself is fine. I do both. But that doesn't necessarily give me a blinkered view of what cycling should be. I wear lycra but I also ride into town in a t-shirt and jeans and am always happy to see anyone cycling, regardless of their speed, the distance or the number of gears they use. Is there not room for both?

Regarding frame builders, the dwindling numbers is more to do with the quality and cost of mass production in the Far East. Many skill-based industries have gone the same way. However, there has been a resurgence in frame building, as events like  Bespoked demonstrate but if custom builders were creating inexpensive bikes for pottering around they'd disappear just like their predecessors.

 

Edit: after posting the above I sat down with the latest copy of Cycling UK's magazine. 74 pages showing lots of 'normal' cycling and almost entirely devoid of lycra. Reviews of inexpensive folding bikes and the Oxford Bike Works 1E (£1,299 and the steel frame is made in Coventry). Perhaps get your news, reviews etc from sources less enamoured with racing and bling components. I think road.cc does quite well in this regard, though they can only review items they are sent.

Avatar
fixit | 3 years ago
0 likes

It is not at all about racing..

Avatar
welshcyclist | 3 years ago
3 likes

I agree with you Steve, riding a bike is, for most, about getting out and about and getting from A to B. Simply, it is the joy of pedalling along in the fresh air and taking in everything around, and enjoying that freedom that only a bike can provide. My biggest bug bear is that cycle clothing is always too small a size for me, a short, thick waisted, broad shouldered welshcyclist. To get the right waist measurement I should be 6 feet 6 inches, while I am 5 feet 7 inches. I suppose it's similar to the haute couture of fashion, nothing to do with ordinary people. ( I hate that phrase, there are no such thing as ordinary people ). Still we can talk till we are blue in the face, it seems nothing is led by what the public want, let alone what the ordinary biking public want. Cheers.

Avatar
Dingaling replied to welshcyclist | 3 years ago
1 like

You made me laugh. I'm not overweight, just a foot too short. We must be about the same size and shape. I gave up buying cycling jerseys long ago because they continue to advertise them on models with a physique that I had when I was about 16. It is a good job lycra bib shorts are really stretchy otherwise I would, according to makers size charts, need XXL instead of M and then they would be half way down my calves.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
5 likes

Genuinely of all the many shops I've been to in the last 9 years in and around London (mostly chain shops but also a few indys)...not a single one has assumed I'd be interested in something racy and tried to upsell me.

The absolute fuckers!!!

 

Avatar
jaymack | 3 years ago
0 likes

Exploration not persperation and on a Litespeed Appalachian to boot, what's not to like?

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
5 likes

Grant (Rivendell) Petersen wrote a whole book espousing the philosophy of being an Unracer and actively avoiding racing's influence on cycling-in-general.

Avatar
JonSP | 3 years ago
1 like

Lots to agree with here... but I don't think you'll find Lachlan Morton is riding on 'a good old steel framed bike with wired gear shifting'. Wired gears, maybe, steel frame, definitely not
I haven't raced for donkey's years and I'm very much at the pootling around level these days, but still riding stuff that's tricky enough that I'm more than happy to have disc brakes, tubeless tyres, and (on my mountain bike at least) a dropper post - all innovations that weren't around when I started. On the gravel bike I'm also 100% happy to be on carbon frame and wheels; they haven't batted an eyelid at some pretty rough stuff, including a flight of stone steps on my last outing. And if it does come to hike-a-bike or hoicking it over a locked gate; then again I love carbon.
I'm sure there's some rebalancing needed in media coverage (I hate to see people kicking up sprays of dirt on every bend; you're not at Rampage today, matey) but competition has been a major driver behind all these innovations. 

Avatar
Hirsute | 3 years ago
1 like

Where is that bridge ?

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
4 likes
Avatar
Keith57 replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
2 likes

Definately Barmouth. Riden over it from home (Llanberis) about 3 times. Quite nice!

Avatar
Captain Badger | 3 years ago
1 like

Fantastic piece, one that I found really struck a note with me. Have just spent a reasonable amount of money on a steelie MTB. Not for performance, but cos I love it.

I used to hit all sports with the must-win mentality - only leads to disappointment and frustration, and many sports just don't need to be competitive to be rewarding - cycling, running, fell running, wild swimming for example are beautiful things to do of themselves, made more beautiful still without a stopwatch or heart monitor. Do it with a friend and that beauty is achieved and appreciated collaboratively, which again makes things much more fun. Your body will tell you whether you're putting enough effort in.

Obvs, those that enjoy competing can/will/should compete. It's interesting though as the OP says, that the market seems tailored for that end disproportionately

Avatar
italianbikesnob | 3 years ago
8 likes

This is a really big subject Steve, and one I have always wondered about myself. I agree the marketing aspect is a big contributor but we are also complicit in the whole merry dance and this is perhaps where it gets a little difficult to be objective. I think all cyclists are (even a little bit) competitive by nature. Even if they're not born that way, stick them on a bike and they suddenly want to beat whoever happens to be nearby. Three decades of commuting by bike in London has shown this to be true. I don't get people 'race walking' past me giving me a sideways glance daring me to try and catch them by walking faster. But they do on a bike. Why is that I wonder? It's as if we cyclists all have a monkey on our back that we simply can't shake off.

And I'm just as bad. My racing days ended a couple of decades ago (apart from sportives which I refuse to call races) but I am still racing in my head, myself mostly, where I am my own biggest competitor. And that mindset (which I believe is common among cyclists) is ripe for being used against me by all the 'stiffness this, aero that' marketing claims in trying to sell me kit that would make a negligable difference to my performance but a huge dent in my wallet. Trying to keep on top of the ever improving equipment choices is like taking part in an arms race that you can never win. It's frankly a bit ridiculous if you believe that the bike makes THAT much of a difference.

So I'm lucky then that I love riding steel frames for the superb ride quality (with modern gearing it's like riding a modern bike). I also have over 20 bikes (luckily my wife doesn't read road.cc)  and none are carbon. I choose to spend money that could make me faster on bikes that are somewhat like classic cars. A bit slower perhaps but infinitely cooler. But that's a whole other story.

Avatar
richliv replied to italianbikesnob | 2 years ago
0 likes

+1 to this. I'm competitive with or without Strava and will find some way to compete even though I don't race bikes IRL (I do on Zwift and enjoy it in spite of my talent gap :-).

Probably unlike most posters, there was a 35 year gap between my Raleigh Tomahawk being too small at age 12 in 1976, and my first road bike in 2011. I did try a mates in 1977 and thought it was the most uncomfortable way to travel, ever. Sliding doors moment.. but in spite of enjoying all the things Steve Thomas says it's not about, I now love getting on 2 wheels for a whizz round the country side with mates on a Sunday. My mental health tonic too over the last 18 months.

Latest Comments