Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

feature

Staff Bikes: Can Dave's Lauf Úthald make a monster 600km ride good fun?

road.cc co-founder Dave has a new ultra-endurance challenge... or more precisely, some unfinished business. Let's take a tour around the bike he's chosen to (attempt to) complete it on

How far would you ride for fun? road.cc co-founder Dave Atkinson appears to have forgotten the amount of fun he had last time at the 600km Bryan Chapman Memorial audax across Wales and back, and is attempting it again in 2024. This year he’s opted to do it on the new Lauf Úthald endurance road bike, which he recently reviewed on the site and really rated. Let’s have a look around the bike and the kit he’ll be using on the ride.

The bike: Lauf Úthald Weekend Warrior Wireless

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - decal.jpg

This is the lowest spec model in the Úthald range, and Dave’s bike comes in the rather stunning Borealis iridescent matte finish. The eagle-eyed among you will have noticed that it’s not the red bike he reviewed, so why the swap? Well, a couple of reasons.

“When I reviewed the bike I really wanted to ride it on the BCM, and I was playing with the fit at the front, making it a bit longer and taller”, explains Dave.

“Then I realised I was basically just making the large test bike into an XL. At 189cm I’m exactly between sizes, and the XL bike is the one I’d choose for longer riding. It’s a bit more of an upright position for me, and it’s perfect for smashing out the miles.

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - full bike 2.jpg

"Since I was swapping the bike I also went for the lower-spec build rather than the Race Wireless that I reviewed, as it comes as stock with a shallower wheelset and I just prefer that on long rides.”

The bike itself is designed as a fast-but-comfortable bike – Úthald is Icelandic for “Endurance” – and it has an interesting geometry that’s quite short at the back, but paired with a more relaxed head angle at the front.

When he reviewed it, Dave praised the Úthald as a “fast, comfortable and well-specced road bike with a relaxed and assured ride”. It also made it into our road.cc Recommends section. 

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - iceland decal.jpg

It’s designed for comfort, with lowered seat stays at the back to allow the seatpost and seat tube to flex. Lauf’s Smoothie bars at the front have glass-fibre inserts that flex more than carbon to take the sting out of harsh surfaces.

You might be surprised to see that not many components have been switched out from the stock build: “I’m running the bike almost completely stock”, says Dave.

“The only thing I’ve changed is the Fizik Aliante saddle, which is fine but not a favourite of mine. I’ve swapped it for the Kranx Base 145 that I reviewed, which is cheap as chips but I really get on with it."

Groupset: SRAM Rival AXS

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - cranks.jpg

All of Lauf’s bikes are designed to be wireless-only, and the Rival AXS wireless groupset was the lowest tier until recently, when the excellent Apex AXS arrived on the scene. That’s currently only available as a 1x groupset though; here you’re getting a 48/35 crankset at the front and a 10-36 cassette, for a low gear that’s just under 1:1.

Low enough for 40 hours around Wales? Probably, thinks Dave.

“SRAM also does a 46/33 option, and if it was up to me I’d probably have that, as I’m much more likely to run out of gears going slowly than to spin out going quick, but I’m sure it’ll be fine."

Famous last words?

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - rear mech.jpg

SRAM Rival comes with a power meter as standard, a single-sided one as opposed to the double-sided one on the higher-tier Úthald models. It’s great to see power meters coming as standard equipment this far down bike ranges, but is it something that Dave will actually use?

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - power.jpg

It turns out he will:

"I find it really useful", says Dave.

"I have my Hammerhead set to auto-lap every hour, and then I have lap average power as one of the fields on my second data screen. That gives me some idea of how hard I’ve been going. 

"Hopefully, with that information available I won’t go much too hard at the start and then blow up halfway through, like last time.”

Although, that would probably make for a pretty interesting video…

Wheels and tyres: DT Swiss/Maxxis

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - wheel and tyre.jpg

We’ve already touched on the fact that Dave’s opted for the cheaper build with shallower wheels, which are DT Swiss E1800s that should be solid and dependable.

The Maxxis High Road 32mm tyres offer good levels of grip in the wet and the dry, and the big air chamber means you can run them pretty soft for extra comfort without them feeling vague.

“I’ve only got about 45psi in the front and 48psi in the rear, and I’m a big lad”, says Dave.

“That’s enough for them to roll efficiently but take the sting out of the very varied surfaces we get round here.”

Pedals: Shimano PD-M520

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - pedal.jpg

Since we made the video, Dave has relented and fitted a newer pair of pedals to the bike that aren’t all rusty, but they’re the same ones: Shimano’s lowest-spec double-sided SPD pedals.

Why not something flashier?

“The PD-M520 is unbeatable as an Audax pedal: it’s easy to get into and basically indestructible”, says Dave.

“You can save a bit of weight going further up the range, but it’s not really worth the extra spend for me.

"I have PD-M520s that are 20 years old and still going strong. I don’t miss the extra platform of a road pedal, especially using Shimano XC5 shoes which are more or less the perfect balance of stiffness for pedalling, comfort and off-bike walkability. That’s been my go-to setup for some time now.”

Aero bars: a Deda/Oval mash-up

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - aero bars.jpg

Aero extensions are increasingly common on longer-distance bikes. Obviously, if you’re racing at the pointy end of the Transcontinental Race then an aero position could save you hours and hours, but that’s not really the reason many audaxers fit them, says Dave.

“They’re not really there for the aero benefit, although I’m sure there will be times when I’ll be glad of them when punching into a headwind for hours at a stretch.

"Mostly it’s just another hand position: you tend to get numb hands after a while on an audax and the aero bars allow you to take the weight off your hands completely and give them a rest. They’re great for that.

"I’ve added some risers to make the position less aggressive and easier to hold. It’s less aero that way but I’m likely to use it more.”

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - aero bar sticker.jpg

That sticker is just there to remind Dave to do things when he stops (he's getting on a bit). 

Mudguards: SKS Raceblade Pro XL

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - mudguard.jpg

“The Úthald is such a versatile bike that it’s a shame it can’t take full mudguards, but the Raceblade Pro XLs are the next best thing”, says Dave.

“They’re about the longest quick-release mudguards you can get. The back could be longer, I’ve added a longer flap to get it below the axle which you want when riding in the rain, it’s a bit of a hack though so I might invest in a proper one.

"Hopefully, the weather will be banging and I won’t need them anyway, in which case it’s super easy to remove them.”

Bags: Ortlieb QR seatpack and Zéfal frame bag

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - full bike.jpg

On a 600km ride, you obviously need to carry some stuff, although the Bryan Chapman has a drop-bag system so you can get a change of clothes and anything else you want ferried out to the sleep stop. Dave has opted for a frame bag and a backpacking-style seatpack for enough luggage capacity on the ride.

“Mostly it’s just spares, tools, food and the odd bit of clothing”, says Dave.

“I tend to take an insulated jacket to wear off the bike, and a down jacket if it’s going to be dry as it packs up smaller. Then there’s extra layers, or more likely space for them as I’ll be wearing most of my kit at 6am when I set off!

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - seatpack.jpg

"I carry a full toolkit, and although I run the tyres tubeless, I carry two inner tubes and a puncture repair kit as well as a Dart tool to fix tubeless holes. That way I know I can always patch up and keep going. I carry a lightweight spare tyre too, just in case.”

The Ortlieb bag is a bikepacking-style affair, but with a significant difference: it attaches to the saddle rails with a quick-release plate, which makes it easy to get on and off and also means that it doesn’t sway like some seatpacks do.

“I really like it”, says Dave.

“It’s a bit heavier than some but I’ll take that hit for the performance and the convenience of getting it on and off. Often I’ll use a Tailfin on long rides, but I don’t really need the capacity on this one because of the drop bag”.

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - frame bag.jpg

The Zéfal frame bag is a bit of a surprise: Didn’t you give it a less-than-glowing review last year, Dave?

“I did, but that was specifically because it had a pretty major design flaw where the exposed edges at the top of the bag rubbed your legs raw after a while.

“It’s easily fixed though, just a bit of insulating tape along the seam and it’s fine. Once you’ve done that it’s a great bag, but you shouldn’t really need to hack stuff out of the box to make it work.

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - osmo.jpg

"I use the frame bag mostly for snacks and electronics. I’m filming the ride so my DJI Osmo Action 4 will be in there as well as my OneOdio over-the-ear headphones that’ll definitely be coming out later in the ride to take my mind off all the bits that are hurting."

Lights: Ravemen/Magene/Lezyne

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - rear light.jpg

Dave’s sporting three lights, two at the back and one at the front. The main rear light is a Lezyne Zecto Drive which is attached to the seatpack: “It’s a really great light. It’s nice and bright and it runs for ages". says Dave. 

"On an audax, and especially after dark, it’s courtesy to use a static light rather than a blinking one, and the Zecto Drive has a static mode that’ll run for about a day, so easily enough to get through the night. I’ve got a set, with the front light too, and I’ll take that as well.

"It’s mainly going to be as a light to film with after dark but also I know I have a spare if my main front light dies for some reason.”

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - front light.jpg

Talking of the front light, that’s a Ravemen LR1600, which Dave reviewed back in 2022 and has been using ever since.

“Hands down this is my favourite front light right now”, he says.

“It’s small, it runs for ages, and it’s well built. The beam is a nice squared-off shape that puts most of the light on the road but there’s also enough spill for lighting up road signs after dark. Also, it’s symmetrical so you can flip it and run it under the bars. And if it does run out of juice (it won’t on the BCM, guaranteed) you can run it from an external battery pack. It’s great."

Lauf Úthald BCM Bike check - radar.jpg

The other light is a Magene L508 radar. “I like running a radar, especially on a long ride like the BCM where I’m likely to be listening to music for big stretches”, says Dave.

“It doesn’t replace looking over your shoulder but for a lot of riding it’s a big help, and it picks up cars often before you’ve either heard or seen them.”

Let us know what you think of Dave's BCM bike choice in the comments section below, or if you're feeling really nice then wish him some luck. He'll need it!

Find out more about the Lauf Úthald endurance road bike here

Jamie has been riding bikes since a tender age but really caught the bug for racing and reviewing whilst studying towards a master's in Mechanical engineering at Swansea University. Having graduated, he decided he really quite liked working with bikes and is now a full-time addition to the road.cc team. When not writing about tech news or working on the Youtube channel, you can still find him racing local crits trying to cling on to his cat 2 licence...and missing every break going...

Add new comment

23 comments

Avatar
cqexbesd | 7 months ago
0 likes

Somethings gone wrong with most of the links. They are surrounded by brackets and are missing the colon.

Avatar
Ianbb | 7 months ago
1 like

Good luck Dave. May well see you there. Hopefully the weather will be like it is this week!

Avatar
wycombewheeler | 7 months ago
0 likes

Quote:

..1x groupset though; here you’re getting a 48/35 crankset at the front and a 10-36 cassette

what?

Avatar
Simon Withers replied to wycombewheeler | 7 months ago
0 likes

SRAM Apex AXS is only available in 1x at present.

Dave's bike has a SRAM Rival 48/35 two-ring chainset. 

Avatar
jaymack | 7 months ago
2 likes

600km of increasing misery often lead to a deep well of wonderful memories. Strange but true.

Avatar
cyclisto | 7 months ago
2 likes

Great bike but at XL it just looks horrible. The industry needs to solve this problem.

Avatar
a1white replied to cyclisto | 7 months ago
0 likes

How? bigger wheels?

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to a1white | 7 months ago
2 likes

Potentially - WTB/Moots had that demo "750d" bike/wheels a while back, and looking more proportional on larger frames was one of the benefits touted. 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to a1white | 7 months ago
1 like
Avatar
cyclisto replied to a1white | 7 months ago
1 like

I would like to see bigger wheels. It is weird that in the world of super custom frame sizes and ridiculously expensive bicycles and parts, there is no room for a slightly larger wheel size for taller riders, when MTB riders enjoy 3 different wheel sizes.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to cyclisto | 7 months ago
0 likes

cyclisto wrote:

I would like to see bigger wheels. It is weird that in the world of super custom frame sizes and ridiculously expensive bicycles and parts, there is no room for a slightly larger wheel size for taller riders, when MTB riders enjoy 3 different wheel sizes.

Larger wheels have a few issues. Firstly, as they're uncommon, there's far less choice of rims and tyres. Larger wheels are going to be heavier and have more inertia which will affect handling a bit (more stable, less nimble) and they're also less aerodynamic although I'd imagine that's going to be quite a small difference.

Apparently, bigger wheels don't roll noticeably quicker on roads, although they do show an advantage for MTB riding: https://www.renehersecycles.com/myth-17-bigger-wheels-roll-faster-amended/

Avatar
cyclisto replied to hawkinspeter | 7 months ago
0 likes

I also hate more and more standards, that push prices up and make bicycles harder to maintain in the future.

But I cannot understand how a 1.60cm woman can ride the same wheel size as a 2.00cm guy. Why do toddlers enjoy 3-4 different wheel sizes while road cycling adults just one?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to cyclisto | 7 months ago
0 likes

cyclisto wrote:

I also hate more and more standards, that push prices up and make bicycles harder to maintain in the future.

But I cannot understand how a 1.60cm woman can ride the same wheel size as a 2.00cm guy. Why do toddlers enjoy 3-4 different wheel sizes while road cycling adults just one?

I think it's mainly economics. It's hardly worth manufacturers trying to source smaller wheels for the smallest sizes as that'll make those sizes more expensive and disgruntled customers ("why should I pay more just because I'm short") will just choose a different brand with the 700c wheels.  With toddlers, all their bikes use smaller wheels so you don't get the same economics of scale coming into play.

Avatar
cyclisto replied to hawkinspeter | 7 months ago
0 likes

For small riders, I believe 28 wheels would be faster than 26, otherwise we would see them on pro racers, especially when 26 exist on such cheap kids road bikes like this decathlon 26 inch road bike that is up to 150cm height.

So 28 must be the right size for 1.60. But then similarly there should be bigger wheel sizes for bigger riders, that the industry doesn't offer yet appart from a few very special manufacturers.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to cyclisto | 7 months ago
0 likes

cyclisto wrote:

For small riders, I believe 28 wheels would be faster than 26, otherwise we would see them on pro racers, especially when 26 exist on such cheap kids road bikes like this decathlon 26 inch road bike that is up to 150cm height.

So 28 must be the right size for 1.60. But then similarly there should be bigger wheel sizes for bigger riders, that the industry doesn't offer yet appart from a few very special manufacturers.

I don't follow you - why would 28" wheels be faster than 26"?

As I see it, the main advantage of bigger wheels is dealing with potholes, but that comes at the price of heavier weight and worse aerodynamics.

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to hawkinspeter | 7 months ago
0 likes

As per the Rene Herse article you linked, it is commonly stated that larger wheels do roll faster. Rene Herse claim that is a myth, but it is nonetheless a common assertion - see e.g. https://off.road.cc/content/feature/which-is-faster-700c-or-650b-gravel-...

Avatar
cyclisto replied to hawkinspeter | 7 months ago
2 likes

If 26" were faster, then we would see 26" in TdF etc. But we don't, even for the small frames, that have some challenges.

I believe slightly larger wheels would have benefits for bigger riders. But to be honest such big frames with small wheels look ugly. And a beautiful bike is a fast bike!

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to cyclisto | 7 months ago
0 likes

cyclisto wrote:

If 26" were faster, then we would see 26" in TdF etc. But we don't, even for the small frames, that have some challenges.

I believe slightly larger wheels would have benefits for bigger riders. But to be honest such big frames with small wheels look ugly. And a beautiful bike is a fast bike!

Good point - I want to see a speed test between different wheel sizes now

Avatar
JOHN5880 replied to cyclisto | 7 months ago
1 like

And I find smaller sized bikes to look silly with 700c wheels and not enough frame to go with them... It must all be in what we are used to looking at ourselves that we think looks right.  There are some limited road bikes out there which use 650b wheels for the smallest frame sizes....

Avatar
joules1975 replied to hawkinspeter | 7 months ago
2 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Larger wheels have a few issues. Firstly, as they're uncommon, there's far less choice of rims and tyres. Larger wheels are going to be heavier and have more inertia which will affect handling a bit (more stable, less nimble) and they're also less aerodynamic although I'd imagine that's going to be quite a small difference.

Apparently, bigger wheels don't roll noticeably quicker on roads, although they do show an advantage for MTB riding: https://www.renehersecycles.com/myth-17-bigger-wheels-roll-faster-amended/

The handling issues of larger wheels can be overcome through geometry tweaks, as has happened in the MTB world (through the use of trail and fork offsets).

The other side effects of inertia, namely the effect of the 'feel' of the bike when accelerating are well known to be negated by the flywheel benefits for most riders (riding that requires a lot of accelerations and decelerations would be an exception here, such as crit racing). So bigger wheels wouldn't feel as fast, but would likely be no slowing in reality for most use cases.

The rolling resistance of larger wheels is more advantagous the rougher the road surface becomes, so on billiard smooth roads there is no benefit, but how many of us now regularly ride on roads that are rougher than many gravel paths?

Larger wheels do present a problem for smaller riders, where there simply isn't the space in the frame to accomodate the wheels. With road bikes, that is unlikely to be resolved, but with gravel bikes increasingly going in the long, low, slack direction that mountain bikes went in, there could be scope to slot the larger wheels into those gravel bikes in all but the very smallest of sizes as the front centre of the bikes are increasing enough anyway.

The reality though there is one things that will likely get in the way of bigger wheels being introduced, at least for road bikes - the general resistance to change in the road bike world (for many reasons, some justified, some not).

Avatar
bikes replied to cyclisto | 7 months ago
0 likes

Does MTB really still have 3 sizes? Last time I bought 26” MTB tyres, there didn't seem to be much choice compared to the other two sizes. And when frames are sold with different wheel sizes available, it seems to be a choice between either 27.5" or 29”.

Avatar
fwhite181 | 7 months ago
0 likes

I'm signed up to the PPP 3*200 version of this. Really interesting to see your kit/setup for the full 600! Fingers crossed for some sunshine and gentle breezes...

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to fwhite181 | 7 months ago
2 likes

fwhite181 wrote:

I'm signed up to the PPP 3*200 version of this. Really interesting to see your kit/setup for the full 600! Fingers crossed for some sunshine and gentle breezes...

if it's on the same weekend, don't worry, I aways come back from Wales with sunburn. Brevet Cymru was glorious last weekend, and I expect more of the same next time. Although BCM also includes a short sharp shower normally, so don't leave the shakedry at home.

Latest Comments