- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
22 comments
And yet... according to the 'West Yorkshire decriminalising bad driving' topic, which is confirming my own experience of being hit by vehicles in Lancashire, the police are sniggering behind the No-Bloody-Bikes-Here Sheds because they're refusing to investigate until you're properly smashed up, when there's a good chance the camera will be smashed as well (Magic, Sarge!- insufficient evidence!). So, at first sight, all this camera stuff is a waste of time and money- as long as you let the police get away with doing nothing. In the words of Thin Lizzie (showing my age!) Fightttt!!!
Similar to others - I run a Cycliq Fly6CE at the back, and a Go Pro Hero (just Hero, no number - their basic entry level one from 2018) on the front. In terms of picture, there's no discernible difference to me. But for me the Cycliq wins on usability for my usage, which is (or was!) primarily commuting. The fact that it overwrites in a loop is really useful (whereas on the GoPro I have to delete footage manually when full), and the battery life is better (the Cycliq tended to last for 5 legs of my commute, versus 2 -3 legs for the Go Pro. NB: I used a separate light, so wasn't using the light function on the Cycliq). Also much easier to remove from its mount. But the software updating on the Cycliq has been a bit flaky. The date / time stamp went wildly wrong, and for a while I found it difficult to get it to connect to my PC to update the settings / firmware to fix that. And I've just noticed that this week it appears to have decided to stop recording sound - haven't tried fixing that yet.
I've had various cameras over the years and Fly 6 (rear) and Fly 12 (front) is by far the best; combo lights, loop recording and easy to shift between bikes. GoPro for recording footage of a classic ride, for example, but as a safety camera they're a hassle; battery life (you need to carry a spare) and deleting footage if the memory is full.
I use a gopro hero6 on the front ( carry an extra battery and make sure screen is off/timeout after short delay). Quality is great.
I use a Cycliq Fly6 CE on rear. Quality is OK, but sound really only picks up road buzz and drivetrain noise. It also has a mind of its own when paired with the app. Light sequence is random, can stop mid ride on record, or not even start at all, so getting back from a ride can leave you frustrated when you think you should have caught something and there is no footage....
At the moment I'm running a go-pro on the front and a Cycliq Fly6 (Gen 3) on the rear. The Go-pro footage is significantly clearer, especially in low light and/or on bumpy roads. However, the battery life isn't great - I get about an hour and a half. That might be long enough for you, but something to be aware of for longer rides.
The Fly6 is generally OK. Battery life is longer, but maximised by not using the light at the same time (which slightly defeats the point IMHO). I have also had one experience when I was riding early in the morning (i.e. dark) and the Cycliq decided just to shut off all the lights (whilst still recording video) which didn't impress me, and Cycliq's support response was also lacklustre. Luckily I had a spare rear light!
In terms of putting the videos side by side etc., that all comes down to your video editing software. The cameras all record standard video files and so can be opened by any standard programme. I currently use Garmin's video editor, which is fine for basic tasks - although I haven't tried anything complicated!
Ha! My son has told me to join this forum as I had another near miss yesterday which ill post when I find where to...
I decided to take up cycling every day after a 40-year break. Maybe I did a bit when the boys were around growing up, but I was keen in the late 70's and skint- so I used to cycle to London from Welling each day on my Raleigh Medale. Anyway, I now cycle on assisted MTBS and both have DRAGON TECH go pro cameras that give you about an hr and a half battery life (they come with 2 batteries each and a dual-charger) My first was a present from my eldest son, the 2nd was off ebay 2nd-hand for £25. I never go out without the camera on and in a year, I’ve had some near-misses, despite during lockdown- no one’s supposed to be out except for exercise of essential, blah blah. The Dragon tech gets my vote and it’s in its waterproof housing and has been soaked a few timers (I’m out for an hour each day, usually about 10-12 miles depending on the route)- Camera battery lasts well provided the screen timeout is limited.
Damn! I must have missed that Aldi- I would have bought it! The other article contains a lot of useful information. GoPro Hero 7 Black good as a camera, but the PC software is dire and getting worse as they have abandoned it. It will now not recognise the camera so getting the videos off is even more of a pain. You need that GPS timing and location data.
I have a couple of https://www.flyingtech.co.uk/fpv-camera-gimbals/mobius-actioncam-1080p-h... that have a couple of hours worth of filming per charge.
I also have an Aldi rear light which is a copy of the Cycliq rear light which works very well.
My Aldi look alike has outlasted a Cycliq Fly 12 and has better battery life.
Yep my Aldi copy lasts me 3 or 4 rides before I take it off to charge it, but that's before it needs charging, it's never run out of charge in use. Quality is good enough to read number plates during daylight hours. Wish I'd bought two
I've just bought a Drift Ghost, I've just got to find an adaptor to fix it to a GoPro mount. The Drift Ghost has a 4 hour battery life making it longer lasting than my GoPro.
Quality should be as good as a GoPro
I had an SJ4000 for a holiday front camera, and the quality of the footage was fine for evidential use,but battery life was similar to my GoPro
I have the Shimano CM2000 and it lives in a drawer... useless battery life, and the app/interface is a joke. Once the card is full recording stops and to clear the card you either need to connect via app which is a PITA, or remove the card and use a PC etc. Complete waste of money....
The Cyliq ones have my interest now, just trying to justify the price to myself That, and they seem to be out of stock everywhere atm... is that because of Brexit/Corona/a ship being stuck in the Suez, or is a new model around the corner? Who knows...
I also have a Go-Pro style "Action Cam" from Aldi somewhere that I might dig out in the meantime...
Genunine question though, is there a point to having cameras? I mean other than adding to the "near miss" videos on here, what do you do with the footage? Sending to the Police seems to give negligable results and in some cases comes back on the cyclist should they have dared touch a pavement/shared use pathway.
I used to commute with the Shimano cam strapped to my helmet, it's quite big, therefore visible and between that and the hi-viz winter jersey I noticed drivers gave me a wide berth... probably to avoid the weirdo, but if it works, it works!
+1 for the Shinamo CM2000 in the drawer, wonder if that is where they all live?
Now using a cheap CrossTour on the commute.
Same - picture quality was quite good, but damn it's fiddly to use and a total inconveniece as a 'dashcam'. Shimano abandoned it, so no spare batteries or accessories were available.
I just bit the bullet and got the Cycliq (older models, on discount when the new CE's came out) and apart from a shonky battery on the Fly6 that I had to DIY replace after 14 months, they've been solid. Nothing else comes close in terms of convenience for using daily.
+1 for the Shimano - although I managed to get almost what I paid for mine as I got it on a good deal from Sigma at the time (or ProBikeKit)
"Genuine question though, is there a point to having cameras? "
I believe that you covered it, with the lack of automation meaning that the user has to a. Be able to press the save button, b. Be able to extract the police guidance compliant clip, c. Be lucky enough to live in an area where the CPO or Commissioner takes road crime seriously, d. Be willing to escalate to their Member of Parliament or County Councillor responsible for Highways.
So that's a fair amount of time and effort to conduct the democratic process.
If that's an unreasonable effort to go about your lawful business on the public roads, you might consider how to appear an equal hazard to the motoring public so that they do give you due care and attention....
"Genunine question though, is there a point to having cameras?"
1. Allows you to review your own actions following an incident. There's usually something to learn.
2. Police may not take any action following an incident, but they definitely won't without a complaint and some accompanying evidence.
3. I've got some decent footage of club rides that are nice to share with others.
4. If you have a financial loss following an incident which involves a registeted vehicle then it is easier to trace the insurer and to make a successful claim for damages.
5. Evidence if a pothole caused damage.
6. If the message gets out that cyclists carry cameras and that bad driving will be reported (and followed up, but that is out of your control and another subject for debate) then maybe we all benefit from the "poison arrow frog" effect.
on point 6, I genuinely think it could be millenia before that happens. none of the incidents I experience on the road do I ever believe just by the way the person doing the stupid thing in their car behaves, ever thinks that I or any cyclist might just have a video camera recording them, I bet most of the ones who receive letters from the police are completely gobsmacked about it. I dont know if these letters even state the evidence came from a cyclists video camera, or it just reports you were observed by a member of the public driving badly around a cyclist.
Ive had to verbally warn people 4 times in seperate incidents where their behaviour was getting very out of hand,or they were threatening violence onto me, to carefully choose what they did next because they were being recorded on video that would be used as evidence against them. And it takes that much for them to even consider its a possibility.
I mean the police here reported a driver in an Audi tried to race with one of their marked cars the other day, a car with blue flashing lights and the word Police written on the side, and was surprised to be pulled over, which I think is the 2nd time last month a car has overtaken one of their police cars whilst breaking the law and been surprised to get stopped..
so what hope do we have as cyclists with drivers like that around ?
7. Useful in proving who was driving, which cuts down on that particular well-exploited loophole
I agree with the helmet cam point. No stats but I get the feeling I get better treatment with an Apeman (go pro style) on my helmet. I also think it shows that you are looking round as you move out and, as the highway code specifically mentions this, it may avoid the "well he didn't signal" response. You can also look at the number plate longer to give you a better chance of getting it which I needed for my last submission which was dealt with by a visit from a PC to have words. A satisfactory outcome as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't have got it with a front facing camera. Worth looking a bit of a prat for on balance.
The Apeman footage seems OK apart from low light and night time but I think most cameras struggle with these. Batteries last 90 to 120 mins and I carry enough batteries to cover the bike ride. It takes around a minute to swap over. They are cheap as well. I prefer the A66. No WIFI, no 4K but HD at 30fps is good enough. I now leave the anti shake off and I think I get better results registration number wise
Depends on the average length of your rides. If mostly commuting then Go Pro or a knockoff should suffice.
If wanted for longer/weekend riding with a tea stop, then the pretty much the only things that can hit or exceed the 4hr mark are the Cycliq's. Downsides may include expensive extra mounts (look for 3d printed ones on ebay) and there's been quite a few complains about the older models rear charging flap letting in water. Neither of which has impacted mine, and they were both 2nd hard off of ebay.
If price isn't a factor then Cycliq or GoPro are probably your best options. Have a look at this article (and the comments on it) - https://road.cc/content/buyers-guide/how-buy-best-bike-camera-255982
Great - thanks!
How did I miss that article when I did a search earlier!