Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Lights in the UK

I'm seeing more and more lights being sold in the UK with different colour options, which seems odd to me, as my understanding of the law is that its illegal to run anything other than white on the front and red at the rear.  And that's it.  Just yeterday whilst trawling  online I found a rear light which alternated red and blue.  Has the law in the UK changed without me knowing?!

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
Simon E | 4 years ago
1 like

I've seen some TTers using a rear light that flashes red and blue, and IIRC also white. Not sure what it's called. AFAIK red is the only legal colour for a rear light.

I know the Scorpion which has several red LEDs and 1 green. The page has some disclaimer-type text in red which might help:

https://www.four4th.co.uk/products/scorpion-qr

Avatar
OnYerBike | 4 years ago
1 like

1) There's a difference between what is legal to sell and what is legal to use on a public road. E-scooters is a case in point, but true for many other products.

2) The law is a bit more complicated than that - a good run-down is here: https://www.cyclinguk.org/lighting-regulations 

In particular, it appears that as long as you have at least one white front light, you can also have lights of any other colour (EXCEPT red) displaying to the front, while at the rear you can ONLY have red light(s). NB - I haven't read all the regs and ammendments in details so might have missed something! 

3) In general, as long as you're well lit you probably won't have much trouble with actual police officers. If an insurance claim were to arise you might have more difficulty, although it would be an interesting case to see if they try to argue contributory negligence ("I didn't see him because he had a flashing red and blue light that camouflaged him perfectly...")

Avatar
brooksby replied to OnYerBike | 4 years ago
0 likes

OnYerBike wrote:

... E-scooters is a case in point ...

 

Sorry to hijack.

But - those bl00dy escooterists!

They are illegal to ride on the road.  Or the footpath.  Or the shared-use area. 

Can someone please do something about it???

I am so sick of meeting salmoning escooters in a cycle lane, or some buffed-up bloke (seriously, why are so many of their riders so buffed?) speeding through the shared-use area with way less concern for pedestrians than I ever show as a cyclist...?

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to brooksby | 4 years ago
1 like

But Socrati supports them so they are alright. Coventry have already suspended their hire scheme trial because off all the Ped path users but that was always going to be the case. 

The hire schemes are pretty much only legal on roads, Shared use and cycle lanes, but because of the size of them people still see them as ped path only use and not something to use on roads.

Avatar
TheBillder replied to brooksby | 4 years ago
3 likes

The problem surely is the rider not the e-scooter. Every scooterer isn't driving so we need to make sure they can be used safely. UK vehicle legislation has always had problems with categorisation and standards, so that innovation (e.g. led lights, to wrench this back to the actual topic) is stifled or operations are illegal.

I think e-scooter riding should be treated in the same way as cycling, and both badly need better infrastructure and the hierarchy of vulnerability that might come into the Highway Code. Better scooterism, not banning.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 4 years ago
3 likes
brooksby wrote:

Sorry to hijack.

But - those bl00dy escooterists!

They are illegal to ride on the road.  Or the footpath.  Or the shared-use area. 

Can someone please do something about it???

I am so sick of meeting salmoning escooters in a cycle lane, or some buffed-up bloke (seriously, why are so many of their riders so buffed?) speeding through the shared-use area with way less concern for pedestrians than I ever show as a cyclist...?

Someone on a scooter is potentially one less car on the road, and they can do a lot less damage to others by not being encased in metal, never-mind the reduction in congestion and pollution. As they're getting more common, I think we should just legalise them and deal with the problems that could create and get people out of cars. Personal transport via cars doesn't scale well in cities, so we should adopt what works well in other countries.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to hawkinspeter | 4 years ago
0 likes

So, are there any examples from countries where escootering works well, and what can we learn from those?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Sriracha | 4 years ago
0 likes
Sriracha wrote:

So, are there any examples from countries where escootering works well, and what can we learn from those?

I was impressed with the amount of traffic flowing around Copenhagen which has lots of infrastructure to separate motor vehicles from bikes and scooters. I was only there on holiday, so it'd be interesting to see how the residents view them, but I thought that e-scooters and cycles were able to safely share the same space.

However, when I went to Paris (again, just a holiday) there were a lot of e-scooters ridden on the roads as well as pavements which seemed to cause more of an issue. I was surprised that I didn't see any aggression from the motorists when sharing the road with the e-scooters but it looked a bit precarious from an onlooker. They do seem to have a big problem with the scooters littering the pavements but I don't know if that's more of a cultural difference between France and Denmark. There were a lot more cycle lanes than I expected for a major big city.

I think the lesson is that if there's decent infrastructure then people are actually quite flexible in changing how they travel around the place. The other aspect is having good public transport that provides space for bikes and e-scooters. (I have never seen a train carriage so crowded as one in Copenhagen that must have had about thirty bikes crammed in so tight that people could hardly move).

Avatar
Captain Badger | 4 years ago
1 like

Alternating red and blue! Sick lights dude!

As flashing red is legal (now I believe) it could be argued that this is flashing red and filling the gap with blue. 

I suspect it's one of those laws that as long as the spirit is adhered to, the rozzers won't particularly care about the letter (unless they're looking for trouble of course).

Whether insurance companies would wish to dispute on this in a claim is another matter

Avatar
Hirsute | 4 years ago
1 like

Not illegal to sell, maybe illegal to use.
If you have the legal requirement, can you add a red/blue light - don't know.

Also depends where the light was being shipped from.

Latest Comments