Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Second London 'die-in' to be held at Vauxhall Cross this Thursday morning

Stop Killing Cyclists group follows up November's vigil and die-in outside TfL HQ with this week's 'Requiem'...

Londoners concerned about the safety of cyclists in the city are being invited to attend a second ‘die-in’ protest weeks after around 1,000 people attended a similar event outside the Southwark headquarters of Transport for London (TfL).

Dubbed a ‘Requiem Die-In,’ the scene for Thursday morning’s protest will be Vauxhall Cross and it starts at 7.30am, coinciding with rush hour. People attending are asked to bring white sheets with them to cover their bodies as they lie on the ground.

Like last month's event (pictured above), It is being organised by the group Stop Killing Cyclists, who describes themselves as a “a radical peaceful cycling protest movement in London.” 

They say the protest aims to:

• remember all victims of this treacherous intersection

• highlight the plight of cyclists who are forced from a segregated lane into potentially lethal traffic on the Southern approach to Vauxhal Bridge and

• call for an extension of the existing cycle-specific infrastructure.

So far, more than 200 people have confirmed on the event’s Facebook page that they will be attending, with over 100 others saying they may go.

Last month’s protest came after six cyclists died on London’s streets in a two-week period in the first half of November, all of them in collisions with large vehicles.

Ahead of the November die-in, organiser Donnachadh McCarthy McCarthy said the group was inspired by the example of Dutch protesters in the early 1970s who campaigned under the banner Stop de Kindermoord (Stop the Murder of Children), a reference to the hundreds of children killed there each year after being hit by vehicles.

He said: “We Londoners are going to join the Dutch, and follow them until we get our roads safe.

“So I respectfully ask you now, London cyclists and pedestrians and drivers who have come to join us today, to lie on the pavement with your bicycles, turn on your lights and let them flash in the memories of people killed and injured in the last eight years.”

He also pointed out that no cycling or pedestrian groups were represented on the board of TfL.

Leader of Southwark Council, Peter John, agreed that was something that needed addressing, and told BBC London News: “If we are going to follow a Dutch-style approach it will mean re-defining and re-planning how traffic moves around our capital, in a way that we haven’t really had before.

“That needs strategic overview, that needs the mayor to bring councils together... and he needs to do it soon.”

However, in response to last month’s vigil, London’s cycling commissioner Andrew Gilligan, appointed by Boris Johnson earlier this year, suggested protesters were being deliberately provocative in making demands that they knew could not be met.

Writing on the Talk London website, he said: “One of the demo’s demands is for a ‘ban on any vehicles whose drivers cannot see adjacent road users’ – in other words, a ban on lorries.

“This would, of course, cripple London’s economy, empty the supermarkets and throw hundreds of thousands out of work overnight.

“Maybe the die-in people just haven’t thought about their demands. Worse, maybe they have – and are deliberately asking for things they know neither we, nor any administration, can give, so we can then be accused of selling out.

“The problem, I suppose, for the diers-in is that we have a highly ambitious cycling programme. What can they ask us to do that we’re not doing already? ... We promise to do a huge network of cycle routes by 2016 – so the demand becomes for an even bigger network, to be finished even sooner.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

9 comments

Avatar
Crankwinder | 10 years ago
0 likes

"We promise to do a huge network of cycle routes by 2016 – so the demand becomes for an even bigger network, to be finished even sooner.” - Because society has done NOTHING for 50 years except make the roads more hostile for cycling. So now there is a mountain to climb and that so-called huge network does not even scale the foothills.

Avatar
zanf | 10 years ago
0 likes

Nothing will change under the mayorship of Johnson, with his toady little journo sycophant Gilligan in tow, and for the one simple fact that Johnson will not do anything which will decrease traffic flow, despite that being the central tenet of what has to change.

I'll be going along to this tomorrow as that gyratory system is almost on my doorstep (and its a disgusting piece of road design) if I wake up early enough as its the company christmas party tonight, and that could get very messy!

Avatar
hood | 10 years ago
0 likes

"However, in response to last month’s vigil, London’s cycling commissioner Andrew Gilligan, appointed by Boris Johnson earlier this year, suggested protesters were being deliberately provocative in making demands that they knew could not be met."

sounds similar to TFL / RMT unions going on strike. and it works! (sometimes!)

Avatar
Matt eaton | 10 years ago
0 likes

Great to see some on-the-ground action in the capital that's upsetting a few politicians. More please  1

Avatar
congokid | 10 years ago
0 likes

Gilligan's strawman arguments were all addressed and demolished on the talklondon bike blog.

Avatar
teaboy | 10 years ago
0 likes

“The problem, I suppose, for the diers-in is that we have a highly ambitious cycling programme. What can they ask us to do that we’re not doing already?

http://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2013/12/16/the-nags-head-scheme...

What people want is a city that's safe for cycling, and encourages those people who won't ride currently because it's seen as too dangerous to get on their bikes. There's no point having 'a highly ambitious programme' if what you propose is more of the same shit we have now.

Avatar
a.jumper | 10 years ago
0 likes

There'll be far fewer at this one because commuters can more readily stay after work (like for the first protest) than arrive even earlier. It'll be interesting to see how many this still musters.

Avatar
jasecd replied to a.jumper | 10 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

“One of the demo’s demands is for a ‘ban on any vehicles whose drivers cannot see adjacent road users’ – in other words, a ban on lorries.

No it's not - it is a ban on lorries who are so poorly designed that the driver cannot see adjacent road users. A lorry with proper visibility, be that electronic or line of sight, would be exempt from the ban and, as is the point, be far safer for other road users.

Avatar
hood replied to a.jumper | 10 years ago
0 likes
a.jumper wrote:

There'll be far fewer at this one because commuters can more readily stay after work (like for the first protest) than arrive even earlier. It'll be interesting to see how many this still musters.

it will be very interesting i agree. i'd guess that barely anyone turns up. i dont know many people who will take a big detour on their route to work then sit about in the cold while they make themselves late for work.
why hasnt it been organised for evening rush hour again?

Latest Comments