What happens when a sportive meets a road race coming the other way? Some heated tempers, a bit of shouting, and the odd cyclist ignoring instructions, thereby putting themselves and other riders in danger, according to this video shot in North Yorkshire at the weekend.
With the Yorkshire Region Road Race Championship about to turn the corner from Saxton onto the A162 Tadcaster Road, one marshal can be seen stopping traffic to allow the race to pass safely.
But it’s the other marshal, out of camera, who has his hands full as some of the sportive riders ignore instructions to get off the road – one man in a green, blue and white striped Kelme kit putting himself in a position where he could have caused a serious crash.
The sportive those riders are taking part in appears to be the Cyclothon, organised by the Prince of Wales Hospice in Pontefract and with a route that took riders north along the A162 and past the Saxton turning.
It’s unclear how the two events came to be on the same road at the same time but it does appear that there was a breakdown in communication somewhere along the line.
Like the Yorkshire Region Road Race Championship, the sportive took place on Sunday 18 May and both events are listed on the British Cycling website.
It would not have been difficult for the respective organsiers to become aware of another event in the same area and liaise with each other to check there was no route conflict.
There have been similar incidents in the past – albeit not captured on video – a reflection of the growing popularity of both road racing and sportive riding, leading to growth in the number of events, although mechanisms are in place to avoid such conflict.
The road race was subject to a Traffic Regulation Order, allowing marshals to halt traffic, and which would have needed authorisation from police and the relevant local authorities, as outlined in British Cycling’s Road Race Organiser’s Guide.
The sportive organisers would also have needed to have notified such bodies of their plans, as well as checking for potential conflicts with other events. In its Cycle Sportive Event Guidelines, British Cycling says:
When choosing a route, consider any other events that are scheduled to be using the designated roads on that day. Examples include running, triathlon, village, or town based events, parades, etc as well as any other cycle events.
It is therefore recommended that the local authorities, highways and the Police are notified of any proposed events in the early planning stages, as they may also offer information of other planned events, which may not have been noticed, or are yet to be publicised. If route clashes are apparent it is the organiser’s responsibility to take the necessary measures to ensure their event can run safely and not unreasonably impact on local communities. A list of most cycle events can be found at British Cycling’s online events calendar and should be checked regularly across all disciplines for events on and around the proposed event day. This may be accessed from www.britishcycling.org.uk/events British Cycling encourages organisers to work together and agree alternative event days or a change of route being considered to avoid event conflict.
Add new comment
84 comments
Just settle down lads and have a nice cup of Tetley's tea...
I read the whole thread of comments before watching the vid so I am somewhat underwhelmed.
Nothing much happens. The sportive riders mainly pull in to the side and wait. One guy doesn't but then does when he sees what's happening. He's probably more dopey than arrogant. Everyone then gets on with their lives presumably, apart from unseen grumbly guy who's probably still chuntering on to himself.
Coming from Lancashire its great to hear two Yorkshiremen going at it.
Stereotypically, Yorkshiremen are never wrong, just big heads!
I did feel a bit sorry for the marshal though.
Lets hope the TdF has no such cock ups. Now, if we were doing it on the best side of the Pennines say in Manchester, or Liverpool, Wigan or Preston.........
Bit underwhelming when you view the vid. Main problem is the routes crossed, and people got confused which cycling event the marshals were covering. An organisational problem.
I've had to deal with sportive riders whilst marshalling a race but they were all receptive and understanding. Gladly I've never encountered people like those in the video (yet), but I'm disappointed that I have never been called 'sunbeam'!
Yeah lets enter a sportive!!
We get to bimble around 5 abreast chucking our gel wrappers in the hedge just like real racers.
See my number?!! Yeah, imma racing, better get out my way.
Sportives are where it's at.
Doesn't spoil anything for real cyclist, watcha talking about?...You're an idiot. Bet you never even done a sportive.
You can tell a Yorkshireman, but you can't tell him much.
There are a couple of people on here suggesting that the road race shouldn't have been on the wrong side of the road. Unless I'm mistaken though the road closure is in both directions, suggesting that everyone involved in organising it knows it's a fast corner that needs a clear road.
Seems pretty obvious who is at fault.
Dear Roadies,
Some of the abusive comments on this thread about other cyclists based purely on what event they chose to do to enjoy their saturday afternoon make me utterly ashamed to be associated with road biking.
Go and read your own rule book, many of you for the first time by the sound of it. Skip to Rule 20.12.2 if you find the whole document too much of a challenge, but bear in mind, your licence includes a statement that you understand and agree to obey all 34 pages worth.
Having done so I would hope that some of you go back and read what you have posted above in a new light. Many of you should be posting apologies for your comments.
But just in case you are still too short-sighted to understand;
Get lost you bunch of arrogant twats!
The road race has no right to infringe into the lane of oncoming traffic. Even if they are 'expecting' a closed junction it is still absolutely their own responsibility to be aware of all the conditions, any road furniture, and any other road users and to take the corner safely. Whether that was a group of sportive riders, or a truck driver that ignores the marshall, or if it is a fallen tree, or a random old man on a mobility scooter (see the women's tour of UK last week for that one) it is still up to the riders to behave in a safe manner and to obey the laws of the road at all times.
As for the abuse some of you have thrown at Sportive riders in general. You should try taking your heads out of your arse for a while. Just because you like one part of the sport and they like another doesn't make you better than them. Just because you go a bit faster certainly doesn't.
I was in the road race and can vouch for the organisers. It was very well marshalled and very well organised. There were plenty of clear signs were up several days in advance "advance warning of road race" with date of event at each junction. The couple of idiots who ignored the marshalls should be ashamed, take a step back and realise they were very wrong and openly apologise. If they don't it says even more about them than others have already said. Luckily there was no crash. This is nothing to do with sportive riders v road race riders. This is just about a couple of head strong cyclists that made a big error and total fools of themselves as the video shows. There were also members of public who witnessed these individuals clearly ignore the marshals who were trying very hard to protect all groups from an accident.
Incidentally, it's not just sportives but club runs too that will often ignore an approaching road race.
Accredited marshals may have the legal power to stop and hold non-race traffic but that is not the solution.
In today's world, the real answer is to apply to your local authority for a road closure order. That can be in the form of a total road closure (usually for smaller circuits) or a rolling road closure.
The former will almost certainly call for a traffic management plan and if the race is likely to attract any sort of a crowd, at least one meeting with the local safety advisory group.
This approach might seem rather daunting at first but you gain confidence and experience the more events you organise. Certainly something that the BC regions or promoting groups should be taking on board. A bit more of a effort is of course required than just twisting the arm of somebody in the club to take on the burden.
The rolling road closure will necessitate hiring a team of police motor-cyclists to precede the race and stop approaching traffic. Apart from Highways Agency Traffic Officers, nobody else will have the authority to do that.
Hiring police need not be that expensive if ACPO guidelines are followed. If your local police force won't co-operate, find out precisely what other organisations are charged for their services.
Initially, the best way to achieve the closed road scenario for your race is to approach your local parish or district council. Get them on side and you'll be surprised how things can progress. Road closure orders are normally issued by the county or unitary highways' authorities and if the event is either linked to a charity or can be classified as a community event there is often no charge.
One of the obvious advantages of a road closure for a cycle race is that all other traffic, whether motor powered or pedal powered is thereby prevented from entering onto the course, including pedestrians and horse riders. That measure will then oblige the sportive organiser to re-route his/her event, rather than the road race organiser.
Well, normally the authorities would know. However, sportives don't have a lot in the way of obligations - I've even known for a "real" race to be cancelled because a sportive went through the route and the police can cancel the race but not the sportive.
Re. being on the left: any vehicle can cross a dashed centreline to overtake (although some BC regions have been funny about racers doing this). Also I haven't seen the video but on corners riders will swing wide - marshalls should stop the traffic coming from head-on precisely because of this.
Shocking generalisation from Leodis. What a thick ****.
How's that feel? Nice isn't it!
(I've never ridden a sportive btw, I just think the attitude of some peoplel posting on here completely stinks).
Not wanting to defend the sportive riders too much, but has anyone considered that they simply didn't realise there was another event on?
Imagine you are on an organised sportive and you see road signs saying "Road Temporarily Closed for Cycling Event" or some such. It would not be entirely unreasonable to think that might be for the event you are doing and just carry on.
No excuse for ignoring the marshal of course, but it might explain the confusion.
Ultimately the organisers on both sides should have been aware of the other event and sorted things out between themselves, not left it to the marshals and mamils.
Cyclists giving cyclists a bad name, thanks a million guys.
Brain dead. Demerits all 'round.
A generalization I know but, there are too many sportive riders who can't ride a bike properly in a group let alone understand the etiquette.
And when some of them get fit enough to race they will not be told and therefore never learn what I learnt on a traditional "club run".
I think you are falling into the 'them and us' trap here. A bit like motorists calling cyclists twats and vice versa.
Assuming that people ride sportives because they are not man enough to ride a proper race is not helpful here.
All the of people who think the sportive riders were in the "wrong" are clearly the road.cc sheep / fascists brigade.
Baa Baa.
Another non-story from road.cc.....
The sportive riders are under no obligation to "get off the "road" aka public highways", if they want to race on public highways hen i suggest they learn to share.
-10000/10 road.cc
Could you sink any lower?
I wish someone had taken the guy in the Kelme kit out, what on earth was he thinking? He then moved into the middle of the lane
Yeah. That would *really* have helped.
May be a daft question but has anyone got a sportive planned in Yorkshire on 5th July?
Looks like stripey got some karmic justice, at 1:55 I'm sure I can see his back wheel topple as he tries to stop by the pavement?
You have said it jssb, I do like riding sportives, a bit of nostalgia for me.
I suspect that a few will go from riding sportives to full on road races, they are a great idea and good for cycling.
BUT, some of the behaviour and poor skill I see is stunning; like a cyclist overtaking another who was turning right and a small group urinating against someone's front gate. Then the gel wrappers.....
'The Peloton Effect.....
It is tricky, as we must not put people off riding or try to make it too elitist.
However, A lot of Sportive riders seem to think that the rules of the road do not apply when on a sportive.
I have seen such bad riding on sportives lately and you know that the riders would simply not replicate it when riding alone.
We have christened it the Peloton effect.
To the riders ignoring the Marshall, would you ride across a level crossing with the barriers down too?
Sportives are becoming very dangerous places to ride, lack of helmets seems to be quite common as does the use of Tri bars, it is only going to be a matter of time before a bad accident forces tighter regulation to the detriment of all.
Hate to say but this manner of riding is typical to sportive events.
Seems to attract bloody minded cyclists who think rules of the road do not apply to them when riding such events. A lot seem to think they are riding closed roads they ride. They also think it's a 'race'. Funny they encountered a real race.
If any of them who ignored the closed road sign have a club jersey then they should be banned from futures events.
So the car drivers sit there patiently while the cyclists behave like dickheads.... now I am depressed.
But, "I've done 54 races me" Great quote....
"Yorkshire Divs Road Race" - says it all.
SURELY the riders had been told before hand?
The worrying thing is that the guy arguing with the marshal is a past / maybe present organisers of road races.
Anyway I don't want to be too hard on people - it's too easy to make comments on forums which are basically uninformed, and this is maybe just a snipet of what really happened.
I would love it though if stripy shirt guy saw this and gave his opinion of what happened. It's would be nice to understand what really happened here from people who were there. Even when he is riding head on in to the peloton he seems oblivious to the danger
Maybe their wasn't enough signage warning the sportive riders to stop........ I don't know. But they really weren't listening to the marshal.
Note to diary: arm all marshals with video cameras at next sportive event. I kid you not
Pages