Disc brakes will appear in the professional road peloton in 2016, according to Jeroen Snijders Blok of the World Federation Sporting Goods Industry (WFSGI).
Snijders Blok is also chief operating officer of Accell Group, owner of bike brands including Lapierre, Raleigh, Ghost, Koga Myata and Van Nicholas. He is the bike industry representative on the board of directors of WFSGI, which has been meeting with the UCI Equipment Commission to discuss the technical regulation of race bikes and the sometimes fractious relationship between the industry and the UCI.
Reacting to a claim on Benelux trade website www.tweewieler.nl that discs would be approved for 2015, Snijders Blok told that site's pan-European sister site Bike Europe: “The report on Tweewieler.nl surprised me. It is true that we are getting positive responses in our meetings with the UCI. But despite that it will take longer than 2015 for the UCI to approve the usage of disc brakes in professional road racing.
“That it will take longer is caused by an extensive examination the UCI wants on the consequences the usage of disc brakes will have.
“They want to know more on what for instance happens at 80km/h descents; what's the heat then at carbon rims? Could this cause severe skin burns in the event of a fall? The UCI wants to have such matters clarified before any approval.”
"So, first this examination must be completed and the results discussed. All this means that it will take up to 2016 before professionals will use disc brakes. I do not expect that all this will take up to 2017. The usage of UCI approved disc brakes at WorldTour races will happen in 2016. At least, that's what I expect now."
You might think you’d have bigger things to worry about than rotor burn if you deck it at 50mph. It seems likely that as well as safety concerns, the UCI is also worried about more mundane factors such as wheel interchangeability.
Widespread adoption of disc brakes could substantially increase the complexity of providing neutral technical support in big races. At the moment neutral support in, say, the Tour de France just has to deal with the difference between Shimano and Campagnolo sprocket clusters.
Add in all the combinations and permutations of 130mm and 135mm rear axles; through-axless conventional quick releases; and 140mm and 160mm rotors, and Mavic will have to replace its cars with big yellow lorries to carry enough spares.
At the moment, only Shimano actually has a working road bike disc brake on the market. Depending on how you look at it, it’s either a bit premature for the UCI to be thinking about allowing a technology that’s not yet available to all teams, or refreshingly foresightful to be trying to anticipate the issues.
Of the other two big component makers, SRAM’s recalled disc brakes were supposed to reappear in April, but are still in redesign hell and Campagnolo says its discs won’t be available until 2016. It could be that the UCI is deliberately giving all players plenty of time to get ready.
That goes for bike makers too. You’d expect companies the size of Trek and Specialized to be designing competition-level bikes with an eye on possible UCI rule developments, but Trek has recently plumped for bolt-through axles with the disc version of the Domane 6.9, while the recently-unveiled Specialized Tarmac uses conventional quick-release skewers.
It seems what we have here is another example of the adage that the bike industry adores standards, that's why it has so many of them. From the point of view of everyday riders, the UCI might impose some welcome order on the current free-for-all.
Add new comment
65 comments
Thanks @adamthekiwi for answering that nonsense. Armchair experts are creeping out of the woodwork. Having ridden discs on MTB for some 8 years or so, I'll quite happily state that anyone who claims changing a disc braked wheel is slower than a rim braked one is speaking drivel. In fact, discs are QUICKER since they do not have to be released and then reset like side-pull or v-brakes.
The only time the pads will close is if someone pulls on the brakes while the disc wheel has been removed: the sort of tyro mistake no competent race mechanic would make.
Either many of the response come from people who don't use discs a lot or they don't maintain their bikes well. I went to discs on the MTB very early on and regularly swap wheels around as its quicker than changing tyres. Can't remember ever having to spread the pads, just like I don't on the dozens of motorcycles I have had with discs.
As the stupid UCI have imposed lawyers lips anyway I can't see through axles being much of a handicap. It is a shite idea though as pulled axles can contaminate if dropped in the gravel and they are really just a solution that isn't really finished yet. Not needed at the back IMO.
Both my road bikes have discs. From experience (how much of the above is?) they are no more likely to lock up. Indeed possible less in poor conditions as when you are fighting a wet braking surface your are not having to pull as ahrd.
Re amateurs. so what. They can change when they want to.
Discs can be safer. I get a bit of arthritis and my hands ache on long descents. Discs mean I brake less and with less effort. Quite possibly that poor girl who died recently, Devon? not the one in Winnants might be alive as the verdict suggested cyclist's palsy.Maybe the other one might have not had problems either. Guess work of course.
Looks. Well road bikes went to shit when black came away from the tyres.
Of course many people don't need discs, good luck but some do.
Can't see it being a problem in races. Any injuries are going to be trivial. A hot disc will burn but so does gravel rash.
Discs do a good job of cauterising and cutting, i suppose it is better than chainrings that just cut?
There's an awful lot of cr@p on this thread, most of which seems to be promulgated by people who have never ridden discs.
Badly set up disc brakes suck, but slightly less hard than badly set up rim brakes.
Contrary to popular belief, disc brakes *do not* provide significantly more braking power than rim brakes - it's just more reliable, more controllable and works as well in the wet as in the dry. If anything, hydraulic discs offer much more modulation, and hence control, than rim brakes, so lock-ups become *less* likely, not more.
Changing wheels is trivial with discs, once you're used to having to line up the rotor and caliper first - I've no idea where the myth that the pads automagically close up without any lever-squeezing unless there is a rotor between them has come from - mine have never done this.
What a load of rubbish. Pads do not need to be opened unless the brake lever has been compressed. Motorcycles don't change wheels because they don't have quick releases, they have large through-axles and no chain-tensioning derailleur cage to release the chain.
Changing wheels with discs is a pain in the arse, only thing worse was the backward facing Klein dropouts!!!!
OK: apparently, some people struggle with installing disc-equipped wheels. I should modify my statement to:
"Changing wheels is trivial with discs, unless you're ambisinistrous"
Feel free to try and change the rear wheel on my Top Fuel, If your lucky the disc drops nicely in to the XTR calliper, usually it catches on a pad. So while your fighting chain tension and trying to get the wheel in wasting time.
turn the bike upside down and its fine, try and do it in a hurry the right way up and.....
Chances are you're changing the wheel with the bike upside down and not under the pressure of a race...
For that purpose rim brakes are just a good example of poka-yoke, you can't mess it up getting the wheel back in.
Correctly working bicycle disc brakes should neither drag or need to be opened up to fit a wheel. Not sure where you're getting that impression from.
There are good reasons why the pro-peloton won't use disc brakes but much of it will come down to perception rather than proven fact. For instance, Disc brakes are much heavier than rim brakes. Though weight could be shaved off elsewhere to compensate and still comply.
Disc brakes will make wheel changes slower. Pads have to be opened up before a new wheel can be inserted. All very time consuming. Which is why motor cycle racing generally doesn't bother, a bike swap is the only option.
Disc brakes generally have a small amount of drag but more than Rim brakes. A bit like having a hub dynamo. Not sure if this will be the case for road bikes but it's true for cars and motorbikes.
When it all comes down to it, as Jens Voigt said, 'who the hell uses brakes going downhill?'.
Okay, he was being a bit extreme as he understands that on hairpins, braking from 80KmH to 15KmH needs brakes but what advantage would discs be to someone who is a very fast descender anyway? The fast descenders are not usually great climbers so they won't want any extra weight on their bike and, generally, won't give a monkeys about slowing down.
It'll be interesting to see how it develops.
Sounds more like a closed system than an open.
Could be some interesting innovation around road discs and the changing of wheels.
Basically they will need to find a way to adjust 2-3mm either way from neutral on the fly. I am sure there will be a way to do that... just needs working out.
I think my only hang up with going over to discs is the wheel change and the adoption rates... as mentioned, two speed braking would not be a nice thing in a race, especially in the wet so it would have to be, one over, all over to discs.
I'm trying to remember the context, but I seem to recall some hydraulic system I saw that uses a pull out plunger or reservoir contraption to increase volume and pull back a free end (piston) - presumably for similar reasons. I guess the idea is to just push it back in when finished to reset the system back to (more or less) where it started, but it would need to block off part of the system to have much effect.
Or I could have just imagined it... difficult to say these days If it rings a bell with anyone, please can they put me out of my misery ?
disc brakes look awful on road bikes. they should be kept on mountain bikes
i bet you don't like those pesky STI levers either. or those nasty carbon frames
I prefer the wooden rims and cork blocks myself. At least that way the corks from my liquor stash get recycled. Totally environmentally aware I am.
I can however see wheel ejection issues re-surfacing and would like to see more manufacturers adopt the 15mm through axle design from MTBs. Some already are.
I believe phenolic resins don't so much withstand the temperatures as absorb the heat in combustion. They are in fact designed to burn.
My R785s are great though, they pretty much remove all thoughts of anything between your finger and the tyre contact patch with the ground. I did think at first that the braking experience was a little bit exciting and I felt close to locking up, then I went riding with someone else on rim brakes and realised just how late I was braking in comparison. The other week I did lock up on a narrow steep gravelly Welsh lane but found that correction in such circumstanced is a lot easier and less exciting. The rider behind me on rim brakes also locked up. He took a little longer to appear at the bottom of the hill.
Back in the 90s there was a very similar discussion on the value of disc brakes on MTBs, that was when rims were considered a replaceable part. I think before long we will be filing this one away with that and the arguments about carbon fibre being an inappropriate material for the manufacture of bicycles.
I think that this is great news. Just enough time to hopefully have a choice from Shimano, SRAM and Campy but not so long that I can't wait to get a new bike with discs
Not to mention how a compulsory disc brakes will affect grassroots racers, who suddenly have the choice of buying new high end bikes or stop racing.
Because there are legitimate safety concerns as well as a need to keep the playing field relatively even which has to be carefully balanced with the commercial requirement of the sponsors to sell new stuff.
I don't understand why they don't just make them legal now and allow the manufacturers and teams to sort things out themselves. You can guarantee that if there is a performance improvement to be had, many of the issues will be ironed out amazingly quickly.
My Kinesis Racelight T2 will be the last rim braked bike I ever have. One with discs would be perfect.
I'm holding out until we have electronically actuated disc brakes, with an ABS fitted. Even then, I might hold out a bit longer for the chain free bike - a variable resistance dynamo in the crank powering a motorised hub, and do away with such archaic tech like chains. Everyone wins, no more lubes, no more chain wear, infinite gears...
It'll change racing.
I'll change to disc brakes when my Ti frame packs up, i.e. never.
I'm sure they are better but I just don't give a crap, braking is overrated anyway.
"Re changing wheels, taking the wheel off and putting it back on seems no worse than rim. Nothing technically difficult for the likes of Shimano, it's not like disc brakes have just been invented. Normally hydraulic brakes the pads self centre after one operation and the pads pull back when the lever is released, giving clearance."
This may be your experience with a single bike/wheel combo when changing wheels but because the pad clearances are so small this will be difficult even within a team, never mind neutral service. Hubs, frames, calliper position will all need to be maintained to tight tolerances. Rotors do warp/bend slightly. Cable discs will be a no-no for quick wheel changes as the pads need to be adjusted. I used to swap wheels with different hubs on a mountain bike with hydraulic discs and needed to fettle the calliper each time.
Fair enough. On my old Kona I used to get in the habit of giving the wheel the quick 'waggle' when removing it - slightly bangs the rotor if very close, then slots back in nicely when replacing. One squeeze when rolling off and done. Worked better on the front, but made for quick and easy changes in that case.
I see at least a few pads with chamfered bases these days, that should help too, as will the quick-turn bolt throughs - and their successors - that are around. I dare say by the time / if the pro teams are trying them, they'll have changes quick enough. If your rotor is warped enough to really be a problem, I doubt you'd want to ride it very far anyway.
All that said, i'm not totally convinced about their use at the top-level in general (certain races/stages yes) but look forward to cheaper, lighter and simpler implementations for the rest of us.
This is going to make for nightmare wheel changes in races, not to mention poor bike handlers in pelotons slamming full-on, locking and taking others down too. Not to mention improved brake grip in the wet, when the road surface grip is disappearing.
If it ain't broke...
A common argument against discs is that they're not needed because you can lock up with rim brakes easily enough already. So how would this be different?
@Chuck - Why make it even easier still? That makes little sense.
(other than to push for riders to purchase new bikes and finishing kit to keep up to date)
You can lock them even easier with a Disc.
Pages