Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Long-awaited upgrade of London's Cycle Superhighway 2 announced as businesses back new superhighways

But two proposed routes dropped as others delayed

London's notorious Cycle Superhighway 2 from Bow to Whitechapel will be rebuilt so that its entire length is fully or partially separated from motor traffic by 2016, mayor of London Boris Johnson announced this morning.

Cycle Superhighway 2 was described as “just blue paint" by a police crash investigator at the inquest last year into the 2011 death of Brian Dorling at Bow Roundabout. Even before it opened the route had been strongly criticised by the Metropolitan Police and cycling bodies for encouraging cyclists to use one of London's busiest arterial routes without providing any protection.

After the inquests into the deaths of Brian Dorling at Bow and Philippine de Gerin-Ricard at the Aldgate end of Cycle Superhighway 2 coroner Mary Hassall issued a prevention of future deaths report instructing the mayor and Transport for London (TfL) to explain what action would be taken to make the cycle superhighway safer.

Announcing the public consultation of the plans for the upgraded route, TfL said: "CS2 runs on a busy and intimidating road, but currently offers cyclists no physical protection from motor traffic.

"The number of cyclists on CS2 increased by 32 per cent in the year after the route opened. At some points on the route, the average number of cyclists a day is around 2000 in each direction. This upgrade would improve safety and convenience for these cyclists. It would also encourage the many people who would like to cycle but currently feel unable to do so."

The new route will be separated from traffic by kerbs for most of its length, with 11% of the route semi-segregated using high-visibility wands. The necessary space will come from reducing the width of traffic lanes to 3m, removing the central reservation and narrowing the footway.

At larger junctions, cyclists going straight on will have priority, while motor traffic turning left waits. This is intended to reduce the danger of a the 'left hook' collisions that have claimed the lives of many London cyclists in recent years. In several places eastbound traffic will be prevented from turning right.

Cyclists will get an early green light at several junctions, allowing them to enter the junction before motor traffic. This will be different from the flawed design at Bow Roundabout that allows a handful of riders into a 'cyclists' gate'.

All bus stops on the route will have bus stop bypasses. A similar approach is proposed for bypassing parking and loading bays.

London Cycling Campaign has welcomed the plans. Campaigns manager Rosie Downes said: “These plans are long overdue, and urgently needed. The current strip of blue paint offers no legal or physical protection for cyclists. As with the North-South and East-West cycle superhighway proposals we will be looking closely at the detail, but we’re pleased to see the Mayor is finally delivering on his promise to provide the dedicated space for cycling that’s so urgently needed on this route.”

Businesses line up to support central London superhighways

Meanwhile, more London businesses have thrown their support behind plans for new cycle superhighways crossing central London from east to west and north to south.

London First, the Chamber of Commerce, and the City of London Corporation have all expressed concerns about the new superhighways. But a growing number of business leaders have backed the plans.

Hammer Films, famous for horror movies back in the sixties and seventies, clearly thinks London's current cycling environment could be a character in one of those movies. Marc Schipper, Hammer's CEO said: "A large proportion of our London team commute in by bike. They and I have a right to get to work safely and we support the mayor’s plans for segregated infrastructure.

"In an industry where thousands of collaborators get around London by bike, the least TfL can do is support their need for separate and safe cycling infrastructure.

"The Mayor’s plan and vision for cycling are great news for the film business in London."

Several far larger companies swung their weight behind the new cycle routes today. Writing in The Times, Boris Johnson said that huge accounting firm Deloitte, real estate company Jones Lang la Salle, finance publisher Euromoney, and the Crown Estates have all backed the plans.

"We are becoming at last a true cycling city; and that is why we need to do more to help, and to do it fast," wrote Johnson.

"We want the world on their bike: not just chiselled whippets in lycra. We want a cycling environment that is equally welcoming to women, to families, to pin-striped captains of industry wobbling gently along – the kind of cycle-friendly environment you see in Copenhagen or Amsterdam.

"There is only one way to create this paradise, and that is to invest massively in making cycling safer."

CS6 ands CS12 ditched, others delayed

However, it's not all good news for London cyclists. Two planned cycle superhighways have been dropped by Transport for London and others have been delayed.

In a written answer to a question from Darren Johnson, mayor Boris Johnson said that Cycle Superhighway 6 from Penge to the City and Cycle Superhighway 12 from East Finchley to Angel had been "deleted from the programme."

Only four of the 12 cycle superhighways announced in 2009 have been completed. Consultations are planned for this autumn on CS1; on CS11 for spring 2015 and for CS4 in winter 2015.

TfL is blaming "deliverability constraints within TfL and its supply chain" for delays building Cycle Superhighway 5, which will be at least 2.5 years late.

Darren Johnson said: “The Mayor has dithered, delayed and dropped so many of his promises on cycling. I have a real worry that Boris Johnson will leave office having failed to build the safe cycle lanes that are so desperately needed."

He emphasised that improved cycling facilities would benefit all Londoners. "Encouraging more people to cycle by making it safer, will means less people in cars and on the overcrowded public transport system."

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

11 comments

Avatar
thereverent | 10 years ago
0 likes

This is looking mostly positive.

The new route will be separated from traffic by kerbs for most of its length, with 11% of the route semi-segregated using high-visibility wands. The necessary space will come from reducing the width of traffic lanes to 3m, removing the central reservation and narrowing the footway.

Not sure about the wands, sound like they are the type of thing that gets broken quickly.
Getting rid of central reservations should come first to make the space, then narrowing the lanes and try and avoid narrowing the footways.

Avatar
Slartibartfast87 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Seriously? A motorway costs £17045 per yard... so a smidgeon under £30 million per mile.

So at £25m it'd be a bargain.

Avatar
bikebot replied to Slartibartfast87 | 10 years ago
0 likes
Slartibartfast87 wrote:

Seriously? A motorway costs £17045 per yard... so a smidgeon under £30 million per mile.

So at £25m it'd be a bargain.

Try building a motorway or major trunk road through the middle of the city. The Limehouse Link was the last attempt at that, £293m for just over one mile.

Avatar
Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes

So how many millions or possibly billions is this going to cost ?

Avatar
kie7077 replied to Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:

So how many millions or possibly billions is this going to cost ?

Are you saying we shouldn't build cycling infrastructure? In the last 20 years roughly 3 million people died with obesity being the main cause. This country's GDP is £1,539,682,000,000 I think it is worth spending some of that on getting people cycling.

Avatar
Stumps replied to kie7077 | 10 years ago
0 likes
kie7077 wrote:
stumps wrote:

So how many millions or possibly billions is this going to cost ?

Are you saying we shouldn't build cycling infrastructure? In the last 20 years roughly 3 million people died with obesity being the main cause. This country's GDP is £1,539,682,000,000 I think it is worth spending some of that on getting people cycling.

Excuse me but where in my point is there anything about not building infrastructure ???????

I asked how much it cost as its not shown anywhere.

Avatar
EddyBerckx replied to Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:
kie7077 wrote:
stumps wrote:

So how many millions or possibly billions is this going to cost ?

Are you saying we shouldn't build cycling infrastructure? In the last 20 years roughly 3 million people died with obesity being the main cause. This country's GDP is £1,539,682,000,000 I think it is worth spending some of that on getting people cycling.

Excuse me but where in my point is there anything about not building infrastructure ???????

I asked how much it cost as its not shown anywhere.

Well you got your answer - a pitifully small amount compared to what we're prepared to spend on every other form of transportation.

Avatar
kie7077 replied to Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes

@ Stumps

My apologies, when people ask how much some is going to cost they are often insinuating that they don't want to pay for it.

Avatar
Stumps replied to kie7077 | 10 years ago
0 likes
kie7077 wrote:

@ Stumps

My apologies, when people ask how much some is going to cost they are often insinuating that they don't want to pay for it.

Apology accepted mate. I have no problem with money being spent on infrastructure but you now as well as everyone on here that there will be people who will say its not worth it for a bike path.

But then again how do you put a price on a life ?

Avatar
bikebot replied to Stumps | 10 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:

So how many millions or possibly billions is this going to cost ?

£25million.

TfL spends slightly less than 2% of its budget on cycling infrastructure (well, if you also class the Tour de France as cycling infrastructure, as guess which budget paid for that).

Just for comparison, Crossrail is about £15billion, and if memory serves the new East London bridge will be about £600m. By London standards, cycling infrastructure costs pennies.

Avatar
bikebot | 10 years ago
0 likes

Oooh, that's a new for the excuse rolodex, "deliverability constraints within and its supply chain", must write that down for the future.

Latest Comments