Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Astana gets WorldTour licence with anti-doping strings attached

Europcar refused top-level licence, Yellow Fluo Pro Conti licence also conditional

The UCI has decided to grant a WorldTour licence to the Astana team, subject to conditions relating to its implementation of anti-doping measures, with president Brian Cookson making it clear the Kazakh outfit is “on probation.” The world governing body of cycling also issued a Pro Continental licence to the Yellow Fluo team but declined to grant a WorldTour licence to Europcar.

Official confirmation that Astana had been given WorldTour licence for 2015 came in a statement, the full text of which appears at the end of this article, released late yesterday evening by the UCI.

But the team had already taken to Twitter earlier in the evening to break the news, which was greeted with dismay and outrage by many on the social network, some accusing UCI president Brian Cookson of failing to follow through on his pledge to clean up the sport.

Cookson said the Astana case “remains a very serious situation for our sport given the number of doping cases,” and that the team “can be considered very much to be on probation.”

In a statement published in Russian on its website Astana said it was “pleased and proud to announce that we have received confirmation of our licence to participate in the World Tour in 2015 and take part in all the most prestigious races of the upcoming season.”

It added that it wanted to thank "riders, team staff, families, sponsors, friends and our fans for all your support."

Due to the Licence Commission’s decision to give Astana the go-ahead to compete in WorldTour races next season the UCI side-steps what would have been an expensive visit to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, as happened when Katusha was refused a licence two years ago.

The conditions imposed by the Licence Commission that made the decision mean Astana’s Licence could be taken away if another rider is found guilty of a doping offence in the coming months, or it fails to comply with the conditions imposed on it.

The Institute of Sport Sciences of the University of Lausanne will examine the recent doping cases involving Astana riders and will also audit the team to assess whether its “internal structures, culture and management systems … are adequate to ensure that the highest ethical standards are upheld.”

The team has also been ordered to implement in the coming season internal operational requirements that will be compulsory for all top-tier teams from 2017 and which eight teams have agreed to trial on a voluntary basis.

Astana was warned, however, that “In the event that the audit would lead to reveal deficiencies or in case of faulty implementation of the internal operational requirements or if another doping case would occur within the Team during the 2015 season, the UCI would refer the matter to the Licence Commission for a determination on an eventual withdrawal of the licence.”

The Licence Commission added that the UCI was still waiting for the file regarding the Padua investigation in Italy in which a number of past and present Astana riders are implicated, adding: “For the time being, the elements of this procedure are unknown to the UCI and the Licence Commission and no consequence can be drawn in this case at hand. The UCI would call upon the Commission if evidence against the Team is established.”

Europcar’s failure to secure a WorldTour licence, leaving the top tier of the sport with 17 teams next year, was on financial grounds. The car hire business that currently acts as headline sponsor has already indicated it will be pulling out at the end of next season.

Meanwhile Yellow Fluo, which has seen three riders fail anti-doping controls in the past two editions of the Giro d’Italia, has been granted a Professional Continental licence but again subject to conditions related to its ethical policies.

Full UCI statement

Concerning Astana Pro Team, last October, the UCI asked the Licence Commission to undertake a full review of the management and anti-doping policies of the Astana Pro Team. This request followed positive tests on two of its riders, Maxim and Valentin Iglinskiy (EPO), and on Ilya Davidenok (anabolic steroids), a trainee with the UCI ProTeam Astana since August 1st this year.

In accordance with the UCI Regulations, the team appeared before the Licence Commission in Geneva on November 6th. After an in-depth examination of the situation, the Licence Commission reached the following findings:

  • “The organisation of the fight against doping and the support personnel of the riders in place until now by the team has defaulted”;
  • “[The team] has initiated a reorganisation of all the support personnel of its riders in order to strengthen its fight against doping within the team to ensure greater prevention and repression”;
  • “In view of the heavy and repeated doping cases, which occurred within the Team, it is therefore essential to monitor the implementation of such measures on the ground”.

In light of the above, the Licence Commission has subordinated the 2015 registration team to the two following conditions:

  • That the Astana Pro Team is audited by the Institute of Sport Sciences of the University of Lausanne (ISSUL) (2), an independent body recognised for its expertise in this field. The ISSUL will look into the circumstances of the doping cases at stake to determine whether and to what extent the team and or/its management is responsible of the recent events. Furthermore, it will assess the team’s internal structures, culture and management systems to understand whether these are adequate to ensure that the highest ethical standards are upheld. It will release its report early February 2015. The audit will be paid for by the Team.
  • That the Astana Pro Team adheres from 2015 to the internal operational requirements (3), which will be compulsory for all UCI World Teams from 2017 as part of the reform of men’s professional road cycling. Astana Pro Team will join a group of eight teams that have volunteered to implement.

The Licence Commission however warned that: “In the event that the audit would lead to reveal deficiencies or in case of faulty implementation of the internal operational requirements or if another doping case would occur within the Team during the 2015 season, the UCI would refer the matter to the Licence Commission for a determination on an eventual withdrawal of the licence.”

The Licence Commission also noted with respect to the recent allegations regarding the Padova investigation that as UCI is still waiting for the file: “For the time being, the elements of this procedure are unknown to the UCI and the Licence Commission and no consequence can be drawn in this case at hand. The UCI would call upon the Commission if evidence against the Team is established.”

Therefore, the occurrence of any the aforementioned grounds, amongst others, would prompt a referral to the Licence Commission to envisage, if necessary, the withdrawal of the licence.

Concerning Europcar, the Licence Commission has decided to reject the team’s request for registration for the 2015 season. The Licence Commission estimates that the team does not fulfil the financial criteria. The UCI will be able to evaluate the possibility of registering the team as a UCI Professional Continental Team. In accordance with the UCI Regulations, the registration refusal leads to the withdrawal of the UCI WorldTour Licence.

With regards to Yellow Fluo, the Licence Commission has decided to register the team as a UCI Professional Continental Team for the 2015 season upon the condition that team undergoes stringent controls by the Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation and the UCI to verify the team’s implementation of its announced anti-doping measures.

Concerning Cult Energy, the Licence Commission has granted the team until December 15th to submit a new registration file.

Welcoming the decisions, UCI President Brian Cookson said “I would like to thank the Licence Commission, who has carried out its work thoroughly, professionally and independently of the UCI.

“In the case of the Astana Pro Team, this remains a very serious situation for our sport given the number of doping cases. We shall be following the situation very closely and are awaiting to review the results of the audit. Meanwhile, the team will have to comply with the two requirements imposed by the Licence Commission. The combined effect of this is that the Astana Pro Team can be considered very much to be on probation.

“Regarding Team Europcar, it is of course regrettable that the team has not been able to secure sufficient financial guarantees to remain in the UCI WorldTour, but I very much hope that they can continue as a Professional Continental Team.

“In the case of Yellow Fluo, it is vital that they comply with the conditions outlined. Concerning Cult Energy, I hope that they are able to make the deadline for the provision of a new file, as requested by the Commission.”

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

31 comments

Avatar
brakesmadly | 9 years ago
0 likes

You have to distinguish between what is 'right' and what is legal. Unfortunately the two don't always coincide.

Avatar
macrophotofly | 9 years ago
0 likes

If you disagree with this decision then please do not use or buy the products sponsoring this team - it can be as easy as that.
That means not buying these -

Look
Ceramic Speed
Corima
SRM
Specialized
FSA
Campagnolo

(http://proteam-astana.com/about/)

Avatar
ajmarshal1 replied to macrophotofly | 9 years ago
0 likes
macrophotofly wrote:

If you disagree with this decision then please do not use or buy the products sponsoring this team - it can be as easy as that.
That means not buying these -

Look
Ceramic Speed
Corima
SRM
Specialized
FSA
Campagnolo

(http://proteam-astana.com/about/)

Don't buy Campagnolo? Are you mad? I refuse to make such a sacrifice.

Avatar
HalfWheeler | 9 years ago
0 likes

Cookson is like one of those politicians, "vote for me and I'll clean up politics", only to find that once in power the guy at the top is essentially powerless.

Money talks, bullshit walks.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

We have two top team which are run by unrepentant former dopers, whose riders perform at astonishing levels. We need to take action to clean up the sport.

Absolutely right. The two teams run by unrepentant dopers, Riis and Vinokourov, were far and away the strongest during the 2014 Tour, which is very disappointing.

Going off at a tangent, I was slightly surprised to see Nicolas Roche signing for Sky. In accordance with Sky's policy, he must have signed to say that he has never doped. He's done well to get through his career to date and stay clean.

Avatar
TheSpaniard replied to HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

Going off at a tangent, I was slightly surprised to see Nicolas Roche signing for Sky. In accordance with Sky's policy, he must have signed to say that he has never doped. He's done well to get through his career to date and stay clean.

Of course the major assumption here is that Sky are as squeaky clean as they'd have us believe

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:
Quote:

We have two top team which are run by unrepentant former dopers, whose riders perform at astonishing levels. We need to take action to clean up the sport.

Absolutely right. The two teams run by unrepentant dopers, Riis and Vinokourov, were far and away the strongest during the 2014 Tour, which is very disappointing.

Well, to play Devils advocate, for the two far and away strongest teams they managed (Nibali aside)

- 6th and 11th in the team results
- no-one in the top 20 individual
- no-one in the top 20 points
- 2 in the top 20 climbers (Majka 1st and Roche 17th ?)

Now obviously Astana were working for GC but even so, if that's thee 'far and away strongest teams' then it doesn't say much. Go have a look at the results for FDJ, Lotto and AG2R in comparison. Cheating gits ? Absolutely to some degree, probably didn't effect the overall though.

Avatar
crazy-legs | 9 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
mrmo replied to crazy-legs | 9 years ago
0 likes
crazy-legs wrote:

Latest from Brain Cookson:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/exclusive-cookson-says-astana-are-dr...

UCI's hands are tied,

Avatar
Grizzerly | 9 years ago
0 likes

Surely, the UCI are the organisation which sets the criteria for granting team licenses. Since the election of Brian Cookson, there must have been opportunity to ensure that only teams committed to clean racing could join the World Tour. We have two top team which are run by unrepentant former dopers, whose riders perform at astonishing levels. We need to take action to clean up the sport.

We need to take that action now. The 'probationary' conditions imposed on Astana should be standard conditions for the issue of any team licence. There should be a requirement for all team officials to be 'fit and proper' persons, not including those who adopt ambivalent or encouraging attitudes to doping.

In the wider sporting world, WADA & IOC need to ensure that all sports and all nations adopt appropriate attitudes to clean competition.

This needs to happen now if sport as a concept is to survive.

Avatar
gareth2510 | 9 years ago
0 likes

UCI give Astana and deny Europcar (formerly known as) a World Tour spot. Gutted

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
0 likes

The UCI had no choice, despite what some seem to think, unless they catch the whole team with hypo's in their arms CAS will overrule any decision.

For Astana to be banned the case has to be absolute, no room for legal manoeuvres.

Avatar
zanf | 9 years ago
0 likes

Maybe Brian is being careful and more tempered dealing with this situation considering that he really jumped the gun concerning that Colombian women team kit fiasco?

Avatar
Mr Agreeable | 9 years ago
0 likes

What a messed-up situation. I feel for the smaller teams trying to hold things together while sponsors melt away because the sport increasingly seems incurably dirty.

Avatar
Gasman Jim | 9 years ago
0 likes

Yakshimash! Vino is so happy he's taken the boys on a team building day out to help them recover their morale after these recent scandalous and unfounded accusations:

http://iloveskydiving.org/view/videos/borat-sagdiev-skydive-for-glorious...

Enjoy!

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Astana is rotten, maybe not every rider, I think Nibali is clean, but very stupid for moving to a team covered in so much shit.

I'm surprised at how much credit and benefit of the doubt people are prepared to give Nibali.

It is fair enough while there is no smoking gun. But if we get to see the photo of Ferrari at the Astana team hotel in November 2013, and if it is proved that Astana riders were systematically doping, it will start to become unbelievable that Nibali was unaware of what his teammates were doing, and that the team's strongest rider was the only one not taking performance enhancing drugs.

Avatar
RobD | 9 years ago
0 likes

It looks like it was all they could do, but by putting the doping rulings in place and Astana agreeing to them, if something does come out of the Padua investigation they'd have no argument if the license was revoked in a month or two's time.

I think the bigger shame is that Europcar don't have a license, not having funding beyond the 2015 season is fair enough, but if they're not a world tour team for this season, how are they expected to attract new possible sponsors?

Avatar
stenmeister | 9 years ago
0 likes

They should have revoked the licence for the year, dropped them to Pro Continental level, leaving the door open for Nibali to defend the Tour under a wild card.

My expert opinion so there.  16

Avatar
Bigfoz | 9 years ago
0 likes

How depressing, and what a failure from the UCI. A team doped regularly (proven by repeated fails), under review for yet further allegations is rewarded with a licence, while a clean team with a good reputation has theirs removed because they're "estimated" to be short on budget.

Brian Cookson should be ashamed of the mess the UCI is in. This is the kind of balls up we expected from the previous incumbent.

Avatar
crazy-legs replied to Bigfoz | 9 years ago
0 likes
Bigfoz wrote:

How depressing, and what a failure from the UCI. A team doped regularly (proven by repeated fails), under review for yet further allegations is rewarded with a licence, while a clean team with a good reputation has theirs removed because they're "estimated" to be short on budget.

Brian Cookson should be ashamed of the mess the UCI is in. This is the kind of balls up we expected from the previous incumbent.

Sorry but you're wrong on every count. Have a read of this
http://inrng.com/2014/12/astana-uci-licence/
which I linked to earlier.

If you want them banned, that means the UCI are making up the rules as they go along, something which was "the kind of balls up we expected from the previous incumbent".

Avatar
Ginsterdrz | 9 years ago
0 likes

But there's a test in the licence application entitled 'Ethics'.

How did Astana get past that in preference to Europcar???

Or maybe an alternative route:

https://twitter.com/terrydolan1/status/542945285547515904

Avatar
Must be Mad | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Isn't there already a condition in place, it's called, 'no doping'.

Riders can be banned for doping - but what is the rule about banning teams? Does it exist?

I think there *should* be rules which hold teams accountable for doping violations, but making up rules when it suits is not a good way to go.

Avatar
SirCav | 9 years ago
0 likes

Could Astana's license at the very least not have been suspended until the audit had taken place and found it to be a fit and proper outfit? IMHO Astana Pro Team should have been banned for the 2015 season whilst it got its house in order and proved beyond all doubt that it satisfied the two conditions set out by the Licensing Committee.
To paraphrase from one of my favourite films, 'The Right Stuff' I think the Licensing Committee, the UCI - and Brian Cookson - have screwed the pooch with this decsion.

Avatar
crazy-legs | 9 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Money talks and the UCI are slaves to it.

Quote:

/slow hand clap aimed at the UCI

Actually the UCI are playing to the rules, they didn't have a choice in the matter - they went by the judgement of the entirely independent licence review board. Had they not done that, Astana would have gone to the CAS and won. Have a read of this:

http://inrng.com/2014/12/astana-uci-licence/

One positive (if you'll excuse the pun...) is that at least they're under strict conditions and there's an audit into the teams activities being conducted.

Avatar
antonio | 9 years ago
0 likes

Isn't there already a condition in place, it's called, 'no doping'.

Avatar
Simmo72 | 9 years ago
0 likes

Have we progressed since 1998? You have to wonder sometimes. Astana is rotten, maybe not every rider, I think Nibali is clean, but very stupid for moving to a team covered in so much shit.

Lets see what comes out with the recent set of doping revelations in Italy but in my humble opinion Vino does not belong in this sport.

Avatar
Must be Mad | 9 years ago
0 likes

Yes, it would have been good to see an example made - however should the UCI break their own rules to make this happen?

My take on this is that the UCI are aware of the further allegations against the team which are currently being investigated (Padova etc) - but as yet there has not yet been any firm evidence which would stand up in court they could use to enforce a ban.

I don't think this is over, but I'm guessing that the competition license could not wait indefinitely for the full investigation to complete.

Avatar
andyp | 9 years ago
0 likes

I'm assuming that in all of this 'review of management' and 'reorganisation of support personnel' spiel that I've missed the announcement about Vino's leaving of the team?

Avatar
mrchrispy | 9 years ago
0 likes

/slow hand clap aimed at the UCI

Avatar
Gkam84 | 9 years ago
0 likes

Money talks and the UCI are slaves to it.

Pages

Latest Comments